- This topic has 851 replies, 139 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 20, 2014 at 6:24 pm #190225
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 23, 2015 at 6:32 am #654939
excel monkeyParticipant@Determined CPA – The fun of derivatives and hedging. In this problem, Imp Co. entered into a firm commitment to purchase equipment. A firm commitment is basically a contract where both the price and the quantity are agreed upon prior to delivery. Imp is exposed to foreign currency risk because they have agreed to purchase the equipment for a fixed price in a different currency (francs in this case). In order to mitigate this risk, Imp entered into a forward contract to lock in its costs at $90,000 (100,000 francs * $.90). At the inception of there is no journal entry required for both the firm commitment and the forward contract. The forward contract has no value at inception, and the purchase order would not be recorded for financial statement purposes. At the fiscal year end, both the forward contract and the firm commitment would be marked to market, with gains/losses recognized on the income statement. On 12/31/20X1, Imp’s forward contract has increased in value by $3,000 because, while they locked in $.90/franc, a contract with the same delivery date, purchased 12/31/20X1, would cost $.93/franc. At the same time however, Imps firm commitment (a liability) has increased because they have agreed to purchase this equipment for 100,000 francs. When they agreed to the firm commitment, the machine was projected to cost them $90,000. However, when marked to market on 12/31/20X1, the machine would now cost $93,000, a $3,000 loss simply from changes to the exchange rate. The 3,000 gain on the forward contract and the 3,000 loss on the firm commitment will offset each other on the income statement, for a net gain/loss of $0. Journal entries would be:
12/12/20X1 – No entry required
12/31/20X1 – To record the gain in fair value on the forward contract
Dr. Investment in forward contract………………………..3,000 ($.93-$.90) X 100,000
Cr. Exchange gain………………………………………………3,000
12/31/20X1 – To record the loss on the firm commitment
Dr. Exchange loss………………………………………….3,000
Cr. Firm commitment……………………………………………3,000
I hope this helps more than confuses you. And good luck later today!
Also, something that helped me with preferred dividends and EPS was realizing it's reported on the Income Statement, which is for one fiscal year only. Therefore, only the current years portion of preferred cumulative dividends, noncumulative preferred dividends declared are subtracted to get net income available to common stock holders. Dividends in arrears are ignored for EPS.
FAR - 91
AUD - 88
BEC - 86
REG - 79February 23, 2015 at 1:18 pm #654940
AnonymousInactivetaking FAR tomorrow!!!!! Second time 🙁 Hope is the last oneeeeee
February 23, 2015 at 2:29 pm #654941
Determined CPAParticipantcpatobepr – GOOD LUCK!!
Leaving in a few to take my exam – second time, too!!! Praying so hard this is the last one for me!!!!!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 23, 2015 at 5:23 pm #654942
slgavin7MemberWhy is the forward rate ignored in that question? I've been through a couple different study materials and I have not found a cogent explanation of forward rates and spot rates and when each are used. It seems like in every question I encounter, a different combination of the rates is used in calculating the gain/loss each time.
February 23, 2015 at 5:51 pm #654943
excel monkeyParticipantI think the way the question formatting transferred over makes it appear as if the forward rate is ignored. However the forward rates are used in this question The forward rate, for delivery on 3/12/20X2, was $.90 on 12/12/20X1 and $.93 on 12/31/20X1 hence the $3,000 gain on the forward contract and the $3,000 loss on the firm commitment.
FAR - 91
AUD - 88
BEC - 86
REG - 79February 23, 2015 at 6:00 pm #654944
slgavin7MemberOh good I see what you're saying. Thought I had to reinvent the wheel there! Thanks!
February 23, 2015 at 6:42 pm #654945
jbarwickMemberHold on a second. This Foreign Transaction question CPA-01598 has some discrepancies as to what the actual answer is:
According to you guys, Ninja = $0
According to Becker = $3,000
According to Bisk = $10,000
I remembered this question and finally got around to it in a Becker review. I thought $3,000 since the contract was taken out for equipment made to Imp's specifications. There were other questions similar to where if something is made for a specific customer, they owe the money thus $0.88 now, and since it is now $0.93 they have a gain on the transaction due to the hedge.
