[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 189

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,821 through 2,835 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #563338
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @stoleway–Consolidations are one of my worst topics. If you have any helpful tips before Friday, let me know. I don't know why I just can't get them. I'm fine with Fair Value and Equity, but not consolidations.

    #563339
    stoleway
    Participant

    @CPAMommyof3

    Sure, I will be glad to help out. All of these chapters contain broad topics, so it will be helpful if you can be specific as to where exactly you need help with 🙂

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #563340
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I just got this question wrong on my exam:

    On January 1, year 2, Neel Corp. issued 400,000 additional shares of $10 par value common stock in exchange for all of Pym Corp.’s common stock. Immediately before this business combination, Neel’s stockholders’ equity was $16,000,000 and Pym’s stockholders’ equity was $8,000,000. On January 1, year 2, the fair value of Neel’s common stock was $20 per share, and the fair value of Pym’s net assets was $8,000,000. Neel’s net income for the year ended December 31, year 2, exclusive of any consideration of Pym, was $2,500,000. Pym’s net income for the year ended December 31, year 2, was $600,000. During year 2 Neel paid dividends of $900,000. Neel had no business transactions with Pym in year 2.

    Assuming that this business combination is appropriately accounted for as a business acquisition, consolidated stockholders’ equity at December 31, year 2, should be

    A $17,600,000

    B $18,200,000

    C $26,200,000

    D $27,100,000

    #563341
    stoleway
    Participant

    @CPAMommyof3

    is the answer $17,600,000?….let me know if that's correct. That will give me more steam power to explain…lol

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #563342
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No–It's C $26,200,000. I answered $17.6 as well. The way Wiley explains it is:

    The requirement is to determine the consolidated stockholders’ equity after an acquisition accounted for as an acquisition. Under the acquisition method, the assets and liabilities are brought over at their fair value (ASC Topic 810). Therefore, the increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from the acquisition will be the fair value of the stock issued, or $8,000,000 ($20 x 400,000). The consolidated stockholders’ equity immediately after the business combination is $24,000,000 ($16,000,000 + $8,000,000). Stockholders’ equity is then increased by the consolidated net income of $3,100,000 ($2,500,000 + $600,000) and decreased by the $900,000 of dividends paid. Thus, stockholders’ equity at December 31, year 2, is $26,200,000 ($24,000,000 + $3,100,000 – $900,000). Note that under the purchase method, only the results of operations of the acquired company subsequent to the date of combination is combined with the acquiring company’s results. It is because the combination was entered into January 1, that the entire year’s income of the acquired company is included.

    It makes sense once I read the explanation, but I can't come up with this stuff on my own when working the problem.

    #563343
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Let me guess. A.$17,600,000?

    #563344
    stoleway
    Participant

    I'm curious about why the subsidiary's stock was consolidated. All the stocks of the subsidiary was bought by the parent and the parent shouldn't consolidate it at all, there is also no NCI. I doubt Wiley on this one

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #563345
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    My thoughts too. It just doesn't make any sense to me. I thought that with consolidations you exclue the SE of the acquired company in lieu of the fair value of their net assets, which is fine since they are both $8M. Okay–I can buy that. But I thought you only use the Net income of the parent company when you consolidate so why do we have to add the subsidiary's NI to the equation?

    #563346
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @M‘Bear, I was actually coming up with $25,600,000 (16.0 + 8.0 + 2.5 – 0.90), which was obviously not in the items for selection. The difference of that would be $600,000 NI of the subsidiary, which I highly doubted that should be included (since the theories strictly specify, as for NI, only the parent's NI is to recorded in the consolidated FS, while the subsidiary's NI needs to be eliminated.)

    #563347
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Amor–Yes! That's what I think too.

    #563348
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So we have to agree on the board now that:

    > only the parent's NI, RE, Dividends Declared/Paid, Capital Stock

    > Parent + Subs + Adjustment to FV for Current Assets

    > Parent (BV) + Subs (FV) for Plant Assets

    Thumbs down for Wiley for that item for now!

    #563349
    stoleway
    Participant

    I think they added the 600,000 because of the caveat below. The parent is using equity method to report income so it is assumed that 100% of the subsidiary's net income is added to the parents income. But if the caveat “EXCLUSIVE” is not stated then we will assumed that subsidiary's income has already been added to the final net income reported by the parent

    Neel’s net income for the year ended December 31, year 2, exclusive of any consideration of Pym, was $2,500,000

    But anyhow I think Wiley did a horrible job on this one!

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #563350
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Boooooooooooo! I guess it makes sense, but no way would I catch that on the real exam. Glad I'm not the only one tripped up by that question. Gotta call it a night. Thanks guys!

    #563351
    lexus423
    Participant

    Studying ratios and pensions tonight. Are pensions heavily tested?

    FAR- 2014
    AUD- 2014
    REG- 2014
    BEC- 2014

    #563352
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Shhhhhh

Viewing 15 replies - 2,821 through 2,835 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 189’ is closed to new replies.