- This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 9, 2013 at 2:08 pm #180296
jeffKeymasterFAR Resources:
Free FAR Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
FAR 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
FAR Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
September 19, 2013 at 6:18 pm #476458
AnonymousInactiveSeptember 19, 2013 at 6:34 pm #476391
MonirMemberCan anyone explain to me , a bond issue a discount when market interest rate higher than bond interest rate or vice versa for premium. How does it really attractive it to investor ? for example, If a bond issued at a premium why would someone buy that?
September 19, 2013 at 6:34 pm #476460
MonirMemberCan anyone explain to me , a bond issue a discount when market interest rate higher than bond interest rate or vice versa for premium. How does it really attractive it to investor ? for example, If a bond issued at a premium why would someone buy that?
September 19, 2013 at 6:46 pm #476393
AnonymousInactive@Monir – bonds issued at a premium provide an investor with an interest rate greater than the general market interest rate, so the investor is willing to pay more for the bond because he will get a larger return.
Market interest rates – 8%
Premium bond interest rate – 10%
Premium bond price $101 (so paying up $1)
The investor is willing to pay more than par for the bond because the rate he'll earn is higher.
Conversely, bonds issued at a discount give an investor less than the market rate of interest so he will only be willing to pay less (than par).
Let me know if that doesn't make sense and I'll try to explain it a different way.
September 19, 2013 at 6:46 pm #476462
AnonymousInactive@Monir – bonds issued at a premium provide an investor with an interest rate greater than the general market interest rate, so the investor is willing to pay more for the bond because he will get a larger return.
Market interest rates – 8%
Premium bond interest rate – 10%
Premium bond price $101 (so paying up $1)
The investor is willing to pay more than par for the bond because the rate he'll earn is higher.
Conversely, bonds issued at a discount give an investor less than the market rate of interest so he will only be willing to pay less (than par).
Let me know if that doesn't make sense and I'll try to explain it a different way.
September 19, 2013 at 6:47 pm #476395
NYCaccountantParticipant@ Monir Basically the market rate on bonds is 8%, but the stated rate of interest on the bonds I'm trying to sell is only 7%.
Why would an investor buy a bond from me at a lower interest rate when they can get the same bond in the market at a higher interest rate. So what do I do? I discount my bond, which means that instead of the investor paying for the face value of the bond, they are only going to have to pay for most of the face value. Example below
Say the face value is 200,000, but i discount it and allow the investor to pay me 198,000.
Entry
Cash Dr. 198,000
Bonds Payable Cr. 200,000
Discount Dr. 2,000
Basically I gave the investor a 2,000 discount upfront and when the bond matures, I'll pay them 200,000 instead of 198,000 back. This makes it more attractive and the investor may be willing to buy my bond now.
For a premium, the market rate is less than the stated rate on my bond. So an investor wants to by my bond because my bonds have a higher interest than he would get otherwise. So what does that mean? My bonds are worth more than the market can offer right now. So I make the investor pay a premium to me because my bonds are actually worth more.
Example below:
Cash Dr.202,000
Bonds Payable Cr. 200,000
Premium Cr. 2,000
Edit- Sorry @ DJN. I would not have posted if I saw you respond already. Don't mean to cut in line lol.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 19, 2013 at 6:47 pm #476464
NYCaccountantParticipant@ Monir Basically the market rate on bonds is 8%, but the stated rate of interest on the bonds I'm trying to sell is only 7%.
Why would an investor buy a bond from me at a lower interest rate when they can get the same bond in the market at a higher interest rate. So what do I do? I discount my bond, which means that instead of the investor paying for the face value of the bond, they are only going to have to pay for most of the face value. Example below
Say the face value is 200,000, but i discount it and allow the investor to pay me 198,000.
Entry
Cash Dr. 198,000
Bonds Payable Cr. 200,000
Discount Dr. 2,000
Basically I gave the investor a 2,000 discount upfront and when the bond matures, I'll pay them 200,000 instead of 198,000 back. This makes it more attractive and the investor may be willing to buy my bond now.
For a premium, the market rate is less than the stated rate on my bond. So an investor wants to by my bond because my bonds have a higher interest than he would get otherwise. So what does that mean? My bonds are worth more than the market can offer right now. So I make the investor pay a premium to me because my bonds are actually worth more.
