- This topic has 6,668 replies, 191 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
Kenada.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:58 pm #183478
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 22, 2014 at 6:14 pm #561744
AnonymousInactive@KRina–Treasury Stock Using Par Value method JE/Calcs:
Buy Back
DR Treasury Stock (shares * PAR)
DRAPIC-C.S. (share * Difference between Original selling price and PAR)
CR Cash (Shares * repurchase price)
CR APIC-TS (Shares * Difference between Original selling price and repurchase price)
If you can remember just 3 of them then you can plug the other one.
Reissue JEs depend on whether or not they are reissued above or below cost, but basically the JE is the same except that you have to plug in APIC-TS to balance for above cost. For below cost you debit APIC-TS only to the point that you credited APIC-TS in the buy back. After that you have to debit RE for the difference.
March 22, 2014 at 6:21 pm #561745
How many letters do you needParticipantKRINA – For treasury stock at purchase (meaning repurchase common stock) APIC is not included using the cost method because treasury stock is just recorded at cost. (D-Tstock C-cash). Using the par method it's D-Tstock at par value, C-cash for cash paid and APIC is just the plug – difference between the two. This works exactly the same way as a stock sale…just opposite. The only tricky thing is that if APIC is debited and the debit is greater than the existing balance, Retained Earnings is debited for the overflow. Don't know why but that just feels like an exam question…
For Treasury Stock at reissue the par method works exactly like any other issue, just crediting Tstock instead of Cstock. (D-Cash, C-Tstock@par, C-APIC).
The Cost methodat reissue:
Above purchase price: D-Cash, C-Tstock@purchase price, C-Tstock PIC for difference
Below original purchase price: D-Cash, C-Tstock @purchase price D – PIC Tstock (plug) to extent of balance (overflow to RE)
Its not too bad when you lay it out (helped me last night) Hope it makes sense!
MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?
March 22, 2014 at 6:33 pm #561746
KRinaMember@ How Many and cpamommy, your explanations helps a lot. That is the general which I now understand. Here is an example from Wiley, I was not able to up come with the right answer and wiley's explanation is not helpful. So if any of you can help me here, It will be greatly appreciated.
Asp Co. was organized on January 2, year 1, with 30,000 authorized shares of $10 par common stock. During year 1 the corporation had the following capital transactions:
January 5—Issued 20,000 shares at $15 per share.
July 14—Purchased 5,000 shares at $17 per share.
December 27—Reissued the 5,000 shares held in treasury at $20 per share.
Asp used the par value method to record the purchase and reissuance of the treasury shares. In its December 31, year 1 balance sheet, what amount should Asp report as additional paid-in capital in excess of par?
$100,000
$125,000
$140,000
$150,000
March 22, 2014 at 6:51 pm #561747
AnonymousInactive@KRina–I don't get it either. What is the answer? I calculated a credit to APIC-CS of $100,000 for the issuance, a debit of $45,000 to APIC-CS and a credit to APIC-TS for the buy back, and a credit to APIC-TS for the reissue.
March 22, 2014 at 6:58 pm #561748
How many letters do you needParticipantI'm lost on this one too!
I have balance of $115K (100-35+50), maybe this is a classic WTB typo?
MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?
March 22, 2014 at 7:02 pm #561749
teeteenounoucheMemberGlad I'm not going crazy over here, I got $115K also. What's the explanation say KRina?
Florida:
AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree
March 22, 2014 at 7:11 pm #561750
AnonymousInactiveWell it's either a typo or all of us are lost. $115K is unanimous. Where are our FAR experts???
March 22, 2014 at 7:33 pm #561751
NYCaccountantParticipantIs it $125,000?
I dom't remember exactly how to do it, but I'm giving it a shot.
Initial entry
Cash Dr. 300,000
Common Stock Cr – 200,000
APIC Cr -100,000
Second entry
Common stock Dr. 50,000
APIC Dr. – 25,000
Retain Earnings Dr -10,000
Cash Cr. 85,000
Third entry
Cash Dr.100,000
Common Stock Cr.50,000
APIC Cr. 50,000
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.March 22, 2014 at 7:36 pm #561752
KRinaMemberper Wiley, the answer is 125000. I don't understand explanation. See below. can some one who understands help?
This answer is correct. The solutions approach is to analyze each transaction to determine its effect on additional paid-in-capital.
1/5/Y1 $100,000
7/14/Y1 (25,000)
12/27/Y1 50,000
12/31/Y1 APIC $125,000
On 1/5/Y1, 20,000 shares are issued at an amount $5 above par ($15 – $10), resulting in a credit to additional paid-in capital in excess of par of $100,000 (20,000 × $5). On 7/14/Y1, 5,000 treasury shares are purchased at $17 per share. Using the par value method, treasury stock is debited for par value (5,000 × $10 = $50,000) and any excess over par from the original issuance (5,000 × $5 = $25,000) is taken off the books. Any difference between the original issue price ($50,000 + $25,000 = $75,000) and the cash paid to reacquire shares (5,000 × $17 = $85,000) is debited to retained earnings.
Treasury stock 50,000
APIC in excess of par 25,000
Retained earnings 10,000
Cash
85,000
On 12/27/Y1, the 5,000 shares are reissued at an amount $10 above par ($20 – $10), resulting in a credit to additional paid-in capital in excess of par of $50,000 (5,000 × $10).
March 22, 2014 at 7:39 pm #561753
NYCaccountantParticipantOk, so I was right. Look at the journal entries I posted. Where everyone got it wrong was when you buy back in excess of the original issue price, that difference goes to retained earnings. So instead of the second entry having 35k, it's actually supposed to be 25k.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.March 22, 2014 at 7:45 pm #561754
KRinaMember@NYCaccountant, can you please break it down the simplest way possible how to calculate APIC using the par value method for treasury stock using the above question? I get the basic but going into the detail confuses me a little…. Thanks, maybe I need a break before looking at it again
March 22, 2014 at 7:47 pm #561755
teeteenounoucheMemberWhere does it say in the question: original issuance (5,000 × $5 = $25,000)? How is the $5 calculated?
Florida:
AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree
March 22, 2014 at 7:49 pm #561756
AnonymousInactiveI hate Shareholder's Equity! Just adding it to my $hit list…. The list is getting long.
March 22, 2014 at 7:51 pm #561757
KRinaMember@ Tee, I can't help here… not only you @ cpamommy. I can't stand Treasury stock due to the par value method and diluted earnings per share but I think I am getting the diluted eps. Hopefully by the time I take exam, I should be at least comfortable with both areas…or I pray hard for me not to get them calculations in exam
March 22, 2014 at 7:54 pm #561758
NYCaccountantParticipantBasically, just line it up. the original price was $15,so when you bought it back for $17, technically thats a $2 loss, but you can't have a gain or loss on stock transactions, so you just debit retain earnings. That $2 difference is being paid back out of the corporations earnings and not the initial capital. So instead of 35,000, APIC went down by 25,000, and the additional was paid out of earnings, not initial capital. The max on your initial capital related to those shares was $$75,000 (5,000*15) original issue price, so the difference between 75,000 and $85,000 ($17*5,000) must be allocated to being paid out of earnings.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete. -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 83’ is closed to new replies.
