[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 108

Viewing 15 replies - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 2,797 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #599087
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Thanks Lanne, I was beginning to panic.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #599088
    lannebrown
    Participant

    @ahugemistake I would suggest continuing to practice the way you are forced to with Wiley though because it will at least help you become comfortable with the standards. This will come in handy on the exam when you want to be 100% sure on those research questions. Use the key word search on exam day, but having the Wiley glitch experience you will be more confident.

    AUD - 72,85 expires 12/31/15 yikes
    FAR - 72,68,76!!!!
    REG - 72, NOV 2015
    BEC - 67,66,10/24/2015

    #599089
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    jstay

    I suppose something like that. Or may be like this:

    DR Rent expense 30000

    CR Rent payable 30000

    DR Rent payable 25000

    CR Cash 25000

    #599090
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    On January 1, Year 1, David Corp. issued 1000 of its $1,000 bonds at 94. David Corp. uses U.S. GAAP. The bonds mature in 10 years but are callable at 102 any time after issuance. On January 1, Year 1, David incurred bond issue costs of $50,000. On July 1, Year 8, David called all of the bonds and retired them. Assuming that bond discount and issue costs were amortized using the straight-line method, what amount of pretax loss would David report from this extinguishment of debt?

    Bond face $ 1,000,000

    Issued @ 94 $ 940,000

    Issue cost 50,000

    Net carrying value (890,000)

    Amortization per year

    11,000

    Jan Year 1 – July Year 8 × 7.5

    Total amortization 82,500

    Original net carrying value 890,000

    Current net carrying value 972,500

    Call price @ 102 (1,020,000)

    ANSWER:

    Loss on call of bonds $ (47,500)

    Im getting this: Settlement price (1,020,000) – (carrying amount 940,000- unamortized disc 15000- remaining bond issue costs 12500) = 107,500.

    Why do they subtract bond issue cost from the issue price? I thought it's amortized over the life of the bond, and therefore it shouldn't be subtracted to get net carrying amount.

    #599092
    jpowell31
    Participant

    i've been trying to avoid the forum since it usually results in me wasting time or panicking at questions i have either yet to come across/see the difficult in with this much time left….. but i had to come on to just point out….that…. i hate F5. with a passion. i've been so unproductive today with this one chapter to focus on, actively avoiding it from sinking into my brain. anyone else particularly hate this chapter (bonds/LT payable and leases for any non-becker users). it's not even extremely difficult i just don't care for it AT ALL.

    one more week at work to go and it's full time studying for 1.5 weeks for me. i want to be done with this “journey” already!!

    #599093
    jpowell31
    Participant

    okay, so i'm noticing the irony in me posting in the middle of a study session on bonds … as you were 🙂

    #599094
    jpowell31
    Participant

    @cpastudent – i think it's because the broker normally pays the issue costs so the issuing company receives proceeds net of issue costs.

    #599095
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Jpowell, I'm certain that bonds are the scourge of many of us here. Stick with it.

    DM

    #599096
    D C
    Member

    Question regarding calculation of Weighted Avg. C/S Outstanding (WACSO), specifically about Treasury Stock (T/S).

    Why are T/S purchases and reissues not weighted like the common stock?

    B - 80
    A - 71, 67, 77
    R - 71, 77
    F - 72, 77
    DONE!!
    Becker Self-study all the way! Did use Ninja Notes & Audio for FAR.

    #599097
    IWPGirl
    Member

    @D C: Treasury stock affects common shares outstanding. Purchase of T/S reduces C/S and reissue increases C/S outstanding. Then common shares outstanding are weighted to calculate WACSO.

    AUD - 90
    REG - 78
    BEC - 84
    FAR - 91 woo hoooo!!

    Becker and Ninja MCQ

    #599098
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Not sure if I should reschedule for Aug 30 or try on Aug 9th and then take again in October if I fail. Still getting low 70s on ninja mcq

    #599099
    jstay
    Participant

    ok so i posted this in the far exam experience section but would like as much opinions as possible

    Just scheduled my exam for 31st of august.

    I started studying mid May because this is my first exam, i haven't taken all the classes required/recommended (advanced) for FAR but I have been putting in effort, and I know there was no way I was going to just do it in 6 weeks and take the test. So regardless, i have been doing mcq on my weekends, and practicing. I would say i'm about 75-80% done with becker and I jsut started WTB this weekend. However, i'm still getting in the 70s and in some sections even 60s. I'm just trying to learn everything, but I feel like I'm never going to be ready. (also, im interning and should be able to take the 3 weeks off before the exam)

    Any advice? Any suggestions? I'll just keep at the MCQ but I feel like this was all for a waste and that I should have waited till next summer (i'm entering into my senior year of undergrad, had 120 credits required for my state to sit, so i figured i would try it this summer and hopefully get ahead of the game, but i feel like im never going to pass).

    #599100
    D C
    Member

    @IWPGirl Thanks.. I'll just remember to fully reduce or add in the T/S.

    @jstay I would go for it. If your 75% done with Becker. Finish the the book and all its MCQs/SIMs within the next couple of weeks. Utilize your last two week before the exam for an aggressive review and go for it. You can do it if you put in the time.

    The other item to consider is that if you pass your 18 month window will start so you need to think about the next exams and consider your workload and time dedicated to the last year of undergrad as well. If you think you can manage, do it. FAR is the hardest one, good to start there..

    B - 80
    A - 71, 67, 77
    R - 71, 77
    F - 72, 77
    DONE!!
    Becker Self-study all the way! Did use Ninja Notes & Audio for FAR.

    #599101
    jstay
    Participant

    @D C, Thanks. and yeah i have considered my workload for next semester, only taking 12 credits, then im done in december. so if i do, by some miracle, pass this exam then ill just go straight in for BEC next window.

    in the 2 week review, just do all the MCQ that i already did

    #599102
    D C
    Member

    I would do a ton of MCQs using the progress tests. Do ones that include all sections and then they till you which areas you are weaker in. Go back touch up on those areas. I would also recommend learning the JEs for ALL sections. This will help for the SIMs a lot as well.

    good luck

    B - 80
    A - 71, 67, 77
    R - 71, 77
    F - 72, 77
    DONE!!
    Becker Self-study all the way! Did use Ninja Notes & Audio for FAR.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 2,797 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 108’ is closed to new replies.