FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 49

  • This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
Viewing 15 replies - 721 through 735 (of 1,757 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #476646
    nbad311
    Member

    Cranky attitude alert: here's to hoping there are minimal deferred tax questions on my exam because I am probably just not going to torture myself with trying to get any of these damn questions right. Halfway through my 17-page Gleim chapter and ready to just move on to the next without expending any further effort of this garbage of a subject.

    REG - 65, 70, 80!
    BEC - 35, 62, 79!
    AUD - 73, 75!
    FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.

    #476712
    nbad311
    Member

    Cranky attitude alert: here's to hoping there are minimal deferred tax questions on my exam because I am probably just not going to torture myself with trying to get any of these damn questions right. Halfway through my 17-page Gleim chapter and ready to just move on to the next without expending any further effort of this garbage of a subject.

    REG - 65, 70, 80!
    BEC - 35, 62, 79!
    AUD - 73, 75!
    FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.

    #476648
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    nbad311 – here's my (over simplified!) chart on how to deal with DTA/DTL

    Book Inc


    Tax Inc

    More


    Less


    Liability

    Less


    More


    Asset

    So just remember: Tax/Less/Liability and the rest of the little table falls into place.

    Does that help at all?

    #476714
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    nbad311 – here's my (over simplified!) chart on how to deal with DTA/DTL

    Book Inc


    Tax Inc

    More


    Less


    Liability

    Less


    More


    Asset

    So just remember: Tax/Less/Liability and the rest of the little table falls into place.

    Does that help at all?

    #476650
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Does Becker point out the important stuff you must know? I feel like Wiley throws a bunch of information at you and expects to remember all of it. Going through the book a second time and just getting depressed looking at the scope of information.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476716
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Does Becker point out the important stuff you must know? I feel like Wiley throws a bunch of information at you and expects to remember all of it. Going through the book a second time and just getting depressed looking at the scope of information.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476652
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @NYC – I think Becker does point on the “important stuff.” In looking at both Becker and Wiley I found a lot of stuff covered in Wiley that I wasn't asked about on any of the tests I've taken so for (with one notable item) but Becker seems pretty spot-on. Of course there are exceptions to every rule, but I'm three tests in now and I've been pretty pleased with Becker so far. Also, now that the *magic outlines* have suddently appeared on the Becker site I'm a lot happier!

    #476718
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @NYC – I think Becker does point on the “important stuff.” In looking at both Becker and Wiley I found a lot of stuff covered in Wiley that I wasn't asked about on any of the tests I've taken so for (with one notable item) but Becker seems pretty spot-on. Of course there are exceptions to every rule, but I'm three tests in now and I've been pretty pleased with Becker so far. Also, now that the *magic outlines* have suddently appeared on the Becker site I'm a lot happier!

    #476654
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Thanks. I'm thinking about trying to make the switch over to Becker (saving money lol). Wiley has me burned out at this point.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476720
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Thanks. I'm thinking about trying to make the switch over to Becker (saving money lol). Wiley has me burned out at this point.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476656
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The Statement of Cash Flows if the fvcking BANE of MY EXISTENCE. ONE way isn't enough? We need TWO ways? WHY?????

    #476722
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The Statement of Cash Flows if the fvcking BANE of MY EXISTENCE. ONE way isn't enough? We need TWO ways? WHY?????

    #476658
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Lol @ DJN you'll get it. Quick question – If the bonds or preferred stock that I issued last year are actually converted at the mid point of the current year, should I calc the weighted average for 12 months, 6 months, or 0 months? I've been looking for a question which asks this, but can”t find any. I'm assuming that I would use 12 months and take away the corresponding interest expense net of tax if any. Thanks in advance for your help.

    Bonds convert into 1,000 shares and are actually converted at mid year. Should I use 500 (1,000/2) or 1,000(12/12)?

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476724
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Lol @ DJN you'll get it. Quick question – If the bonds or preferred stock that I issued last year are actually converted at the mid point of the current year, should I calc the weighted average for 12 months, 6 months, or 0 months? I've been looking for a question which asks this, but can”t find any. I'm assuming that I would use 12 months and take away the corresponding interest expense net of tax if any. Thanks in advance for your help.

    Bonds convert into 1,000 shares and are actually converted at mid year. Should I use 500 (1,000/2) or 1,000(12/12)?

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #476660
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    i don't understand this question. i understand there is 8000 period loss but the question is asking the gross profit recognized? not the loss. so shouldnt the answer be zero?

    Tag Question

    A contractor recognizes $42,000 of gross profit on a contract at the end of year one of the contract under the percentage-of-completion method. At the end of year two, the gross profit to be recognized for both years together is $34,000. The total anticipated gross profit on the project estimated at the end of year two is $78,000. What amount of gross profit is to be recognized for year two alone?

    A. $78,000

    B. $34,000

    C. $8,000

    D. $0

    Correct!

    This is an example of a single-period loss on a profitable contract. The loss for year two is computed as: $34,000 gross profit through year two – $42,000 gross profit year one = – $8,000 single-period loss. The loss “reverses” $8,000 of the $42,000 gross profit recognized in year one.

Viewing 15 replies - 721 through 735 (of 1,757 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 49’ is closed to new replies.