- This topic has 1,757 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
FAR Study Group MCQ’s.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 9, 2013 at 2:08 pm #180296
jeffKeymasterFAR Resources:
Free FAR Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
FAR 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
FAR Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
September 17, 2013 at 8:05 pm #476338
NYCaccountantParticipant@ ZSR I have absolutely no idea what to expect when it comes to the sims on the exam. The sims in the test bank are so easy it's a joke. I do the sims within Wiley's book, which i”ve heard are somewhat comparable to the actual thing. I honestly just plan on having a good grasp of all concepts and then work off of that during the actual exam sims.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 17, 2013 at 8:24 pm #476271
MonirMember@ ZSR and NYC, based on my experince , each sim will be different. Some SIM's will be reletivley easy ( if you know the stuff you should be fine & if you have enough time, you should try to search every SIM. I think at least 2 or 3 sim you would find in AL). At least 2 sims would be difficult and wordy, somewhat vague. Again if you know ur stuff you will be able to figure out. some sims you r gonna have to fill few boxes only ( My assumpation could be wrong) .
Thx
September 17, 2013 at 8:24 pm #476340
MonirMember@ ZSR and NYC, based on my experince , each sim will be different. Some SIM's will be reletivley easy ( if you know the stuff you should be fine & if you have enough time, you should try to search every SIM. I think at least 2 or 3 sim you would find in AL). At least 2 sims would be difficult and wordy, somewhat vague. Again if you know ur stuff you will be able to figure out. some sims you r gonna have to fill few boxes only ( My assumpation could be wrong) .
Thx
September 17, 2013 at 8:31 pm #476273
MonirMember@ ZSR and NYC, How did you guys do on F5 ( assuming you guys using Becker ). I am struggling with detachable bonds + Convertible bonds. I wonder I would I be able remember all the stuff.
September 17, 2013 at 8:31 pm #476342
MonirMember@ ZSR and NYC, How did you guys do on F5 ( assuming you guys using Becker ). I am struggling with detachable bonds + Convertible bonds. I wonder I would I be able remember all the stuff.
September 17, 2013 at 8:44 pm #476275
AnonymousInactiveZSRizvi – there will be 7 sims TOTAL on the real exam, not 42. One (or possibly 2) of those will be research questions.
September 17, 2013 at 8:44 pm #476344
AnonymousInactiveZSRizvi – there will be 7 sims TOTAL on the real exam, not 42. One (or possibly 2) of those will be research questions.
September 17, 2013 at 8:54 pm #476277
ZSRizviMember@DJN
Thanks for the clarification. Becker made me panic for a bit there. I was thinking, “How in the world are we suppose to finish 7 sims that have multiple sections to each in the allotted time?”
@Monir
F5 was actually one of the sections I did better on. Problem with me is, I understand most of the concepts in the chapters covered…I just have the memory of a goldfish. So it kind of cancels each other out LOL.
So far, my most comfortable sections have been F5 (Leases and Bonds), F7 (Stockholders' Equity), F4(Working Capital and Fixed Assets).
I'm dying with F6 though. Not so much with pensions as with deferred tax assets and liabilities. I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THEM. It's so frustrating. I don't get the reversals and the terminology is confusing.
@NYC
Thanks for the heads-up about the Wiley SIMS. Most say they're closer to the real thing than Becker.
And as I start the review process, I'll definitely be needing your help on a lot of the areas I'm weak on.
So…uh…please don't disappear on us. LOL.
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
September 17, 2013 at 8:54 pm #476346
ZSRizviMember@DJN
Thanks for the clarification. Becker made me panic for a bit there. I was thinking, “How in the world are we suppose to finish 7 sims that have multiple sections to each in the allotted time?”
@Monir
F5 was actually one of the sections I did better on. Problem with me is, I understand most of the concepts in the chapters covered…I just have the memory of a goldfish. So it kind of cancels each other out LOL.
So far, my most comfortable sections have been F5 (Leases and Bonds), F7 (Stockholders' Equity), F4(Working Capital and Fixed Assets).
I'm dying with F6 though. Not so much with pensions as with deferred tax assets and liabilities. I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THEM. It's so frustrating. I don't get the reversals and the terminology is confusing.
