FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 44

Viewing 15 replies - 646 through 660 (of 851 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #654803
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    So the rule is that infrastructure expenditures are reported as expenses and any cash outlay that results in an additions or improvements is capitalized which would be capitalized? But is this saying this happens on the govt wide statements?

    I guess im confused where we capitalize these improvements?

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654804
    excel monkey
    Participant

    I agree with slgavin7. After re-reading your questions, I think you're confusing modified accrual with the modified approach. Their separate concepts.

    FAR - 91
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 86
    REG - 79

    #654805
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    excel monkey – can you send the link you're using? Im still finding post benefit plans – what is wrong with me?!

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654806
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    excel monkey – can you explain this to me so I understand? Am I correct in my thinking that for governmental accounting, under the modified approach, you record expenditures, not expenses, and do not capitalize anything. And then during the reconciliation between fund f/s and govt wide f/s, that's when we show depreciation, capitalization?

    And I found the GASB paragraph – thank you for helping with that.

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654807
    excel monkey
    Participant

    https://www.gasb.org/resources/ccurl/1019/897/GASBS%2034.pdf

    You're partially correct, the governmental funds would report expenditures, not expenses under modified ACCRUAL. The depreciation/capitalization becomes a reconciliation issues. The modified APPROACH deals exclusively with infrastructure assets and whether to capitalize them or not in the government-wide financials.

    FAR - 91
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 86
    REG - 79

    #654808
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    I think I got it!!!

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654809
    Merz721
    Member

    Howdy All –

    New to the forums…looking to take FAR at the end of this month (whew! only 22 more study days) and I've just finished writing the NINJA notes and I've not yet gotten into the CPA Excel material. This weekend will be long!!! Took REG on Jan 26th so I'm awaiting that score. Any suggestions on target material given the short timeframe? I suppose I could take the additional time and test in April as opposed to giving attention to a hail mary effort! Any thoughts SMEs' (subject matter experts)?

    #654810
    hunter32
    Member

    Thanks, DeterminedCPA. Unfortunately I cannot get away from work which mean I'll be doing MCQ till I drop both today and tomorrow.

    BEC - 80 (Becker)
    AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)

    #654811
    Boate
    Participant

    Anyone who's taken this exam once before, what are the chances of see ing dollar value LIFO? I was never taught this in school and Roger mentions it is rarely tested. the only reason I ask is while I go through my studies I like to make note of what is more heavily tested so while I go through my final review it consists of mainly those items. I did that for AUD the last time i took it and it worked so figured I'd implement the same strategy.

    AUD: (65)(66) 77
    REG: (66) (48) destroyed me mentally.....
    FAR: (68) (66)(69)(71)
    BEC: (63) 75

    "Greatness is not some precious thing, it is no more unique to us than breathing. We are ALL capable of it."

    #654812
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    Red and White formed a partnership in 20X1. The partnership agreement provides for annual salary allowances of $55,000 for Red and $45,000 for White. The partners share profits equally and losses in a 60/40 ratio. The partnership had earnings of $80,000 for 20X1 before any allowance to partners. What amount of these earnings should be credited to each partner's capital account?

    Answer: Red: $43,000; White: $37,000

    Salaries are paid (as an expense) to the partners before partnership earnings are allocated:

    Allocation


    Earnings

    To Red To White Total Balance





    $80,000

    Salary allowance $55,000 $45,000 $100,000 (20,000)

    Loss allocation

    To Red (.6 x $20,000) (12,000) (12,000) ( 8,000)

    To White (.4 x $20,000) (8,000) (8,000) 0




    ========

    Totals $43,000 $37,000 $ 80,000

    ======== ======== =========

    The question asks for the earnings – why isn't it 50/50? I picked 40,000 to each.

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654813
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Distribute first the agreed salaries to each partner, then prorate anything that's left over. If the left-over is positive, that's profit, divide it equally. But since the result above yields negative $20,000 (Partners' salaries of $100k – Actual Profit of $80k), you split it at agreed rate of 60% and 40% loss sharing.

    #654814
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    Got it – thank you! Seems more like a reg question, right? Thanks again!

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654815
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    60% FAR and 40% REG, LOL!

    And 99% AUD. And 101% BEC.

    It's a combination of everything from early accounting classes.

    #654816
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    Thanks for helping even though you passed FAR already! I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. – I love that quote.

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654818
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    For anyone who has the updated 2015 Ninja notes – I have a couple of questions I was hoping someone could help with:

    1. IFRS question on page 15 and 16

    On page 15 – Fixed assets under IFRS using the revaluation model states that increases in value from the adjustment go to OCI and decreases go to the income statement as an expense. However, on page 16, under investment property, its says that PP&E P/L = OCI. Doesn't that go against what page 15 is saying? I thought increase = OCI and decrease = expense. This is saying both go to OCI. Any thoughts?

    2. Financial reporting on page 31

    Bottom of the page goes into interest expense on internally used software projects, and states that interest on this is capitalized. So just to make sure I understand this:

    – computer software developed internally is expensed until the preliminary phase, and then capitalized (this is how I understand the material from Becker)

    – but all interest on these projects is capitalized regardless of which phase?

    Sorry for the long, boring post. Just trying to understand these concepts.

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

Viewing 15 replies - 646 through 660 (of 851 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 44’ is closed to new replies.