FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 84

  • This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
Viewing 15 replies - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,757 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #477246

    I've found the best way to tackle the depreciation problems is to make up some numbers. Just take regular straight-line depreciation and replace the numerator with a 2 for double declining balance or 1.5 for 150% declining balance.

    100,000 X (2/4) = 50,000 (Or 100,000 X 50%)

    <50,000> prior year depreciation

    = 50,000 remaining base X (2/4) = 25,000

    Therefore, the year 2 depreciation would be 25,000 or [X(50%)(50%)]

    BEC 85
    AUD 99
    REG 88
    FAR 93

    #477176
    nbad311
    Member

    I almost always plug dummy numbers in questions like that! Its definitely helpful for me.

    REG - 65, 70, 80!
    BEC - 35, 62, 79!
    AUD - 73, 75!
    FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.

    #477248
    nbad311
    Member

    I almost always plug dummy numbers in questions like that! Its definitely helpful for me.

    REG - 65, 70, 80!
    BEC - 35, 62, 79!
    AUD - 73, 75!
    FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.

    #477178
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I tried when originally working the problem and sill couldnt understand it 🙁

    #477250
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I tried when originally working the problem and sill couldnt understand it 🙁

    #477180
    ndpendentbw
    Member

    @iwantmylifeback – thank you for responding. I am still a lil fuzzy with this portion of the problem

    “You take the ownership % times earnings – dividends to get 200,000”. If i plug in the numbers as follows:

    earnings = $600k x 50%

    =$300k

    #477182
    ndpendentbw
    Member

    @iwantmylifeback – thank you for responding. I am still a lil fuzzy with this portion of the problem

    “You take the ownership % times earnings – dividends to get 200,000”. If i plug in the numbers as follows:

    earnings = $600k x 50%

    =$300k

    #477254
    ndpendentbw
    Member

    @iwantmylifeback – thank you for responding. I am still a lil fuzzy with this portion of the problem

    “You take the ownership % times earnings – dividends to get 200,000”. If i plug in the numbers as follows:

    earnings = $600k x 50%

    =$300k

    #477252
    ndpendentbw
    Member

    @iwantmylifeback – thank you for responding. I am still a lil fuzzy with this portion of the problem

    “You take the ownership % times earnings – dividends to get 200,000”. If i plug in the numbers as follows:

    earnings = $600k x 50%

    =$300k

    #477184
    ndpendentbw
    Member

    i think i need to type my response in word and then copy into post so i can stop posting in pieces… sorry all.

    after you calculate the $300k as your portion of ownership interest how do you get to the $200k?

    i am clearly looking at this completely wrong.

    #477256
    ndpendentbw
    Member

    i think i need to type my response in word and then copy into post so i can stop posting in pieces… sorry all.

    after you calculate the $300k as your portion of ownership interest how do you get to the $200k?

    i am clearly looking at this completely wrong.

    #477186
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    @Ndpend Basically of the 300k in earnings you have, 240,000 will never be taxed by the government, so this portion is a Permanent difference. The 60,000 difference will be taxed by the government sometime in the future, so this is a temporary difference. Deferred taxes only arise because of temporary differences, so we should only account for the 60,000 difference. The 60,000 * the tax rate of 30% gives you a deferred tax liability of 18,000. For the 100,000 in dividends received (200,000*50%), you will only have to pay tax on 20% of that amount. So 100,000 * 20%= 20,000

    20,000 *30%= 6,000 Deferred tax asset. So you have a deferred liability of 18,000 and a deferred tax asset of 6,000. You net them out and end up with a deferred liability of 12,000.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #477258
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    @Ndpend Basically of the 300k in earnings you have, 240,000 will never be taxed by the government, so this portion is a Permanent difference. The 60,000 difference will be taxed by the government sometime in the future, so this is a temporary difference. Deferred taxes only arise because of temporary differences, so we should only account for the 60,000 difference. The 60,000 * the tax rate of 30% gives you a deferred tax liability of 18,000. For the 100,000 in dividends received (200,000*50%), you will only have to pay tax on 20% of that amount. So 100,000 * 20%= 20,000

    20,000 *30%= 6,000 Deferred tax asset. So you have a deferred liability of 18,000 and a deferred tax asset of 6,000. You net them out and end up with a deferred liability of 12,000.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #477188
    Jigar
    Member

    Can anyone know how to answer RESEARCH Question for FAR? I tried couple of them in wiley but I am struggling to get the right answers.

    Is ther any techiniques?

    Plz Help…

    #477260
    Jigar
    Member

    Can anyone know how to answer RESEARCH Question for FAR? I tried couple of them in wiley but I am struggling to get the right answers.

    Is ther any techiniques?

    Plz Help…

Viewing 15 replies - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,757 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 84’ is closed to new replies.