- This topic has 851 replies, 139 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 20, 2014 at 6:24 pm #190225
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 12, 2015 at 5:25 pm #654849
hunter32MemberI try not to do much the day before the exam. At this point I either know it or I don't so I'll probably just do some MCQ later but mainly focus on getting enough sleep.
BEC - 80 (Becker)
AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)February 12, 2015 at 6:50 pm #654850
jbarwickMemberFirst post and I am currently studying for FAR as my first CPA section. Using Becker and am on Leases, Liabilities, and Bonds (F5). Do Bonds ever get easier or do I just do a lot of MCQ's and some items stick?
My current study method is 1 chapter a week. Watch lectures loosely, go over eBook and take notes while trying to understand the topics more in depth, then do the homework after each section. This was useful for F1 – F4 and everything was going good but F5 has been a bear. I should take my first test in early April so I have time but man….this topic is tricky.
Journey Started - January 2015
FAR - 4/2015 - Passed
AUD - 7/2015 - Passed
BEC - 8/2015 - Passed
REG - 11/12/2015 - PassedFebruary 12, 2015 at 7:17 pm #654851
hunter32MemberLeases and Bonds become way, way easier over time. I think I got in the 50's the first time on each and now I can pull out 90 and above on each. I'd learn the journal entries for each. That's what got me over the hump with all of the bond warrant questions.
BEC - 80 (Becker)
AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)February 12, 2015 at 8:43 pm #654852
se7en.14ParticipantFebruary 12, 2015 at 9:20 pm #654853
hunter32MemberFebruary 13, 2015 at 3:39 pm #654854February 13, 2015 at 6:22 pm #654855
ThumbsUpParticipant@Determined CPA I have the Becker Course and the Becker Final Review.
AUD- 22, Just missed it...maybe next time!
REG- 14, so close!!!February 13, 2015 at 9:04 pm #654856
want2passMemberFebruary 13, 2015 at 10:02 pm #654857
stacy_scmParticipant@want2pass my test day is tomorrow and I don't feel ready. Having the jitters actually. Don't think I will ever feel ready for any of these exams.
February 14, 2015 at 2:07 pm #654858
KuhnjmMemberHello, I'm taking FAR next week. I'm frustrated by the wording of some questions. This question says ‘without regard to salary allowances and withdrawals' but then I feel like the answer is totally based on the % of withdrawals. How do you know what they want? What is the point of the word games????
The partnership agreement for the partnership of Mayo and Pack provided for salary allowances of $45,000 to Mayo and $35,000 to Pack, and the residual profit was allocated equally. During year 1, Mayo and Pack each withdrew cash equal to 80 percent of their salary allowances. If during year 1 the partnership had profits in excess of $100,000 without regard to salary allowances and withdrawals, Mayo’s equity in the partnership would
Increase more than Pack’s.
Decrease more than Pack’s.
Increase the same as Pack’s.
Decrease the same as Pack’s.
This answer is incorrect. Each partner withdrew 80% of his/her salary during the year, leaving his/her equity interest to increase by the remaining 20% plus half of the net profit after salaries. Since Mayo’s salary is $10,000 greater than Pack’s, Mayo’s equity interest will increase by $2,000 (20% of $10,000) more than Pack’s.
Thanks for letting me vent!
Reg 73, redo April 2015
FAR Feb 2015
AUD June 2015
BEC Oct 2015
CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.February 14, 2015 at 6:45 pm #654859
KuhnjmMemberHere's another one. Obviously, AP decreased but the answers says that it increased. So what is the right answer, A or D?
Lino Co.’s worksheet for the preparation of its statement of cash flows included the following:
December 31 January 1
Accounts receivable $29,000 $23,000
Allowance for uncollectible accounts 1,000 800
Prepaid rent expense 8,200 12,400
Accounts payable 22,400 25,400
Lino’s net income is $150,000. What amount should Lino include as net cash provided by operating activities in the statement of cash flows?
A.
$151,400
B.
$151,000
C.
$148,600
Incorrect D.
$145,400
You answered D. The correct answer is A.
