FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 69

  • This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
Viewing 15 replies - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,757 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #476947
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    What is so difficult about the sims? are they comparable to the Wiley book? I find those to be long.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #477016
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    What is so difficult about the sims? are they comparable to the Wiley book? I find those to be long.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476949
    nbad311
    Member

    you guys have me all rattled about SOCF now.

    If you guys can clarify, is this correct? MCQs on this have been tripping me up since day one but I think I have finally got it down:

    if a company is MAKING LOANS or COLLECTING ON THOSE LOANS (basically, in a creditor position) = Investing activities

    if the company TAKES OUT A LOAN or MAKES REPAYMENTS ON THIS LOAN (in debtor shoes) = financing activities

    REG - 65, 70, 80!
    BEC - 35, 62, 79!
    AUD - 73, 75!
    FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.

    #477017
    nbad311
    Member

    you guys have me all rattled about SOCF now.

    If you guys can clarify, is this correct? MCQs on this have been tripping me up since day one but I think I have finally got it down:

    if a company is MAKING LOANS or COLLECTING ON THOSE LOANS (basically, in a creditor position) = Investing activities

    if the company TAKES OUT A LOAN or MAKES REPAYMENTS ON THIS LOAN (in debtor shoes) = financing activities

    REG - 65, 70, 80!
    BEC - 35, 62, 79!
    AUD - 73, 75!
    FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.

    #476951
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Making loans – investing – only the principle though, the interest is operating

    taking out loans – financing Only the principle payment though, the payment of interest is operating

    Do you net out the allowance for uncollectible property taxes against the property tax receivable? Ninja notes says you never net them, but Wiley says that they have to be netted. Thanks in advance.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #477019
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Making loans – investing – only the principle though, the interest is operating

    taking out loans – financing Only the principle payment though, the payment of interest is operating

    Do you net out the allowance for uncollectible property taxes against the property tax receivable? Ninja notes says you never net them, but Wiley says that they have to be netted. Thanks in advance.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476953
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    NYC – at a conference so please forgive the abbreviated reply:

    DR: Property taxes receivable $2,000,000

    CR: Property tax revenue $1,980,000

    CR: Allowance for uncollectible property taxes $20,000

    #477021
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    NYC – at a conference so please forgive the abbreviated reply:

    DR: Property taxes receivable $2,000,000

    CR: Property tax revenue $1,980,000

    CR: Allowance for uncollectible property taxes $20,000

    #476955
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I always thought you have to net them…as DJN showed above.

    Q:

    A company that sells computers buys inventory and pays cash of $19,000. It also buys a truck and pays $48,000. It pays $30,000 on a long-term liability and $14,000 in cash dividends. On a statement of cash flows, what should be listed as the cash outflow in connection with investing activities?

    A

    $48,000

    Why is the 30,000 included if it's from a long term liability? Isn't that meant to mean a note payable, which in that case ISN'T a cash outflow? Is that answer correct or am I misunderstanding something?

    #477023
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I always thought you have to net them…as DJN showed above.

    Q:

    A company that sells computers buys inventory and pays cash of $19,000. It also buys a truck and pays $48,000. It pays $30,000 on a long-term liability and $14,000 in cash dividends. On a statement of cash flows, what should be listed as the cash outflow in connection with investing activities?

    A

    $48,000

    Why is the 30,000 included if it's from a long term liability? Isn't that meant to mean a note payable, which in that case ISN'T a cash outflow? Is that answer correct or am I misunderstanding something?

    #476957
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    ? @ Dante lol If they paid 30,000 on a loan they owed that's a cash outflow in financing section. If someone paid them 30,000 for a loan they made that's a cash inflow in investing section. The 14,000 in dividends is financing, the 19,000 in inventory is operating, and equipment is investing.

    Thanks @ DJN.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #477025
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    ? @ Dante lol If they paid 30,000 on a loan they owed that's a cash outflow in financing section. If someone paid them 30,000 for a loan they made that's a cash inflow in investing section. The 14,000 in dividends is financing, the 19,000 in inventory is operating, and equipment is investing.

    Thanks @ DJN.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476959
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think I read it wrong…I read it as if they signed a note for the truck on that date for 30,000 and then paid the rest with the 14,000 in cash. Not that they paid 30,000 on a loan that was outstanding. Ugh. Ok so if that happened then it would have been 14,000 right?

    #477027
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think I read it wrong…I read it as if they signed a note for the truck on that date for 30,000 and then paid the rest with the 14,000 in cash. Not that they paid 30,000 on a loan that was outstanding. Ugh. Ok so if that happened then it would have been 14,000 right?

    #476961
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Yes, the note is a non cash transaction and should be reported separately. Only the 14,000 would be reported in the investing section.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,757 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 69’ is closed to new replies.