Journey Started - January 2015
FAR - 4/2015 - Passed
AUD - 7/2015 - Passed
BEC - 8/2015 - Passed
REG - 11/12/2015 - PassedFebruary 23, 2015 at 7:05 pm #654946
excel monkeyParticipantThis is a different question from CPA-01598. CPA-01598 deals with the third forward contract, which it says was for speculation. In that question the entire $3,000 gain on the forward contract is recognized because it is for speculative purposes, not as a hedge.
FAR - 91
AUD - 88
BEC - 86
REG - 79February 23, 2015 at 7:42 pm #654947
slgavin7MemberDoes anyone have a quick summation of when transfers are considered “transfers” vs “other financing sources/uses” for governmental?
February 23, 2015 at 7:44 pm #654948
slgavin7MemberFebruary 23, 2015 at 7:46 pm #654949
excel monkeyParticipantIt's question CPA-01597. However, Becker lists the same $3,000 gain. After rereading the question for the 100th time, and seeing the Becker explanation, I have to agree with them. The question is asking for, and somehow I overlooked it, the amount of the gain from the forward contract that would be recognized in income, not the net effect on income. The entire 3,000 gain on the forward contract would be recognized in income. If the question would have asked for the net effect on income, the answer would have been 0 because the loss on the firm commitment would offset this gain, as I understand it.
Also, I would be interested in seeing the Bisk question with 10K as the answer.
FAR - 91
AUD - 88
BEC - 86
REG - 79February 23, 2015 at 9:37 pm #654950
NATMemberFAR – Research Simulation question:
Is anybody could explain how research sim looks like, is is about computational or simply conceptual ? It would be perfect if FAR-candidates who has “just passed FAR-status” would share their experience. Just give me please some example. Thanks
FAR - 07/2015
AUD - TBD
REG - TBD
BEC -TBDWe suffer one of two things in our life. The pain of discipline or the pain of disappointments.
When you are disciplined, there is no pain of disappointments.February 24, 2015 at 1:03 am #654951
kmhizelbMemberDunne Co. sells equipment service contracts that cover a two year period. The sales price of each contract is $600. Dunne's past experience is that, of the total dollars spent for repairs on service contracts, 40% is incurred during the first contract year and 60% evenly during the second contract year. Dunne sold 1000 contracts evenly throughout the current year. In its Dec 31 balance sheet, what amount should Dunne report as deferred service contract revenue?
Becker shows the calculation as:
Current year deferral (600*1000) = 600,000
Earned in the current year (600,000*40%*1/2) = (120,000)
deferral 12/31 = 480,000
I do not understand why we have to multiply by 1/2. Can anyone explain?
February 24, 2015 at 2:39 am #654952
haseltonkMemberThe explanation I've encountered on similar becker problems before is because sales occurred “evenly throughout the year”. So where a contract sold in January would receive the 40% credit (full 12 mos), whereas a contract sold in December would technically only earn 1/12 of the 40% revenue. To simplify they said to take 1/2 of the annual sales, basically assuming that 1/2 of the sales would occur before and 1/2 would occur after the midpoint of the year, so that would be the average of all sales for the year.
Theoretically you should end up at the same total if you were to work the calculation all the way out month by month. Hope that makes sense.
February 24, 2015 at 3:37 pm #654953
Get_myCPA_2015MemberHi I have the same problem with this question:
On December 12, year 11, Imp Co. entered into three forward exchange contracts, each to purchase 100,000 LCU’s in 90 days. The relevant exchange rates are as follows:
Spot rate Forward rate
(for March 12, year 12)
December 12, year 11 $0.88 $0.90
December 31, year 11 $0.98 $0.93
Imp entered into the second forward contract to hedge a commitment to purchase equipment being manufactured to Imp's specifications. At December 31, year 11, what amount of foreign currency transaction gain should Imp include in income from this forward contract?
A $0
B $3,000
C $5,000
D $10,000
Ninja said: A but Roger said B. Roger said it is a fair value hedge and gains and losses should be recognized in income.
Please could you help me to understand.
I will take my first part FAR 2/26/15.
Thanks.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 53’ is closed to new replies.