The $151,400 amount is calculated as follows:
Net income $150,000
Increase in accounts receivable ($23,000 – $29,000) (6,000)
Increase in allowance for uncollectible accounts
($800 – $1,000) 200
Decrease in prepaid rent expense ($12,400 – $8,200) 4,200
Increase in accounts payable ($25,400 – $22,400) 3,000
Cash provided by operating activities $151,400
Reg 73, redo April 2015
FAR Feb 2015
AUD June 2015
BEC Oct 2015
CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.February 14, 2015 at 6:49 pm #654860
Determined CPAParticipantKuhnjm – Jeff knows about this one. You're right.
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 14, 2015 at 7:07 pm #654861
KuhnjmMemberThank you! on another note, i bought Ninja CPA review not knowing that the exact questions were included in my CPAExcel course. How dumb was that? Not that either are helping me. i need a miracle.
Reg 73, redo April 2015
FAR Feb 2015
AUD June 2015
BEC Oct 2015
CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.February 14, 2015 at 7:44 pm #654862
KuhnjmMemberHello again, here's a sim that discusses patents. In an earlier line on this sim, it mentioned that the patent received an unfavorable judgment. Then it goes on to record the amortization. I thought that patents were reversed when they received an unfavorable judgment. Can anyone clear this up for me?
October 1, Year 1:
Richter received an unfavorable judgment in defense of a trademark and paid $25,000 in fees to their law firm. Prepare the journal entry, if any, to record the legal fees.
Account Name Debit Credit
Legal Expense 25,000 –
Cash – 25,000
No entry required – –
No entry required – –
December 31, Year 1:
Prepare the journal entry, if any, to account for the patent purchased on April 1, Year 1.
Account Name Debit Credit
Amortization Expense 3,750 –
Accumulated Amortization – Patent – 3,750
No entry required – –
No entry required – –
The patent has a 10-year useful life. Thus, the patent cost must be amortized over this time. Salvage for intangibles is usually 0, and straight-line is used in this company. The patent cost of $50,000 is thus divided by 10 years to give an amortization cost of $5,000 each year, but since the patent was only used from April on, it was only used for 9/12 of the year: 9/12 of $5,000 is $3,750.
FASB ASC 350-30-35-6
(The references for this question are sections 2213.47–.48 and 2230.34–.40 in the Financial Accounting and Reporting Reference Volume.)
Reg 73, redo April 2015
FAR Feb 2015
AUD June 2015
BEC Oct 2015
CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.February 15, 2015 at 2:56 am #654863
JS867_5309MemberHey everybody! I'm studying for an early Q2 exam, and I'm starting to think the majority of this exam is going to be wording semantics. Can anyone help me with this question?
Q: A combination is accounted for as an acquisition (initiated in a fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008). Which of the following would be considered part of the acquisition cost of an acquired entity in a business combination?
I. Costs incurred by the acquiring entity that are directly related to the acquisition
II. Costs incurred by the acquired entity that are directly related to the acquisition
III. Indirect acquisition costs incurred by the acquiring entity
I answered One only, but the answer says “None of these items would be part of the requisition cost.” The justification is:
“FASB ASC 805-10-25-21 requires that acquisition-related costs be charged to expense. All of these costs are acquisition-related costs and should be expensed in the period incurred.Acquisition-related costs are costs the acquirer incurs to effect a business combination. Those costs include finder's fees; advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees; general administrative costs, including the costs of maintaining an internal acquisitions department; and costs of registering and issuing debt and equity securities. The acquirer shall account for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception. The costs to issue debt or equity securities shall be recognized in accordance with other applicable GAAP.”
So I guess I'm confused. The question wasn't asking about expensed vs amortized, just about what was considered acquisition cost. The items described in the answer sound like Answer I – Costs incurred by the acquiring entity directly related to the acquisition. What am I missing?
Exam:I'm done 🙂 🙂 🙂
REG - 71 (2/22/14); 67 (4/3/14); 74 (8/29/15); 83 (2/29/16)!!!
BEC - 72 (5/24/14); 85 (1/3/15)!!!!
AUD - 72 (8/23/14); 76 (10/15/14)!!!
FAR - 77 (5/26/15)!!!Started in 2013 using Kaplan and failed REG, REG, BEC, AUD. Switched to NINJA suite in Sept 2014 and passed AUD...then BEC...then FAR!
REG took 2 tries but I finally got it in too!
I'm a hard convert - Using NINJA method with NINJA video/book/notes/MCQEducation: Check
Experience: 3 months left! I hit 4 years on May 30 🙂 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 47’ is closed to new replies.
