- This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 9, 2013 at 2:08 pm #180296
jeffKeymasterFAR Resources:
Free FAR Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
FAR 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
FAR Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
September 28, 2013 at 6:00 pm #476616
AnonymousInactive@ericnkem – oh, now I remember! Thank you! For some reason I was thinking there was both a 15 and 20 year thing in pension accounting and I had forgotten about the PRBO items. Too much info, too little space left in brain…
September 28, 2013 at 6:00 pm #476683
AnonymousInactive@ericnkem – oh, now I remember! Thank you! For some reason I was thinking there was both a 15 and 20 year thing in pension accounting and I had forgotten about the PRBO items. Too much info, too little space left in brain…
September 28, 2013 at 9:27 pm #476618
NYCaccountantParticipantDoes prior period service not get amortized to the follow year when it's granted? Prior service costs granted in June of year 1 would not get amortized at all until year 2, correct? Does the same rule apply for changes in actuary assumptions and other gains and losses?
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 28, 2013 at 9:27 pm #476685
NYCaccountantParticipantDoes prior period service not get amortized to the follow year when it's granted? Prior service costs granted in June of year 1 would not get amortized at all until year 2, correct? Does the same rule apply for changes in actuary assumptions and other gains and losses?
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 28, 2013 at 11:37 pm #476620
ZSRizviMember@NYC
Yes, prior service cost isn't amortized until the following year.
Gains and losses (both from changes in actuarial assumptions and arising due to expected and actual returns) are amortized over the excess of 10% of the greater of the PBO OR Market value over the average remaining employee service life.
@Monir
I know right? I think it's because they didn't have CPAs themselves so…might have made them look bad if I got mine and they didn't. But then again, there was office favoritism/politics going on…
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
September 28, 2013 at 11:37 pm #476687
ZSRizviMember@NYC
Yes, prior service cost isn't amortized until the following year.
Gains and losses (both from changes in actuarial assumptions and arising due to expected and actual returns) are amortized over the excess of 10% of the greater of the PBO OR Market value over the average remaining employee service life.
@Monir
I know right? I think it's because they didn't have CPAs themselves so…might have made them look bad if I got mine and they didn't. But then again, there was office favoritism/politics going on…
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
September 28, 2013 at 11:43 pm #476622
NYCaccountantParticipantThanks ZSR. I'm trying to figure out where did I see that rule. It's funny because in my head i'm like thats the rule but because I can't find it anywhere, I start to doubt myself.
One more question. Are Bond issue costs considered part of the carrying value of the bond? I thought they were recorded in a deferred account and straight lined over the life of the bond. Interest expense would then be calculated using the effective interest rate for the carrying value of the bond.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 28, 2013 at 11:43 pm #476689
NYCaccountantParticipantThanks ZSR. I'm trying to figure out where did I see that rule. It's funny because in my head i'm like thats the rule but because I can't find it anywhere, I start to doubt myself.
One more question. Are Bond issue costs considered part of the carrying value of the bond? I thought they were recorded in a deferred account and straight lined over the life of the bond. Interest expense would then be calculated using the effective interest rate for the carrying value of the bond.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 28, 2013 at 11:53 pm #476624
ZSRizviMember@NYC
No, bond issue costs aren't included in the carrying amount. They only affect net proceeds. While bond issue costs are amortized, only the amortization of discounts/premium affect the bond's carrying amount. When bond issue costs are amortized, it's basically only a reversal/decrease of the balance in the “bond issue costs” account.
I know what you mean. My exam is Thursday of this week and panic (as usual) is starting to settle in. I feel like the exam is going to go into super detail on some questions (especially disclosures) which will render me screwed.
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
September 28, 2013 at 11:53 pm #476691
ZSRizviMember@NYC
No, bond issue costs aren't included in the carrying amount. They only affect net proceeds. While bond issue costs are amortized, only the amortization of discounts/premium affect the bond's carrying amount. When bond issue costs are amortized, it's basically only a reversal/decrease of the balance in the “bond issue costs” account.
I know what you mean. My exam is Thursday of this week and panic (as usual) is starting to settle in. I feel like the exam is going to go into super detail on some questions (especially disclosures) which will render me screwed.
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
September 29, 2013 at 12:02 am #476626
AnonymousInactive@NYC – Under IFRS bond issue costs reduce the cash received from bond issuance and are deducted from the carrying value of the liability. Like you said under GAAP it amortized over the life of the bond.
September 29, 2013 at 12:02 am #476693
AnonymousInactive@NYC – Under IFRS bond issue costs reduce the cash received from bond issuance and are deducted from the carrying value of the liability. Like you said under GAAP it amortized over the life of the bond.
September 29, 2013 at 12:14 am #476628
AnonymousInactivecan anyone explain this question?
On January 1, 2005, Rex Co. sold a used machine to Lake, Inc. for $525,000. On this date, the machine had a depreciated cost of $367,500
Lake paid $75,000 cash on January 1, 2005 and signed a $450,000 note, bearing interest at 10%.
The note was payable in three annual installments of $150,000 beginning January 1, 2006. Rex appropriately accounted for the sale under the installment method. Lake made a timely payment of the first installment on January 1, 2006 of $195,000, which included interest of $45,000 to date of payment.
At December 31, 2006, Rex has deferred gross profit of
A. $105,000
B. $99,000
C. $90,000
D. $76,500
Correct!
The gross profit percentage on the machine is 30% [($525,000 – $367,500)/$525,000]. Total gross profit is $157,500 ($525,000 – $367,500). This amount is deferred until cash is collected.
Under the installment method, 30% of each cash receipt is recognized gross profit. The $150,000 installments must be principal amounts, because they sum to the face value of the note. Interest is paid in addition to the installment amounts. As of December 31, 2006, only one $150,000 installment was collected.
Total gross profit on sale
$157,500
Less gross profit recognized on cash collections:
($75,000 + $150,000).30
(67,500)
Equals deferred gross profit at 31 December 2006
$90,000
September 29, 2013 at 12:14 am #476695
AnonymousInactivecan anyone explain this question?
On January 1, 2005, Rex Co. sold a used machine to Lake, Inc. for $525,000. On this date, the machine had a depreciated cost of $367,500
Lake paid $75,000 cash on January 1, 2005 and signed a $450,000 note, bearing interest at 10%.
The note was payable in three annual installments of $150,000 beginning January 1, 2006. Rex appropriately accounted for the sale under the installment method. Lake made a timely payment of the first installment on January 1, 2006 of $195,000, which included interest of $45,000 to date of payment.
At December 31, 2006, Rex has deferred gross profit of
A. $105,000
B. $99,000
C. $90,000
D. $76,500
Correct!
The gross profit percentage on the machine is 30% [($525,000 – $367,500)/$525,000]. Total gross profit is $157,500 ($525,000 – $367,500). This amount is deferred until cash is collected.
Under the installment method, 30% of each cash receipt is recognized gross profit. The $150,000 installments must be principal amounts, because they sum to the face value of the note. Interest is paid in addition to the installment amounts. As of December 31, 2006, only one $150,000 installment was collected.
Total gross profit on sale
$157,500
Less gross profit recognized on cash collections:
($75,000 + $150,000).30
(67,500)
Equals deferred gross profit at 31 December 2006
$90,000
September 29, 2013 at 12:15 am #476630
AnonymousInactivei dont understand why the interest was not included as part of the cash collections….
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 47’ is closed to new replies.