@NYC
Thanks for the heads-up about the Wiley SIMS. Most say they're closer to the real thing than Becker.
And as I start the review process, I'll definitely be needing your help on a lot of the areas I'm weak on.
So…uh…please don't disappear on us. LOL.
BEC (July 2013)
FAR (OCT 2013)
REG (NOV 2013)
AUD (JAN 2014)The CPA Exam is an opponent that not even the Fellowship of the Ring would want to come across.
I have a long...long...journey ahead of me.
September 17, 2013 at 9:03 pm #476279
NYCaccountantParticipant@Monir GAAP gives no recognition to the equity portion of a convertible bond, while IFRS does. The discount or premium on a convertible bond under IFRS is the equity portion of the security. Just think of it this way, I want to sell you a bond for 1,000,000. The bond is only worth 950,000 today, so I add a convertible feature to make it more attractive. So because we know the present value of the bond by itself is 950,000, the convertible feature must make up the difference. Journal entry below on issuance of bond:
Cash Dr. 1,000,000
Bonds Payable Cr. 1,000,000
Discount on bonds Dr. 50,000
Additional paid in capital Cr. 50,000
Does detachable bonds, these are different in that they can be separated. You have to use the relative market value method for this. Just like we learned in the inventory section. There was a similar way to determine costs of inventory when you buy items together with no individual price for each item. Anyway, we need the market value of the bond and the warrant or just one. so we issue bonds with detachable warrants for 1,000,000. The market value of the warrant is 50,000 and the market value of the bond is 950,000. 950,000+50,000=1,000,000 . The bond (950,000/1,000,000) is 95% of the combined market value, while the warrant makes up the 5% difference. Just multiply the percentages * the issuance price. In this case, it's very simple and no math needs to be done. 1,000,000*95%=950,000 1,000,000*5%=50,000
Entry below:
Cash – Dr. 1,000,000
Bond Payable Cr. 1,000,000
Discount on bonds Dr. 50,000
Additional paid in capital Cr. 50,000
Made some changes to the entry, either way it's the same result.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 17, 2013 at 9:03 pm #476348
NYCaccountantParticipant@Monir GAAP gives no recognition to the equity portion of a convertible bond, while IFRS does. The discount or premium on a convertible bond under IFRS is the equity portion of the security. Just think of it this way, I want to sell you a bond for 1,000,000. The bond is only worth 950,000 today, so I add a convertible feature to make it more attractive. So because we know the present value of the bond by itself is 950,000, the convertible feature must make up the difference. Journal entry below on issuance of bond:
Cash Dr. 1,000,000
Bonds Payable Cr. 1,000,000
Discount on bonds Dr. 50,000
Additional paid in capital Cr. 50,000
Does detachable bonds, these are different in that they can be separated. You have to use the relative market value method for this. Just like we learned in the inventory section. There was a similar way to determine costs of inventory when you buy items together with no individual price for each item. Anyway, we need the market value of the bond and the warrant or just one. so we issue bonds with detachable warrants for 1,000,000. The market value of the warrant is 50,000 and the market value of the bond is 950,000. 950,000+50,000=1,000,000 . The bond (950,000/1,000,000) is 95% of the combined market value, while the warrant makes up the 5% difference. Just multiply the percentages * the issuance price. In this case, it's very simple and no math needs to be done. 1,000,000*95%=950,000 1,000,000*5%=50,000
Entry below:
Cash – Dr. 1,000,000
Bond Payable Cr. 1,000,000
Discount on bonds Dr. 50,000
Additional paid in capital Cr. 50,000
Made some changes to the entry, either way it's the same result.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 17, 2013 at 9:17 pm #476281
IbParticipantSeptember 17, 2013 at 9:17 pm #476350
IbParticipantSeptember 17, 2013 at 9:17 pm #476283
NYCaccountantParticipantZSR I can help you deferred taxes. I actually like that stuff. what are you having problems with? I like this forum, very helpful.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.September 17, 2013 at 9:17 pm #476352
NYCaccountantParticipantZSR I can help you deferred taxes. I actually like that stuff. what are you having problems with? I like this forum, very helpful.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete. -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2013 - Page 24’ is closed to new replies.
