[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 392

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 5,866 through 5,880 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #566433
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    I took the practice test…and i got 83,80,73 in three testlets…average comes to be 78%.

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #566434
    stoleway
    Participant

    D is correct.

    Here is another one

    The Tax Court ruled in favor of the entity on October 25, Year 5. Litigation involved deductions claimed on the Year 1 and Year 2 tax returns. The entity had provided in accrued taxes payable for the full amount of the potential disallowances. The Internal Revenue Service will not appeal the Tax Court’s ruling. How should this event be presented in the financial statements?

    A. Disclosure by means of supplemental, pro forma financial data.

    B. Adjustment of the financial statements for the year ended September 30, Year 5.

    C. No financial statement disclosure necessary.

    D. Disclosure in a note to the financial statements.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566435
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    D. Disclosure in the Notes?

    #566436
    NJPRU
    Member

    nm lol i can't read.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566437
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    D ? – that was my first thought

    Then I started thinking Or wait its in favour of the company then there should be no change in FS …..

    #566438
    stoleway
    Participant

    Answer is B

    Just when I thought you cannot accrue a gain contigent:(

    The ruling of the Tax Court provides additional evidence with respect to conditions that existed at the date of the financial statements and affects the estimates used in their preparation. Consequently, the settlement in the subsequent events period for an amount different from that recorded requires the client to adjust the statements.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566439
    stoleway
    Participant

    A company’s foreign subsidiary operation maintains its financial statements in the local currency. The foreign operation’s capital accounts would be translated to the functional currency of the reporting entity using which of the following rates?

    A. Current exchange rate at the balance sheet date.

    B. Historical exchange rate.

    C. Functional exchange rate.

    D. Weighted-average exchange rate.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566440
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    B – Historical?

    I kind of am thinking about the flow chart that was in the Wiley book – I can picture it but i don't remember it well. LOL

    I remember something about remeasurement if Functional is not the same as Reporting.

    #566441

    Big Company buys 90 percent of the outstanding common stock of Little Company for $900,000. Big did not have to pay a control premium to get these shares so that the price paid is viewed as a reasonable representation of the value of the new subsidiary. Little has identifiable assets and liabilities with a net book value of $710,000 but a fair value of $820,000. On a consolidated balance sheet on that date, what should be reported as goodwill?

    A $80,000

    B $162,000

    C $180,000

    D $290,000

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #566442
    NJPRU
    Member

    b. historical.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566443

    Historical exchange rate is the answer

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #566444
    NJPRU
    Member

    willpass, I'm going to say 162k.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566445

    NJPRU it is 180k. 90% is 900k so 100% is 1 million including minority interest and then reduce net assets…remember you have to include minority interest share also to arrive at GW

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #566446
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    oh buggers

    #566447

    The paper division of a company generates an operating profit of $10,000 per month. On the final day of Year One, company officials decide to sell this division which has a book value of $540,000. These officials believe they can sell the paper division for $570,000 but only after spending $70,000 needed to make the sale. The paper division meets the rules to be classified as an asset held for sale. In addition, the division qualifies as a discontinued operation. It is actually sold for the anticipated amount during February, Year Two. Ignore income taxes. What does the company report at the bottom of its Year One income statement for the discontinued operation?

    50k

    80k

    120k

    0k

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

Viewing 15 replies - 5,866 through 5,880 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 392’ is closed to new replies.