- This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 9, 2013 at 2:08 pm #180296
jeffKeymasterFAR Resources:
Free FAR Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
FAR 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
FAR Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 1, 2013 at 6:49 pm #476846
AnonymousInactive@NYC and DJN – Thanks! You guys have a solid grasp of most concepts and I am sure you will rock on your exam.
As the day approaches, the anxiety keeps on building up. It seems like no matter how well you are prepared, there is always that skeptic mind that surfaces.
October 1, 2013 at 8:26 pm #476783
NYCaccountantParticipantQuestion – Does compensation expense related to stock appreciation rights have to be equal year to year?
So I granted employee 10,000 stock appreciation rights, the market value of the stock is $20 in January year 1 and $26
at the end of year 1, and the requisite service period is 3 years.
So I would take the appreciated value at the end of year 1 * the 10,000 rights = 10,000 rights * 6 price increase= 60,000
60,000/3=20,000 which is my year 1 expense. Now at the end of year 2, the stock is trading at 30 per share, so I take my 10,000 rights * $10=100,000-Previous recognized balance of 20,000=80,000.
Now I'll plan to recognize that 80,000 over the final 2 years, so it would be 40,000 and 40,000 assuming no changes. So through the second year, I would have booked 20k in Y1 and 40k in Y2= 60k liability at the end of year 2.
I've seen it done like this but then I've seen it done where the whole thing is remeasured at year 2 and the liability for year 2 would equal 66,666 (33,333 per year). FYI – if done this way the expense for year 2 would have be 46,666.
Which is the correct way?!
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.October 1, 2013 at 8:26 pm #476849
NYCaccountantParticipantQuestion – Does compensation expense related to stock appreciation rights have to be equal year to year?
So I granted employee 10,000 stock appreciation rights, the market value of the stock is $20 in January year 1 and $26
at the end of year 1, and the requisite service period is 3 years.
So I would take the appreciated value at the end of year 1 * the 10,000 rights = 10,000 rights * 6 price increase= 60,000
60,000/3=20,000 which is my year 1 expense. Now at the end of year 2, the stock is trading at 30 per share, so I take my 10,000 rights * $10=100,000-Previous recognized balance of 20,000=80,000.
Now I'll plan to recognize that 80,000 over the final 2 years, so it would be 40,000 and 40,000 assuming no changes. So through the second year, I would have booked 20k in Y1 and 40k in Y2= 60k liability at the end of year 2.
I've seen it done like this but then I've seen it done where the whole thing is remeasured at year 2 and the liability for year 2 would equal 66,666 (33,333 per year). FYI – if done this way the expense for year 2 would have be 46,666.
Which is the correct way?!
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.October 1, 2013 at 9:19 pm #476785
AnonymousInactive@NYC- I would definitely go with the first option. Since the compensation is based on market conditions, current and future vesting period should be adjusted so that the sum of compensation expenses during the vesting period equals the new appreciation of stocks.
For me the second scenario only makes sense if during the first year, the market value of the stock were equal to its book value, which means no compensation expense for the first year. If the following year we have a tock appreciation, then it should be divided by the vesting period and the liability account in the current year should include compensation expense for year 1 and 2.
This is how I view it. I hope it makes sense.
October 1, 2013 at 9:19 pm #476851
AnonymousInactive@NYC- I would definitely go with the first option. Since the compensation is based on market conditions, current and future vesting period should be adjusted so that the sum of compensation expenses during the vesting period equals the new appreciation of stocks.
For me the second scenario only makes sense if during the first year, the market value of the stock were equal to its book value, which means no compensation expense for the first year. If the following year we have a tock appreciation, then it should be divided by the vesting period and the liability account in the current year should include compensation expense for year 1 and 2.
This is how I view it. I hope it makes sense.
October 1, 2013 at 9:39 pm #476787
NYCaccountantParticipantOctober 1, 2013 at 9:39 pm #476853
NYCaccountantParticipantOctober 2, 2013 at 12:44 am #476789
carpeCPAMemberGood luck to everyone taking FAR this window!
REG - 93 (Jul'13)
FAR - 97 (Dec '13)
AUD - 99 (May '14)
BEC - Jul '14Becker Self Study/Ninja Notes/Ninja Audio/Ninja MCQ/Wiley Test Bank/Wiley Book
October 2, 2013 at 12:44 am #476855
carpeCPAMemberGood luck to everyone taking FAR this window!
