- This topic has 1,364 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by
kels417.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 1, 2013 at 5:58 am #176441
tmturner74MemberIs it ok to start a FAR Study Group? I retook Audit yesterday and although I don’t have a gut feeling either way if I passed or not, I am going to start on FAR. I am using Becker self-study and purchased the Ninja Notes for FAR.
I am looking forward to reading a/b everyone’s progression. Good Luck!
Aud- 11/28/12 (72), 02/27/13 (72), 04/06/2013 77!!
FAR-tbd
BEC-tbd
REG-tbd
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 22, 2013 at 11:13 pm #417025
Tina82MemberCash flows are kicking my $$$!!! Tips anyone?
R - 74;88
A - 84
B - 74;89
F - no study = 67; May 15 = 87 & doneMarch 22, 2013 at 11:13 pm #417244
Tina82MemberCash flows are kicking my $$$!!! Tips anyone?
R - 74;88
A - 84
B - 74;89
F - no study = 67; May 15 = 87 & doneMarch 23, 2013 at 12:32 am #417027
nashville79Member@Theo and @lb18
That helps, thanks. I think I'm good to go on WACC now. The only major additional piece I picked up from the youtube vid was:
If a portion of WACC is financed through “other borrowings”, calculate weighted average interest rate (total interest/total principal of total “other borrowings) and apply to that portion of WACC.
I'm beginning to realize that, for ANY software you use, a big (too big) chunk of time is spent breaking this stuff down into learnable material. I took AUD and BEC, obviously totally different and much easier exams in my opinion, but I worked with two other folks and we were each responsible for “translating” the material for different sections. It really worked. The time in the weeds was virtually eliminated. Unfortunately, I'm going at FAR solo due to work schedule and timeline. If anyone out there has the opportunity to go that route, do it! Let go of that tight grip of control that you so naturally have as an accountant/stressed out test taker and join forces. And, there's no higher learning than teaching as you know. That's when you truly “get it”. Okay, done with the soapbox.
Now moving on to actually being productive, could Theo, lb18 or anyone else out there be a pal and explain Computer SW development costs and when they are capitalized versus expensed? Some costs seem to fall in both expense and capitalize and wtf is “product masters”?
March 23, 2013 at 12:32 am #417246
nashville79Member@Theo and @lb18
That helps, thanks. I think I'm good to go on WACC now. The only major additional piece I picked up from the youtube vid was:
If a portion of WACC is financed through “other borrowings”, calculate weighted average interest rate (total interest/total principal of total “other borrowings) and apply to that portion of WACC.
I'm beginning to realize that, for ANY software you use, a big (too big) chunk of time is spent breaking this stuff down into learnable material. I took AUD and BEC, obviously totally different and much easier exams in my opinion, but I worked with two other folks and we were each responsible for “translating” the material for different sections. It really worked. The time in the weeds was virtually eliminated. Unfortunately, I'm going at FAR solo due to work schedule and timeline. If anyone out there has the opportunity to go that route, do it! Let go of that tight grip of control that you so naturally have as an accountant/stressed out test taker and join forces. And, there's no higher learning than teaching as you know. That's when you truly “get it”. Okay, done with the soapbox.
Now moving on to actually being productive, could Theo, lb18 or anyone else out there be a pal and explain Computer SW development costs and when they are capitalized versus expensed? Some costs seem to fall in both expense and capitalize and wtf is “product masters”?
March 23, 2013 at 12:46 am #417029
nashville79Member@Tina82 “Cash Flows” is a pretty large topic to address through a forum. Is there a specific part that is kicking your tail – understanding outflows/inflows possibly?
Here's one thing I came across that helped. Not sure which SW you are using, but Becker seems to try to teach too many of the CF concepts for both Indirect and Direct simultaneously. Take out two sheets of paper (or bring up two excel/word docs) and write/type everything applicable for Direct and then do the same for Indirect. Consider them two different animals for learning purposes, yes they are similar in some ways, but so are men and women (i.e. totally different at the end of the day) A MC or SIM isn't going to ask you a question on both so don't study them in that manner.
March 23, 2013 at 12:46 am #417248
nashville79Member@Tina82 “Cash Flows” is a pretty large topic to address through a forum. Is there a specific part that is kicking your tail – understanding outflows/inflows possibly?
Here's one thing I came across that helped. Not sure which SW you are using, but Becker seems to try to teach too many of the CF concepts for both Indirect and Direct simultaneously. Take out two sheets of paper (or bring up two excel/word docs) and write/type everything applicable for Direct and then do the same for Indirect. Consider them two different animals for learning purposes, yes they are similar in some ways, but so are men and women (i.e. totally different at the end of the day) A MC or SIM isn't going to ask you a question on both so don't study them in that manner.
March 23, 2013 at 8:04 pm #417031
se7en.14ParticipantMarch 23, 2013 at 8:04 pm #417250
se7en.14ParticipantMarch 24, 2013 at 12:16 am #417033
AnonymousInactiveSe7en…it just means that if you sell an acct rec to someone with recourse and they cannot collect on it they can come after you (the seller) for the money. Normally when an acct receivable is sold with recourse we set up a “holdback” acct which has a normal balance of debit. Don't worry about this too much. It is my understanding that the test will probably only cover without recourse.
March 24, 2013 at 12:16 am #417252
AnonymousInactiveSe7en…it just means that if you sell an acct rec to someone with recourse and they cannot collect on it they can come after you (the seller) for the money. Normally when an acct receivable is sold with recourse we set up a “holdback” acct which has a normal balance of debit. Don't worry about this too much. It is my understanding that the test will probably only cover without recourse.
March 25, 2013 at 9:44 am #417035
QladMemberMarch 25, 2013 at 9:44 am #417254
QladMemberMarch 25, 2013 at 12:30 pm #417037
Tina82Member@nashville, I'm trying to use the dr/cr shortcut for changes in assets/liabilities for the indirect method they mentioned in the book but I keep getting confused. Think I have to go through the chapter again and see if I get it.
R - 74;88
A - 84
B - 74;89
F - no study = 67; May 15 = 87 & doneMarch 25, 2013 at 12:30 pm #417256
Tina82Member@nashville, I'm trying to use the dr/cr shortcut for changes in assets/liabilities for the indirect method they mentioned in the book but I keep getting confused. Think I have to go through the chapter again and see if I get it.
R - 74;88
A - 84
B - 74;89
F - no study = 67; May 15 = 87 & doneMarch 25, 2013 at 6:17 pm #417038
AnonymousInactivecan some body help me with foreign currency accounting
when we do re-measurement or translate
for Income statement we use weighted average for both
but for balance sheet for item we may use historical rate in re-measurement and current rate for translation
can some one explain to me where is the differences between them in BS
and what is the logic to use weighted average for inventory in one of them and the other we use current rate ?
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 22’ is closed to new replies.
