Need help understanding a REG2 MCQ

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #184509
    j3w3ly
    Member

    I tried searching for an explanation online, but found nothing. This question is confusing to me because it seems like the couple is being punished for earning less money. It seems as though they could have taken a higher credit if the wife had earned more money. The question:

    Frank and Mary Wood have 2 children, Becky, age 10, and Matt, age 14. The Woods incur expenses of $4,000 for after school-care for each child. Their only income is from wages. Frank’s wages are $60,000, and Mary’s wages are $2,500. What amount of Child and Dependent Care Credit may the Woods claim on their joint tax return?

    a. $800

    b. $500

    c. $1,600

    d. $1,200

    Explanation

    Choice “b” is correct. First of all we need to determine the eligible expenses. Only expenses for Becky will qualify because Matt is not under 13 years of age. So of the $8,000 spent, only $4,000 will qualify. The maximum eligible for 1 dependent, though, is $3,000. Then it is further limited because it is limited to the lowest earned income of either spouse. That would be Mary’s $2,500. Due to their combined income level, they are in the 20% credit range. The credit is 20% of $2,500, or $500.

    Choices “c”, “a”, and “d” are incorrect, per the above explanation.

    BEC - 84
    AUD - 95
    REG - 86
    FAR - 7/11/14

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #539122
    seattleacct
    Member

    Here's a link to the IRS publication regarding the situation:

    https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p503.pdf

    It's true that they are seemingly punished for one of the spouses having a low income, but I guess it might make sense if you think about it regarding time spent at home vs. working.

    Why did they need to spend $8k on child care if the wife only worked enough to earn $2,500? She should have stayed home with the kids and saved $5500 (or $5000 w/the credit).

    In regard to the other part of your statement regarding the higher income, the credit phases out after a certain income threshhold, but not below 20%. The higher your income, the less help you get from the government…

    B:76
    A:64, 73, 91!
    R:77
    F:76

    CPAexcel, Wiley Test Bank, Ninja Audio & Notes

    #539151
    seattleacct
    Member

    Here's a link to the IRS publication regarding the situation:

    https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p503.pdf

    It's true that they are seemingly punished for one of the spouses having a low income, but I guess it might make sense if you think about it regarding time spent at home vs. working.

    Why did they need to spend $8k on child care if the wife only worked enough to earn $2,500? She should have stayed home with the kids and saved $5500 (or $5000 w/the credit).

    In regard to the other part of your statement regarding the higher income, the credit phases out after a certain income threshhold, but not below 20%. The higher your income, the less help you get from the government…

    B:76
    A:64, 73, 91!
    R:77
    F:76

    CPAexcel, Wiley Test Bank, Ninja Audio & Notes

    #539124
    j3w3ly
    Member

    Thank you!

    BEC - 84
    AUD - 95
    REG - 86
    FAR - 7/11/14

    #539153
    j3w3ly
    Member

    Thank you!

    BEC - 84
    AUD - 95
    REG - 86
    FAR - 7/11/14

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.