FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 27

Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 2,502 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1436651
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just trying to clarify the new GAAP rules: for inventory it is lower of cost or net realizable value for all inventory methods except LIFO and retail. How do you apply the new inventory method?

    #1436708
    mcohen1993
    Participant

    @Bondvillian

    I would hold out and wait until you get to the exam to see if they ask about using the LCM or least of cost or NRV. Becker specifies.

    As for another inventory question, does the CPA exam test the retail method of inventory cost allocation? If so, what chapter of Becker would this be in? It does not appear in the Inventory section.

    REG: 91!!
    BEC: 80!!
    AUD: TBA
    FAR: TBA

    In the order I plan to take the exams.

    #1436799
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You would hold off until the exam? I want to know how to apply the new method if it does come up in the exam – at least I'll be ready.

    #1436948
    Spartans92
    Participant

    @mcohen or any other people.. so is unusual and infrequent reported in continuing operations? I prob should review what goes in what category. So relating back to that previous example the 350 loss in in discontinued operations. why is that? is it because it was sold so hence discontinued?

    BEC- PASS

    #1436975
    Spartans92
    Participant

    @bond, all the questions I have encountered in becker were Gaap or IFRS. I didnt really see a retail one before but all I say is LCM for GAAP and LCNRV for IFRS.

    I may be confused lol.

    BEC- PASS

    #1437048
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Not using becker so I can not point you in the right direction but yes, retail method can and does show up so I would recommend giving it at least a passing glance.

    I am in agreement with you @bond I am getting very confused by the new changes and really would love clarification before test date

    spartan- anything unusual and / or infrequent should be stated as a separate component of continuing operations.
    thus
    The bond is infrequent but not unusual should be separately stated +260
    Hurricane loss was both infrequent and unusual so should be stated separately -255
    Giving you a net Component of Continued operation of 5

    Steel Transportation Unit was completely sold meaning there is no more transportation department it has been discontinued- for a loss- this is a discontinued operations should be stated under discontinued ops. net of tax

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1437050
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Oh GOOD FREAKING GOSH Mtaylo wasn't kidding with this gleim inventory crap… can anyone please help me understand this question???? Thanks so much!

    The Hastings Company began operations on January 1, Year 1, and uses the FIFO method in costing its raw material inventory. Management is contemplating a change to the LIFO method and is interested in determining what effect such a change will have on net income. Accordingly, the following information has been developed:

    Final Inventory
    FIFO
    Year 1 $240,000
    Year 2 $270,000

    LIFO
    Year 1 200,000
    Year 2 210,000
    Net income per FIFO= Year 1 $120,000
    Year 2 $170,000

    Based upon the above information, a change to the LIFO method in Year 2 results in net income for Year 2 of
    income for Year 2 of
    A.$150,000
    B.$110,000
    C.$230,000
    D.$170,000

    Answer (A) is correct.
    A change in accounting principle requires retrospective application. All periods reported must be individually adjusted for the period specific effects of applying the new principle. The difference in income in the second year is equal to the $20,000 difference between the FIFO inventory change and the LIFO inventory change (FIFO: $270,000 – $240,000 = $30,000 change; LIFO: $210,000 – $200,000 = $10,000 change; $30,000 – $10,000 = $20,000 difference). The $170,000 FIFO net income will decrease by $20,000. Net LIFO income will therefore be $150,000 ($170,000 – $20,000).

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1437054
    Stilgoin
    Participant

    I did all my NFP questions in NINJA MCQs yesterday. That question we had about the BDE came up twice. One question subtracted the BDE and one question did not. That is so frustrating.😣 I know it is a minor detail, but the whole exam is based on minor details. So we decided to subtract out provision for bad debt for NFPs when determining revenues. Correct?

    I need clarification on updates as well.

    B | 62, 78
    A | 73, 67, 79
    R | 82
    F | 59, 59, Waiting

    Ethics | 93

    "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
    ~Winston Churchill

    “In a world full of critics, be an encourager."

    #1437074
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Here's a question that might help illustrate new accounting rules for costing inventory:

    A. A. Corporation sells t-shirts displaying humorous sayings or pictures of popular artists. As such, they often have to deal with permanent writedowns of inventories that may only be able to be sold at reduced prices. A particular item, Shirt G, of which A. A. has 1,000 units on hand at the end of the year, has the following characteristics:

    Cost of Shirt G – $12
    Replacement cost of Shirt G – 10
    Net realizable value of Shirt G – 11
    Normal profit margin for Shirt G – 2

    Assuming that A. A. Corporation writes its inventory items down on an individual item basis, and further, that A. A. Corporation applies the rules of IFRS, what would the unit price of Shirt G be after the writedown?

    A. $12
    B. $11
    C. $10
    D. $9

    So IFRS uses the “lower of cost or net realizable” convention; I'm assuming it's the same for GAAP (except LIFO and retail)?

    Answer is B.

    #1437078
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    @McKan, It's all downhill from here. This one seems straight forward though (I don't question the answer explanations much, so that could be my problem.), what part are you struggling w/?

    Yr 1/2 change in FIFO – Yr 1/2 change in LIFO is subtracted from Yr2 Net Income.

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #1437104
    mckan514w
    Participant

    ha mtaylo maybe that's my problem trying to figure out these damn explanations! thanks for breaking this down for me

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1437132
    Stilgoin
    Participant

    A change from FIFO to LIFO is a change in accounting principle. A change in FIFO to Dollar Value LIFO would be a change in estimate that is unseparable from a change in principle because it is impracticable to go back and do LIFO layers in previous years, so it would be counted as a change in estimate and treated prospectively.

    Look at your question in terms of Beg inventory and End inventory for Lifo and same for Fifo and compare the difference between the two. The end of year one is the beginning of year two- Fifo inv for yr 30,000 minus Lifo inv for yr 10,000 equals a 20,000 difference, and you are looking for the change in NI FIFO year two, which means 20,000 less going from Fifo to Lifo.

    I hope that makes sense…..

    B | 62, 78
    A | 73, 67, 79
    R | 82
    F | 59, 59, Waiting

    Ethics | 93

    "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
    ~Winston Churchill

    “In a world full of critics, be an encourager."

    #1437140
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    @McKan – No worries! That's why I keep doing the questions over and over before I move on homie. These explanations make my head spin…I would rather just put everything into my own words!

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #1437147
    mckan514w
    Participant

    I hear ya mtaylo and I see Dollar Value Lifo is next up- that ought to be good and fun! ha ha ha ha

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1437185
    Spartans92
    Participant

    On 1/1/Year 1, Flint Co. (a U.S. GAAP company) issues an annual-pay, 10-year, $750,000, 4.25% coupon bond when market rates are 5.00%. The bond’s issuance price is $706,565. One year later, Flint redeems the bond at 94.

    The question asked what the unamortized discount is. I know the discount is 750,000 – 706,565 = 43,435. Then I get 3,453 for amortization.. So to get unamortized I take the difference.. I just wanna make sure I'm understanding this, So generally bond discount are added back to get towards face value, hence unamortized I will deduct? Thanks! Not sure if I made my point clear but I'm just lil confused why I take the difference as oppose to add the amortized part onto the discount… That would be for premium, right?

    Im sorry if these questions are stupid.. sometimes I feel dumb when I'm studying FAR :/

    BEC- PASS

Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 2,502 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 27’ is closed to new replies.