[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 383

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. πŸ™‚

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 5,731 through 5,745 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #566298
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Stoleway, D for $9,000

    #566299
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    @Stoleway D

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God πŸ™‚
    BEC : 78 (8/27) πŸ™‚
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) πŸ™‚
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #566300
    stoleway
    Participant

    Answer is D

    The deferred tax liability constitutes the β€œdeferred tax consequences attributable to taxable temporary differences. A deferred tax liability is measured using the applicable enacted tax rate and provisions of the enacted tax law.” Taft’s recognition of $180,000 of equity-based earnings creates a temporary difference that will result in taxable amounts in future periods when dividends are distributed. The deferred tax liability arising from this temporary difference is measured using the 30% enacted tax rate and the dividends received deduction. Accordingly, given that all the undistributed earnings will be distributed, a deferred tax liability of $9,000 [($180,000 equity – $30,000 dividends received) Γ— 20% not deductible Γ— 30% tax rate applicable after the current year] should be reported.

    REG -63β”‚ 84!!
    BEC- 59β”‚70β”‚ 71 β”‚78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566301
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Here's how I got it:

    Earnings…. 180,000

    Less Div….. 30,000

    ……………


    Net Receipt 150,000

    …………………x 20%***

    ……………


    Taxable Inc… 30,000

    Enacted Tax ….30%

    ……………..


    DTL …………9,0000

    ***To simplify the rule of exemption of tax rate, let's just remember this:

    0-19% share => 30% Taxable

    20-80% share => 20% Taxable

    The rest is not taxable!

    #566302
    Not a Quitter
    Participant

    Hmm I messed up because I didn't subtract the $30k. Even reading the explanation I'm not understanding why that's done. I thought the $180k was undistributed earnings?

    FAR- 85 I'm DONE!
    BEC- 75
    REG- 60,60,75
    AUD- 74,74,83

    CPAExcel used for BEC, AUD, REG
    Exam Matrix used for FAR plus NINJA Blitz, cpareviewforfree and a little CPAExcel

    #566303
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Wannabe, I checked Becker's F4 SIM. I has 2 sets of SIMS.

    Be specific please. If you post the problem, someone from the group may be able to help explain it on the thread.

    #566304
    stoleway
    Participant

    Cor-Eng Partnership was formed on January 2 of the current year. Under the partnership agreement, each partner has an equal initial capital balance accounted for under the goodwill method. Partnership net income or loss is allocated 60% to Cor and 40% to Eng. To form the partnership, Cor originally contributed assets costing $30,000 with a fair value of $60,000 on January 2 of the current year, while Eng contributed $20,000 in cash. Drawings by the partners during the current year totaled $3,000 by Cor and $9,000 by Eng. The partnership’s current-year net income was $25,000. Eng’s initial capital balance in the partnership is

    A. $25,000

    B. $20,000

    C. $60,000

    D. $40,000

    REG -63β”‚ 84!!
    BEC- 59β”‚70β”‚ 71 β”‚78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566305
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    @Amor D, sorry i figured after spending few more minutes on it..Thanks for looking.

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God πŸ™‚
    BEC : 78 (8/27) πŸ™‚
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) πŸ™‚
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #566306
    Not a Quitter
    Participant

    @stoleway- C

    FAR- 85 I'm DONE!
    BEC- 75
    REG- 60,60,75
    AUD- 74,74,83

    CPAExcel used for BEC, AUD, REG
    Exam Matrix used for FAR plus NINJA Blitz, cpareviewforfree and a little CPAExcel

    #566307
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The wordings of: “The dividends received from Flame are eligible for the 80% dividends received deduction.” are bonus to the examinees.

    Becker's F6-49 about Investee's Undistributed Earnings lays this out:

    ALL PERMANENT DIFFERENCES

    Ownership 0-19%…………. 70% Exclusion

    Ownership 20-80%……….. 80% Exclusion

    Ownership over 80%……..100% Exclusion

    I found the above lay-out as ridiculously complicated.

    It could have been stated is a simpler note such as:

    0-19% share => 30% Taxable

    20-80% share => 20% Taxable

    The rest is not taxable!

    #566308
    NJPRU
    Member

    stoleway – c

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #566309
    stoleway
    Participant

    C is correct……………….how did you guys came up with C

    REG -63β”‚ 84!!
    BEC- 59β”‚70β”‚ 71 β”‚78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566310
    Not a Quitter
    Participant

    @ stoleway because of the words “an equal initial capital balance” which means Eng's contribution has to be bumped up to $60,000 to match the other contributor.

    FAR- 85 I'm DONE!
    BEC- 75
    REG- 60,60,75
    AUD- 74,74,83

    CPAExcel used for BEC, AUD, REG
    Exam Matrix used for FAR plus NINJA Blitz, cpareviewforfree and a little CPAExcel

    #566311
    stoleway
    Participant

    @NotaQuitter

    Thank you, I wasn't paying attention to that part of the puzzle.

    REG -63β”‚ 84!!
    BEC- 59β”‚70β”‚ 71 β”‚78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #566312
    stoleway
    Participant

    A city council designates funds in the enterprise fund for future equipment replacement. The enterprise fund should report this as

    A. An unrestricted component of net position.

    B. A net investment in capital assets.

    C. A restricted component of net position.

    D. A designated component of net position.

    REG -63β”‚ 84!!
    BEC- 59β”‚70β”‚ 71 β”‚78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

Viewing 15 replies - 5,731 through 5,745 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 383’ is closed to new replies.