[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 401

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 6,001 through 6,015 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #566568
    NJPRU
    Member

    I agree with all of the above. 🙂

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566569
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Why do I find Sales leaseback so hard to understand LOL

    #566570
    stoleway
    Participant

    What will be the effect of liquidating dividend on declaration date?

    I). increase RE and reduces APIC

    II) Decreases RE and increase APIC

    III) Decreases RE and APIC

    IV) Decreases only RE

    A) i and ii

    b) iii and iv

    c) iv only

    d) iii only

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566571
    NJPRU
    Member

    d. i and iii

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566572
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I get III would be the case since in my mind if you Liquid a portion can be RE – which will be seen as cash Divi and some APIC

    which is the actual liquidating

    but I am puzzled as to why would it be possible 🙁

    IV to me means they just did a cash dividend and its not really liquidating as liquidations is return of capital invested.

    #566573
    stoleway
    Participant

    I tweaked the question once again, I think the choices were confusing, so lets try this one

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566574
    NJPRU
    Member

    A. i and ii

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566575
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Then i would pick D.

    God Help me Soul as i am confused a bat.

    #566576
    stoleway
    Participant

    Answer is D liquidating dividend reduces RE and the excess reduces APIC

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566577
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    On Jan 1 of current year, Lean co made an Investment of $10000. Following are PV of $1 discounted at 10%Interest rate.

    Periods 1 PV of $1 .909

    2 .826

    3 .751

    what amount of cash will he accumulate in 2 years?

    a.12107

    b.12000

    c.27002

    d.16250

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #566578
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Here is one

    A Company exchanged land with an appraised value of 50,000 and an original cost of 20,000 for a machinery with FV of 55,000. Assuming that the transaction has commercial substance what is the gain of exchange?

    a 0

    b 5,000

    c 30,000

    d 35,000

    #566579
    NJPRU
    Member

    OMG, I think i was confusing liquidating dividends for Quasi Reorganizations lol smh

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566580
    stoleway
    Participant

    @WANNABE_CPA

    A….10,000/.826= 12,107

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566581
    Lidis
    Participant

    A

    10000/.826 = 12,107

    #566582
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    Can someone explain me the PV question, i just never seem to understand PV and FV…shouldnt this be calculated with FV table because we need to find what amount will accumulate in 2 years…As per a statement in becker it says..use FV of $1 if the amount to accumulate at a future point in time if 1$ invested now?

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

Viewing 15 replies - 6,001 through 6,015 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 401’ is closed to new replies.