Example below:
Cash Dr.202,000
Bonds Payable Cr. 200,000
Premium Cr. 2,000
Edit- Sorry @ DJN. I would not have posted if I saw you respond already. Don't mean to cut in line lol.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 19, 2013 at 6:52 pm #476397
AnonymousInactive@NYCaccountant – your explanation is so much more thorough that mine — feel free to jump in any time. (There should be a forum rule that if I try to explain something and you explain it, just delete mine and post yours… !)
ETA: As you can generally tell by my posts, I am better with the high level conceptual items than the down and dirty things that require calculations.
September 19, 2013 at 6:52 pm #476466
AnonymousInactive@NYCaccountant – your explanation is so much more thorough that mine — feel free to jump in any time. (There should be a forum rule that if I try to explain something and you explain it, just delete mine and post yours… !)
ETA: As you can generally tell by my posts, I am better with the high level conceptual items than the down and dirty things that require calculations.
September 19, 2013 at 7:14 pm #476399
MonirMemberThank you both, make sense !! I just could not figure it out of course after explanation it def make sense.
Thx
September 19, 2013 at 7:14 pm #476468
MonirMemberThank you both, make sense !! I just could not figure it out of course after explanation it def make sense.
Thx
September 19, 2013 at 7:16 pm #476401
mjp44MemberRetroactive application for accounting changes is required for changes in accounting principle, business entity and correction of error. Are there any other instances when retroactive application is required?
Additionally, with this application, the opening balances of retained earnings for the current year are adjusted to reflect this change. Does the company have to go back to each of the prior year's statments and adjust the specific accounts for this change? OR is the cumulative affect of the change reflected in the current financial statements? My thinking is if for example, inventory needed to be adjusted by a $100K increase… On the current financial statements, inventory (asset) would be increased by the $100K resulting in an increase to retained earnings for the same amount. This would result in a corrected inventory and retained earnings balance.
FAR- PASSED (11/13)
REG- PASSED (2/14)
BEC- PASSED (5/14)
AUD- PASSED (8/14)If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.
September 19, 2013 at 7:16 pm #476470
mjp44MemberRetroactive application for accounting changes is required for changes in accounting principle, business entity and correction of error. Are there any other instances when retroactive application is required?
Additionally, with this application, the opening balances of retained earnings for the current year are adjusted to reflect this change. Does the company have to go back to each of the prior year's statments and adjust the specific accounts for this change? OR is the cumulative affect of the change reflected in the current financial statements? My thinking is if for example, inventory needed to be adjusted by a $100K increase… On the current financial statements, inventory (asset) would be increased by the $100K resulting in an increase to retained earnings for the same amount. This would result in a corrected inventory and retained earnings balance.
FAR- PASSED (11/13)
REG- PASSED (2/14)
BEC- PASSED (5/14)
AUD- PASSED (8/14)If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.
September 19, 2013 at 7:45 pm #476403
NYCaccountantParticipantmjp44 corrections of errors require a restroactive statement, they do not receive retroactive application. If you think about it, the error probably would have occured in the preceeding period, so you must restate the financial statements for the preceeding period. For an error, you don't need to go back in time to the earliest point feasible to correct because they generally only affect one period. For retrospective application, the company will adjust the beginning retained earnings for the current period. Usually companies present current and previous year financials together, so the beginning retained earnings will be adjusted for the current financials, the ending retained earnings will be adjusted for the previous year, and the cumulative effect of the change prior to the previous year will be reflected as adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the previous years balance sheet.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 19, 2013 at 7:45 pm #476472
NYCaccountantParticipantmjp44 corrections of errors require a restroactive statement, they do not receive retroactive application. If you think about it, the error probably would have occured in the preceeding period, so you must restate the financial statements for the preceeding period. For an error, you don't need to go back in time to the earliest point feasible to correct because they generally only affect one period. For retrospective application, the company will adjust the beginning retained earnings for the current period. Usually companies present current and previous year financials together, so the beginning retained earnings will be adjusted for the current financials, the ending retained earnings will be adjusted for the previous year, and the cumulative effect of the change prior to the previous year will be reflected as adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the previous years balance sheet.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete. -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 32’ is closed to new replies.
