- This topic has 851 replies, 139 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 20, 2014 at 6:24 pm #190225
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
January 16, 2015 at 9:50 pm #654605
SkilletCPAParticipantWOOHOO!! My responses were correct!! 🙂
BEC Pass
AUD Pass
REG Pass
FAR PassJanuary 16, 2015 at 9:51 pm #654606
SkilletCPAParticipantunfortunately I didn't win 🙁
BEC Pass
AUD Pass
REG Pass
FAR PassJanuary 16, 2015 at 10:23 pm #654607
jeffKeymasterJanuary 16, 2015 at 11:04 pm #654608
SkilletCPAParticipantwell then double 🙁
BEC Pass
AUD Pass
REG Pass
FAR PassJanuary 17, 2015 at 4:14 pm #654609
AnonymousInactiveAlmost go time. Let's hope all the work I put in this time pays off. Thanks to everyone for the help over the last month. Time to slay “the beast” a.k.a FAR.
January 17, 2015 at 5:06 pm #654610
Determined CPAParticipantGood luck CTM!!!! You got this!!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.January 17, 2015 at 5:44 pm #654611
Determined CPAParticipantOn December 31, 20X1, Dahlia, a nongovernmental not-for-profit entity, purchased a vehicle with $15,000 unrestricted cash and received a donated second vehicle having a fair value of $12,000. Dahlia expects each vehicle to provide it with equal service value over each of the next five years and with no residual value. Dahlia has an accounting policy implying a time restriction on gifts of long-lived assets. In Dahlia's 20X2 statement of financial position, what amount of temporarily restricted net assets would relate to the donated vehicle?
Answer is 9,600 – I picked 0
explanation – Nongovernmental not-for-profit entities may adopt an accounting policy recognizing a time restriction on assets provided by donors for the entity's use. The residual value of the asset, after annual depreciation, would therefore be recognized as temporarily restricted assets. The annual depreciation is recognized as an expense, shown as a reduction of unrestricted assets. Annual depreciation is also shown as a reduction in the value of the asset. As the asset is reduced in value, the amount of associated temporarily restricted net assets is also reduced. This requires a reduction of temporarily restricted net assets shown as “net assets released from restrictions” on the statement of activities.
Therefore, one year's depreciation of the donated vehicle ($12,000 ÷ 5 years, or $2,400) would reduce its residual value to $9,600 ($12,000 – $2,400).
My question is, I thought if the NFP entity itself put restrictions on the asset, it is still unrestricted. Why is this considered temp restricted bc the NFP entity puts a time restriction on it?
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.January 17, 2015 at 6:11 pm #654612
KuhnjmMemberBetween CPAexcel and Ninja CPA Review, I have done 90 problems today. 55% isn't so good but I have faith that I am learning. My exam is in 5 weeks. How is everyone else doing?
Reg 73, redo April 2015
FAR Feb 2015
AUD June 2015
BEC Oct 2015
CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.January 17, 2015 at 7:56 pm #654613
imgonnabacpaMemberJanuary 17, 2015 at 7:56 pm #654614
imgonnabacpaMemberJanuary 17, 2015 at 10:07 pm #654615
imgonnabacpaMemberHey, can someone please help me understand the installment sales method. Enclosed is the question from becker.
ince there is no reasonable basis for estimating the degree of collectibility, Astor Co. uses the installment method of revenue recognition for the following sales:
Year 2 Year 1
Sales $ 900,000 $ 600,000
Collections from:
Year 1 sales 100,000 200,000
Year 2 sales 300,000 –
Accounts written off:
Year 1 sales 150,000 50,000
Year 2 sales 50,000 –
Gross profit percentage 40% 30%
What amount should Astor report as deferred gross profit in its December 31, Year 2, balance sheet for the Year 1 and Year 2 sales?
a.
$250,000
b.
$225,000
c.
$160,000
d.
$150,000
Explanation
Choice “a” is correct. The total deferred gross profit equals the deferred gross profit from Year 1 sales plus the deferred gross profit from Year 2 sales.
Year 2 Year 1
Sales $ 900,000 $ 600,000
Collections:
Year 1 sales (300,000)
Year 2 sales (300,000)
Written off:
Year 1 sales (200,000)
Year 2 sales (50,000)
Installment receivable 550,000 100,000
GP % 40% 30%
Deferred gross profit $ 220,000 $ 30,000
Total deferred gross profit = $30,000 + $220,000 = $250,000
Choices “d”, “c”, and “b” are incorrect. The total deferred gross profit equals the deferred gross profit from Year 1 sales plus the deferred gross profit from Year 2 sales.
My Doubt : Why do we have to deduct the writeoff amount ? Why can we not take the collections amount and calculate gross profit on it,?
Thanks
BEC - 78
AUD - 69,72,78
FAR - 73, 77
REG - 74, 74, April 20(Monday). Not anymore (Fingers Crossed xxxxx)January 18, 2015 at 3:03 pm #654616
KuhnjmMemberCan someone help me understand why 6% is used for both 20×1 and 20×2 for this problem? Why wouldn't it be 4% and 2% respectively?
During 20X1, Gum Co. introduced a new product carrying a 2-year warranty against defects. The estimated warranty costs related to dollar sales are 2% within 12 months following the sale and 4% in the second 12 months following the sale. Sales and actual warranty expenditures for the years ending December 31, 20X1 and 20X2, are as follows:
Sales Actual Warranty Expenditures
20X1 $150,000 $2,250
20X2 250,000 7,500
$400,000 $9,750
======== ======
What amount should Gum report as estimated warranty liability in its December 31, 20X2, balance sheet?
A.
$2,500
B.
$4,250
Incorrect C.
$11,250
D.
$14,250
You answered C. The correct answer is D.
Estimated warranty expense (20X1 sales) = .06 x $150,000 = $ 9,000
Estimated warranty expense (20X2 sales) = .06 x $250,000 = 15,000
Total estimated warranty expense $24,000
Less actual warranty expenditures 9,750
Estimated warranty liability on December 31, 20X2 $14,250
Reg 73, redo April 2015
FAR Feb 2015
AUD June 2015
BEC Oct 2015
CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.January 18, 2015 at 3:22 pm #654617
KuhnjmMemberI'm trying to use the authoritative research feature in Ninja CPA Review and it doesn't search very well. Is there a secret? CPAexcel's search feature is much easier to use and more like the actual CPA exam.
Reg 73, redo April 2015
FAR Feb 2015
AUD June 2015
BEC Oct 2015
CPA, the marathon of all marathons...I can do this.January 18, 2015 at 4:43 pm #654618
hunter32MemberJanuary 18, 2015 at 5:00 pm #654619 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 31’ is closed to new replies.