REG - 93 (Jul'13)
FAR - 97 (Dec '13)
AUD - 99 (May '14)
BEC - Jul '14Becker Self Study/Ninja Notes/Ninja Audio/Ninja MCQ/Wiley Test Bank/Wiley Book
October 2, 2013 at 12:58 pm #476791
ZSRizviMember@NYC & Elia
Thanks! I figured as much but I didn't know if they had some unique way they were treated as well. Pensions/Deferred Taxes are the bane of my accounting existence.
My exam is tomorrow and…I'm just so over studying for FAR that I want it to be OVER. I hope I did enough to scrape by with a 75. I'm scoring in the high 90s now (yay) and I haven't memorized the questions, so…that's good?
SIMS on the other hand…
Well, hopefully I won't have time to mope around tomorrow since my flight for India leaves right afterwards lol.
Quick question on partnerships:
On January 2, Smith purchased the net assets of Jones' Cleaning, a sole proprietorship, for $350,000, and commenced operations of Spiffy Cleaning, a sole proprietorship. The assets had a carrying amount of $375,000 and a market value of $360,000. In Spiffy's cash-basis financial statements for the year ended December 31, Spiffy reported revenues in excess of expenses of $60,000. Smith's drawings during the year were $20,000. In Spiffy's financial statements, what amount should be reported as Capital-Smith?
The answer is $390,000. They use the basis purchased ($350,000) but I thought that assets are valued at FV and so that would be Smith's basis? Then wouldn't the answer be $400,000?
F10 I didn't cover as thoroughly (as in 50%) so…I'm really hoping that it's not covered extensively.
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
October 2, 2013 at 12:58 pm #476857
ZSRizviMember@NYC & Elia
Thanks! I figured as much but I didn't know if they had some unique way they were treated as well. Pensions/Deferred Taxes are the bane of my accounting existence.
My exam is tomorrow and…I'm just so over studying for FAR that I want it to be OVER. I hope I did enough to scrape by with a 75. I'm scoring in the high 90s now (yay) and I haven't memorized the questions, so…that's good?
SIMS on the other hand…
Well, hopefully I won't have time to mope around tomorrow since my flight for India leaves right afterwards lol.
Quick question on partnerships:
On January 2, Smith purchased the net assets of Jones' Cleaning, a sole proprietorship, for $350,000, and commenced operations of Spiffy Cleaning, a sole proprietorship. The assets had a carrying amount of $375,000 and a market value of $360,000. In Spiffy's cash-basis financial statements for the year ended December 31, Spiffy reported revenues in excess of expenses of $60,000. Smith's drawings during the year were $20,000. In Spiffy's financial statements, what amount should be reported as Capital-Smith?
The answer is $390,000. They use the basis purchased ($350,000) but I thought that assets are valued at FV and so that would be Smith's basis? Then wouldn't the answer be $400,000?
F10 I didn't cover as thoroughly (as in 50%) so…I'm really hoping that it's not covered extensively.
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
October 2, 2013 at 1:33 pm #476793
jeffKeymaster“Although, being that Summer is over, this only means that work begins to be kicked up a few notches with interim, year-end preparation and year-end approaching (don’t you just LOVE public accounting!?!).”
October 2, 2013 at 1:33 pm #476859
jeffKeymaster“Although, being that Summer is over, this only means that work begins to be kicked up a few notches with interim, year-end preparation and year-end approaching (don’t you just LOVE public accounting!?!).”
October 2, 2013 at 3:30 pm #476795
NYCaccountantParticipant@ ZSR I got this wrong as well. I think when you buy the net assets, it's like buying regular property, so you would record them at cost You would then allocate that costs based on their relative market values. what's confusing is that for partnerships which convert to corporations, all net assets are recorded at fair value. I test saturday. I'm hoping to be finally done with this test!
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.October 2, 2013 at 3:30 pm #476861
NYCaccountantParticipant@ ZSR I got this wrong as well. I think when you buy the net assets, it's like buying regular property, so you would record them at cost You would then allocate that costs based on their relative market values. what's confusing is that for partnerships which convert to corporations, all net assets are recorded at fair value. I test saturday. I'm hoping to be finally done with this test!
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete. -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 58’ is closed to new replies.
