FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 75

  • This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
Viewing 15 replies - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 1,757 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #477038
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry to answer your questions $210k is correct:

    Inv. in stock $75k

    HC of property $120k

    plus: major improvement $15k

    Also if you look at value of improvement versus cost to purchase the property you can tell it was a major repair (15/120=12.5% of property cost).

    So you would Dr Asset $15k

    #477106
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry to answer your questions $210k is correct:

    Inv. in stock $75k

    HC of property $120k

    plus: major improvement $15k

    Also if you look at value of improvement versus cost to purchase the property you can tell it was a major repair (15/120=12.5% of property cost).

    So you would Dr Asset $15k

    #477040
    NotAgain
    Member

    I still don't understand why you would include the $15K in the year 3 statement of financial condition, when the problem states that the improvements were done in year 9.

    I completely understand the reasoning behind including it on the statement of financial condition for year 9, but how can you possibly include something that didn't happen until SIX YEARS LATER???

    Not trying to be dense here… hahaha! Thanks.

    #477108
    NotAgain
    Member

    I still don't understand why you would include the $15K in the year 3 statement of financial condition, when the problem states that the improvements were done in year 9.

    I completely understand the reasoning behind including it on the statement of financial condition for year 9, but how can you possibly include something that didn't happen until SIX YEARS LATER???

    Not trying to be dense here… hahaha! Thanks.

    #477042
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Thanks @DJN, Monir, Elia, and NBA for the support. Really appreciate it. Good luck to you when you take your test..

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #477110
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Thanks @DJN, Monir, Elia, and NBA for the support. Really appreciate it. Good luck to you when you take your test..

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #477044
    big K
    Member

    PLEASE HELP!

    I need to sharpen up on my journal entry skills – the Becker books show some, but I am hoping I can practice some problems. Does Yaeger, Wiley or any other testing prep course offer this?

    Thanks,

    #477112
    big K
    Member

    PLEASE HELP!

    I need to sharpen up on my journal entry skills – the Becker books show some, but I am hoping I can practice some problems. Does Yaeger, Wiley or any other testing prep course offer this?

    Thanks,

    #477046
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @NotAgain sorry. And yes, probably since there are loads of other typos.

    @big K, Wiley test bank works good supplement to Becker. And its also reasonable and probably you can get cheaper 2012 on Amazon.

    #477114
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @NotAgain sorry. And yes, probably since there are loads of other typos.

    @big K, Wiley test bank works good supplement to Becker. And its also reasonable and probably you can get cheaper 2012 on Amazon.

    #477048
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    stumped on this one

    Tag Question

    On January 2, 2005, to better reflect the variable use of its only machine, Holly, Inc. elects to change its method of depreciation from the straight-line method to the units-of-production method. The original cost of the machine on January 2, 2003, is $50,000, and its estimated life is ten years. Holly estimates that the machine's total life is 50,000 machine hours.

    Machine-hour usage was 8,500 during 2004 and 3,500 during 2003. Machine-hour usage for 2005 is 3,800.

    Holly's income tax rate is 30%. Holly should report the accounting change in its 2005 financial statements as a(an)

    A. Estimate change recognizing $3,800 of depreciation in 2005.

    B. Estimate change recognizing $4,000 of depreciation in 2005.

    C. Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $1,400 in its income statement.

    D. Adjustment to beginning retained earnings of $1,400.

    Correct!

    A change in depreciation method is accounted for as an estimate change. The remaining book value at the beginning of the year of change is allocated over the remaining useful life using the new method.

    Book value January 1, 2005 = $50,000 – ($50,000/10)2 = $40,000.

    Estimated remaining machine hours at January 1, 2005 = $50,000 – $8,500 – $3,500 = $38,000.

    Depreciation expense for 2005 = $3,800($40,000/$38,000) = $4,000.

    #477116
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    stumped on this one

    Tag Question

    On January 2, 2005, to better reflect the variable use of its only machine, Holly, Inc. elects to change its method of depreciation from the straight-line method to the units-of-production method. The original cost of the machine on January 2, 2003, is $50,000, and its estimated life is ten years. Holly estimates that the machine's total life is 50,000 machine hours.

    Machine-hour usage was 8,500 during 2004 and 3,500 during 2003. Machine-hour usage for 2005 is 3,800.

    Holly's income tax rate is 30%. Holly should report the accounting change in its 2005 financial statements as a(an)

    A. Estimate change recognizing $3,800 of depreciation in 2005.

    B. Estimate change recognizing $4,000 of depreciation in 2005.

    C. Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $1,400 in its income statement.

    D. Adjustment to beginning retained earnings of $1,400.

    Correct!

    A change in depreciation method is accounted for as an estimate change. The remaining book value at the beginning of the year of change is allocated over the remaining useful life using the new method.

    Book value January 1, 2005 = $50,000 – ($50,000/10)2 = $40,000.

    Estimated remaining machine hours at January 1, 2005 = $50,000 – $8,500 – $3,500 = $38,000.

    Depreciation expense for 2005 = $3,800($40,000/$38,000) = $4,000.

    #477050
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    according to the text, units of production method of depreciation

    is: cost – salvage value / useful life in units of production

    can someone explain how you calculate that based on the problem. the explanation is not very helpful….

    #477118
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    according to the text, units of production method of depreciation

    is: cost – salvage value / useful life in units of production

    can someone explain how you calculate that based on the problem. the explanation is not very helpful….

    #477052
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I did it the same way the explanation did…The BV on jan 1, 2005 would have been $40,000 because two years of depreciation expense had been taken. They tell you that it was est. to have 50,000 machine hours, but two years had already passed so you have to take out the 8500 and 3500 hours that would have been used in 03 and 04. So. The remaning machine hours are estimated to be 38,000. So you have the $40,000/3800= 1.05 and then multiply that by the machine hours for 2005, which was 3,800, and you get $4,000 depreciation expense for 2005.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 1,757 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 75’ is closed to new replies.