- This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by
lolo.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200895
-
AuthorReplies
-
April 29, 2016 at 8:59 pm #764751
Claudia408ParticipantApril 29, 2016 at 9:01 pm #764752
Just3LettersParticipantSarika,
I would say that you sound very prepared! Most people score higher on the real exam then Becker! I scored 81% on my becker exam the other day so you have me beat at this point!
Does anybody have a method of studying specific trouble areas? For example, $ Value Lifo questions, Translation/Remeasurement questions?
I tried to set up MC to do just 10-20 of those areas but you have to do the entire category such as inventory rather than dollar value life or all foreign currency rather than translation/remeasurement.
ugh.
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 29, 2016 at 9:07 pm #764753
Claudia408ParticipantJust3 – i think for $ value lifo, you might get one MCQ on it, but doubtful for a SIM. I am personally not putting any time to understand it other than the formula.
I also recently looked up Remeasurement/ Translation and this is a great explanation:
Translate
Your subsidiary transact in Euros and records in subsidiary records – this is functional currency. The reporting currency is US Dollars on the parent. To get from Euros to USD you “translate” and plug OCI for the out of balance equity difference. You hit OCI as the gain/loss is a fair value type adjustment (think of of AFS securities hitting OCI).Remeasurement
If, as a subsidiary, you buy and sell in United States Dollars, but keep your book in Euros, your functional currency is US dollars, not Euros. As such, you would re-measure your books from Euros to U.S. Dollars, the functional currency. You're net plug goes to the income statement because you were transacting in the United States Dollar all along.Remeasurment + Translation.
You are a subsidiary transacting in Euros, but keeping your books and records in Pesos. Your reporting currency of the parent is USD. To get to your functional currency, you re-measure from Pesos to Euros. Then you translate from Euros to Dollars.
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8April 29, 2016 at 9:07 pm #764754
StilgoinParticipantBased on the stock transactions below, what is the weighted-average number of shares outstanding as of December 31, year 1, that should be used in the calculation of basic earnings per share in financial statements issued on March 1, year 2?
Date Transactions
January 1, year 1 Beginning balance 100,000
April 1, year 1 Issued 30,000 shares for cash
June 1, year 1 50% stock dividend
February 15, year 2 2-for-1 stock split
March 15, year 2 Issued 40,000 shares for cashA.147,500
B.183,750
C.295,000
D. 367,500
Answer is D
Here is the explanation:
Earnings per share (EPS) is a comparison of the earnings applicable to common stock with the number of shares of common stock of that enterprise. Basic EPS is based on the weighted-average number of actual common shares (WACS) outstanding during the period. In computing WACS, retroactive application is given to stock splits and stock dividends. WACS is computed as follows:
1/1 100,000 × 1.5 × 12/12 = 150,000
4/1 30,000 × 1.5 × 9/12 = 33,750183,750 x 2 = 367,500
Effect of retroactive splitCan somebody tell me where the 1.50 came from?
B | 62, 78
A | 73, 67, 79
R | 82
F | 59, 59, WaitingEthics | 93
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
~Winston Churchill“In a world full of critics, be an encourager."
April 29, 2016 at 9:13 pm #764755
StilgoinParticipantI’m trying to post a question- but it won’t show up. I have this problem often. Anyone else??
B | 62, 78
A | 73, 67, 79
R | 82
F | 59, 59, WaitingEthics | 93
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
~Winston Churchill“In a world full of critics, be an encourager."
April 29, 2016 at 9:54 pm #764756
marqzhoParticipant1.5 is because of the stock dividend
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84April 29, 2016 at 10:43 pm #764757
OnedayParticipantHi can someone clear this up for me? The wording is kind of confusing.
“Costs in excess of billing on long term contracts,” is a current asset.
“Billings in excess of costs on long term contracts,” is a current liability.I get the former one since you need to charge the counterpart more for the excess cost, so it would be an asset.
But why would the Excess of billing over cost be a liability? Does the company need to payback the excess? How would a company make profit without taking that excess?
April 29, 2016 at 10:53 pm #764758
StilgoinParticipant@marqzho Thank ya. I saw it after I posted. Just shows the stupid mistakes that I could make on the exam. 😉
B | 62, 78
A | 73, 67, 79
R | 82
F | 59, 59, WaitingEthics | 93
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
~Winston Churchill“In a world full of critics, be an encourager."
April 29, 2016 at 10:54 pm #764759
Just3LettersParticipantClaudia,
Thanks! I think the toughest part for me for foreign currency is remembering what rate to use (current/historical/WA). I Know current for monetary A+L/, Historical for non-monetary, and WA for I/S items, but I think that's only for translation. I believe re-measurement values items differently, correct?
Stillgoin, yes. I have that problem all the time. I probably won't be able to see any responses to this post for at least an hour haha
Look back in this thread and you will see me complaining about my posts messing up all the time
@Jeff, what's going on???
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 29, 2016 at 10:56 pm #764760
StilgoinParticipant@Just3Letters Thank you! I thought I was losing my mind. Lol I had emailed and asked a couple times if it was me. Hahaha
B | 62, 78
A | 73, 67, 79
R | 82
F | 59, 59, WaitingEthics | 93
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
~Winston Churchill“In a world full of critics, be an encourager."
April 29, 2016 at 11:05 pm #764761
Spartans92ParticipantHaha I always have this issue. Thought It was my server so I never bother to ask.
BEC- PASS
April 29, 2016 at 11:07 pm #764762
marqzhoParticipantBillings in excess of costs on long term contracts
It is kind of like an Unearned revenue. You billed your client, but you have not yet “earned” that $. It represents an over-billing.
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84April 29, 2016 at 11:15 pm #764763
StilgoinParticipant@ThisIsTheYear
Billings in Excess of Costs and Profits-
Based upon the assumption that the profit is uniformly spread over the project:
The project is over billed
We have billed for more profit that we have earned
Taxes may be deferred on profit even though it has been paidIs a liability to the company
The way I remember it is billings in excess of costs and profits is bad and we are probably gonna owe somebody something. It is very confusing. I hope this helps. 😉
B | 62, 78
A | 73, 67, 79
R | 82
F | 59, 59, WaitingEthics | 93
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
~Winston Churchill“In a world full of critics, be an encourager."
April 29, 2016 at 11:37 pm #764764
OnedayParticipantThanks! I was actually just reading this forum https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/construction-in-progress
And saw your post lolJust one more question. Do we net the excess of cost and estimated profit over billing and excess of billing over cost and estimated profit for balance sheet?
On one of my materials it seems like you net it but on ninja mcq it seems you write separately on the balance sheet.
April 29, 2016 at 11:45 pm #764765
marqzhoParticipantThey don't net with each other. In a company, it will have more than one project
Project A Overbill 500
Project B Underbill 500
Project C Overbill 10000
Project D None
Project E NoneYou will then have a asset account for 500
and a liability account for 10500REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 73’ is closed to new replies.
