FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 47

Viewing 15 replies - 691 through 705 (of 851 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #654849
    hunter32
    Member

    I try not to do much the day before the exam. At this point I either know it or I don't so I'll probably just do some MCQ later but mainly focus on getting enough sleep.

    BEC - 80 (Becker)
    AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)

    #654850
    jbarwick
    Member

    First post and I am currently studying for FAR as my first CPA section. Using Becker and am on Leases, Liabilities, and Bonds (F5). Do Bonds ever get easier or do I just do a lot of MCQ's and some items stick?

    My current study method is 1 chapter a week. Watch lectures loosely, go over eBook and take notes while trying to understand the topics more in depth, then do the homework after each section. This was useful for F1 – F4 and everything was going good but F5 has been a bear. I should take my first test in early April so I have time but man….this topic is tricky.

    Journey Started - January 2015
    FAR - 4/2015 - Passed
    AUD - 7/2015 - Passed
    BEC - 8/2015 - Passed
    REG - 11/12/2015 - Passed

    #654851
    hunter32
    Member

    Leases and Bonds become way, way easier over time. I think I got in the 50's the first time on each and now I can pull out 90 and above on each. I'd learn the journal entries for each. That's what got me over the hump with all of the bond warrant questions.

    BEC - 80 (Becker)
    AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)

    #654852
    se7en.14
    Participant

    I got a question on Whole life insurance in the NINJA MCQs, where is this discussed in the Becker review book? maybe i just dont remember or skipped it some how?

    Thanks

    #654853
    hunter32
    Member

    It's really not covered in Becker at all. I wouldn't worry too much about it. Not that it's all a bad thing but I've noticed Ninja has some obscure questions that seem out of left field

    BEC - 80 (Becker)
    AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)

    #654854
    se7en.14
    Participant

    @hunter32 , thanks

    #654855
    ThumbsUp
    Participant

    @Determined CPA I have the Becker Course and the Becker Final Review.

    AUD- 22, Just missed it...maybe next time!
    REG- 14, so close!!!

    #654856
    want2pass
    Member

    Test day is in about a week, and I do not feel comfortable with the material. Is this normal for FAR?

    #654857
    stacy_scm
    Participant

    @want2pass my test day is tomorrow and I don't feel ready. Having the jitters actually. Don't think I will ever feel ready for any of these exams.

    #654858
    Kuhnjm
    Member

    Hello, I'm taking FAR next week. I'm frustrated by the wording of some questions. This question says ‘without regard to salary allowances and withdrawals' but then I feel like the answer is totally based on the % of withdrawals. How do you know what they want? What is the point of the word games????

    The partnership agreement for the partnership of Mayo and Pack provided for salary allowances of $45,000 to Mayo and $35,000 to Pack, and the residual profit was allocated equally. During year 1, Mayo and Pack each withdrew cash equal to 80 percent of their salary allowances. If during year 1 the partnership had profits in excess of $100,000 without regard to salary allowances and withdrawals, Mayo’s equity in the partnership would

    Increase more than Pack’s.

    Decrease more than Pack’s.

    Increase the same as Pack’s.

    Decrease the same as Pack’s.

    This answer is incorrect. Each partner withdrew 80% of his/her salary during the year, leaving his/her equity interest to increase by the remaining 20% plus half of the net profit after salaries. Since Mayo’s salary is $10,000 greater than Pack’s, Mayo’s equity interest will increase by $2,000 (20% of $10,000) more than Pack’s.

    Thanks for letting me vent!

    Reg 73, redo April 2015
    FAR Feb 2015
    AUD June 2015
    BEC Oct 2015
    CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.

    #654859
    Kuhnjm
    Member

    Here's another one. Obviously, AP decreased but the answers says that it increased. So what is the right answer, A or D?

    Lino Co.’s worksheet for the preparation of its statement of cash flows included the following:

    December 31 January 1

    Accounts receivable $29,000 $23,000

    Allowance for uncollectible accounts 1,000 800

    Prepaid rent expense 8,200 12,400

    Accounts payable 22,400 25,400

    Lino’s net income is $150,000. What amount should Lino include as net cash provided by operating activ­ities in the statement of cash flows?

    A.

    $151,400

    B.

    $151,000

    C.

    $148,600

    Incorrect D.

    $145,400

    You answered D. The correct answer is A.

