- This topic has 851 replies, 139 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 20, 2014 at 6:24 pm #190225
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 6, 2015 at 5:38 pm #654803
Determined CPAParticipantughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
So the rule is that infrastructure expenditures are reported as expenses and any cash outlay that results in an additions or improvements is capitalized which would be capitalized? But is this saying this happens on the govt wide statements?
I guess im confused where we capitalize these improvements?
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 6, 2015 at 5:39 pm #654804
excel monkeyParticipantI agree with slgavin7. After re-reading your questions, I think you're confusing modified accrual with the modified approach. Their separate concepts.
FAR - 91
AUD - 88
BEC - 86
REG - 79February 6, 2015 at 5:41 pm #654805
Determined CPAParticipantexcel monkey – can you send the link you're using? Im still finding post benefit plans – what is wrong with me?!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 6, 2015 at 5:44 pm #654806
Determined CPAParticipantexcel monkey – can you explain this to me so I understand? Am I correct in my thinking that for governmental accounting, under the modified approach, you record expenditures, not expenses, and do not capitalize anything. And then during the reconciliation between fund f/s and govt wide f/s, that's when we show depreciation, capitalization?
And I found the GASB paragraph – thank you for helping with that.
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 6, 2015 at 5:58 pm #654807
excel monkeyParticipanthttps://www.gasb.org/resources/ccurl/1019/897/GASBS%2034.pdf
You're partially correct, the governmental funds would report expenditures, not expenses under modified ACCRUAL. The depreciation/capitalization becomes a reconciliation issues. The modified APPROACH deals exclusively with infrastructure assets and whether to capitalize them or not in the government-wide financials.
FAR - 91
AUD - 88
BEC - 86
REG - 79February 6, 2015 at 6:11 pm #654808
Determined CPAParticipantI think I got it!!!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 7, 2015 at 4:00 am #654809
Merz721MemberHowdy All –
New to the forums…looking to take FAR at the end of this month (whew! only 22 more study days) and I've just finished writing the NINJA notes and I've not yet gotten into the CPA Excel material. This weekend will be long!!! Took REG on Jan 26th so I'm awaiting that score. Any suggestions on target material given the short timeframe? I suppose I could take the additional time and test in April as opposed to giving attention to a hail mary effort! Any thoughts SMEs' (subject matter experts)?
February 7, 2015 at 2:30 pm #654810
hunter32MemberThanks, DeterminedCPA. Unfortunately I cannot get away from work which mean I'll be doing MCQ till I drop both today and tomorrow.
BEC - 80 (Becker)
AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)February 7, 2015 at 4:07 pm #654811
BoateParticipantAnyone who's taken this exam once before, what are the chances of see ing dollar value LIFO? I was never taught this in school and Roger mentions it is rarely tested. the only reason I ask is while I go through my studies I like to make note of what is more heavily tested so while I go through my final review it consists of mainly those items. I did that for AUD the last time i took it and it worked so figured I'd implement the same strategy.
AUD: (65)(66) 77
REG: (66) (48) destroyed me mentally.....
FAR: (68) (66)(69)(71)
BEC: (63) 75"Greatness is not some precious thing, it is no more unique to us than breathing. We are ALL capable of it."
February 7, 2015 at 11:14 pm #654812
Determined CPAParticipantRed and White formed a partnership in 20X1. The partnership agreement provides for annual salary allowances of $55,000 for Red and $45,000 for White. The partners share profits equally and losses in a 60/40 ratio. The partnership had earnings of $80,000 for 20X1 before any allowance to partners. What amount of these earnings should be credited to each partner's capital account?
Answer: Red: $43,000; White: $37,000
Salaries are paid (as an expense) to the partners before partnership earnings are allocated:
Allocation
EarningsTo Red To White Total Balance
$80,000
Salary allowance $55,000 $45,000 $100,000 (20,000)
Loss allocation
To Red (.6 x $20,000) (12,000) (12,000) ( 8,000)
To White (.4 x $20,000) (8,000) (8,000) 0
========Totals $43,000 $37,000 $ 80,000
======== ======== =========
The question asks for the earnings – why isn't it 50/50? I picked 40,000 to each.
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 7, 2015 at 11:26 pm #654813
AnonymousInactiveDistribute first the agreed salaries to each partner, then prorate anything that's left over. If the left-over is positive, that's profit, divide it equally. But since the result above yields negative $20,000 (Partners' salaries of $100k – Actual Profit of $80k), you split it at agreed rate of 60% and 40% loss sharing.
February 7, 2015 at 11:29 pm #654814
Determined CPAParticipantGot it – thank you! Seems more like a reg question, right? Thanks again!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 7, 2015 at 11:33 pm #654815
AnonymousInactiveFebruary 7, 2015 at 11:37 pm #654816
Determined CPAParticipantThanks for helping even though you passed FAR already! I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. – I love that quote.
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.February 8, 2015 at 3:33 am #654818
Determined CPAParticipantFor anyone who has the updated 2015 Ninja notes – I have a couple of questions I was hoping someone could help with:
1. IFRS question on page 15 and 16
On page 15 – Fixed assets under IFRS using the revaluation model states that increases in value from the adjustment go to OCI and decreases go to the income statement as an expense. However, on page 16, under investment property, its says that PP&E P/L = OCI. Doesn't that go against what page 15 is saying? I thought increase = OCI and decrease = expense. This is saying both go to OCI. Any thoughts?
2. Financial reporting on page 31
Bottom of the page goes into interest expense on internally used software projects, and states that interest on this is capitalized. So just to make sure I understand this:
– computer software developed internally is expensed until the preliminary phase, and then capitalized (this is how I understand the material from Becker)
– but all interest on these projects is capitalized regardless of which phase?
Sorry for the long, boring post. Just trying to understand these concepts.
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen. -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 44’ is closed to new replies.