    The $151,400 amount is calculated as follows:

    Net income $150,000

    Increase in accounts receivable ($23,000 – $29,000) (6,000)

    Increase in allowance for uncollectible accounts

    ($800 – $1,000) 200

    Decrease in prepaid rent expense ($12,400 – $8,200) 4,200

    Increase in accounts payable ($25,400 – $22,400) 3,000


    Cash provided by operating activities $151,400

    Reg 73, redo April 2015
    FAR Feb 2015
    AUD June 2015
    BEC Oct 2015
    CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.

    #654860
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    Kuhnjm – Jeff knows about this one. You're right.

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654861
    Kuhnjm
    Member

    Thank you! on another note, i bought Ninja CPA review not knowing that the exact questions were included in my CPAExcel course. How dumb was that? Not that either are helping me. i need a miracle.

    Reg 73, redo April 2015
    FAR Feb 2015
    AUD June 2015
    BEC Oct 2015
    CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.

    #654862
    Kuhnjm
    Member

    Hello again, here's a sim that discusses patents. In an earlier line on this sim, it mentioned that the patent received an unfavorable judgment. Then it goes on to record the amortization. I thought that patents were reversed when they received an unfavorable judgment. Can anyone clear this up for me?

    October 1, Year 1:

    Richter received an unfavorable judgment in defense of a trademark and paid $25,000 in fees to their law firm. Prepare the journal entry, if any, to record the legal fees.

    Account Name Debit Credit

    Legal Expense 25,000 –

    Cash – 25,000

    No entry required – –

    No entry required – –

    December 31, Year 1:

    Prepare the journal entry, if any, to account for the patent purchased on April 1, Year 1.

    Account Name Debit Credit

    Amortization Expense 3,750 –

    Accumulated Amortization – Patent – 3,750

    No entry required – –

    No entry required – –

    The patent has a 10-year useful life. Thus, the patent cost must be amortized over this time. Salvage for intangibles is usually 0, and straight-line is used in this company. The patent cost of $50,000 is thus divided by 10 years to give an amortization cost of $5,000 each year, but since the patent was only used from April on, it was only used for 9/12 of the year: 9/12 of $5,000 is $3,750.

    FASB ASC 350-30-35-6

    (The references for this question are sections 2213.47–.48 and 2230.34–.40 in the Financial Accounting and Reporting Reference Volume.)

    Reg 73, redo April 2015
    FAR Feb 2015
    AUD June 2015
    BEC Oct 2015
    CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.

    #654863
    JS867_5309
    Member

    Hey everybody! I'm studying for an early Q2 exam, and I'm starting to think the majority of this exam is going to be wording semantics. Can anyone help me with this question?

    Q: A combination is accounted for as an acquisition (initiated in a fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008). Which of the following would be considered part of the acquisition cost of an acquired entity in a business combination?

    I. Costs incurred by the acquiring entity that are directly related to the acquisition

    II. Costs incurred by the acquired entity that are directly related to the acquisition

    III. Indirect acquisition costs incurred by the acquiring entity

    I answered One only, but the answer says “None of these items would be part of the requisition cost.” The justification is:

    “FASB ASC 805-10-25-21 requires that acquisition-related costs be charged to expense. All of these costs are acquisition-related costs and should be expensed in the period incurred.Acquisition-related costs are costs the acquirer incurs to effect a business combination. Those costs include finder's fees; advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees; general administrative costs, including the costs of maintaining an internal acquisitions department; and costs of registering and issuing debt and equity securities. The acquirer shall account for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception. The costs to issue debt or equity securities shall be recognized in accordance with other applicable GAAP.”

    So I guess I'm confused. The question wasn't asking about expensed vs amortized, just about what was considered acquisition cost. The items described in the answer sound like Answer I – Costs incurred by the acquiring entity directly related to the acquisition. What am I missing?

    Exam:I'm done 🙂 🙂 🙂
    REG - 71 (2/22/14); 67 (4/3/14); 74 (8/29/15); 83 (2/29/16)!!!
    BEC - 72 (5/24/14); 85 (1/3/15)!!!!
    AUD - 72 (8/23/14); 76 (10/15/14)!!!
    FAR - 77 (5/26/15)!!!

    Started in 2013 using Kaplan and failed REG, REG, BEC, AUD. Switched to NINJA suite in Sept 2014 and passed AUD...then BEC...then FAR!
    REG took 2 tries but I finally got it in too!
    I'm a hard convert - Using NINJA method with NINJA video/book/notes/MCQ

    Education: Check
    Experience: 3 months left! I hit 4 years on May 30 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 691 through 705 (of 851 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 47’ is closed to new replies.