[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 175

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,611 through 2,625 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #563128
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    Good luck next week.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #563129
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    I have been out studying and doing my job search.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #563130
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Good luck with your studies and with the job search!!

    #563131
    klink24
    Participant

    Before I get into it, let me start by saying relax! Looks like you're panicked a bit, and rightfully so. The test is daunting, but you're one of the brightest I've seen on here. Be confident like JRo said!

    Here's what I have for Foreign Currency (God I hope I don't confuse things any further! If so, don't read any more than once).

    First thing I had to understand is that the Functional Currency is either the Local (Recording) or Reporting. There are not 3 different types as I initially thought, just 2 that can be designated as Functional. Reporting is typically the dollar since we're in the US so make that assumption when thinking things through.

    If Local = Functional, Gain/Loss (G/L) is in OCI. If Functional = Reporting, G/L is Income. Since US is Reporting, and foreign “functions” as US, include in income. On the flip side, Local is foreign, and foreign “functions” as foreign, so put it in OCI.

    The exchange rates to use are the same for almost everything whether the Functional = Local or Functional = Reporting. The only difference is for non-monetary assets carried at cost which is recorded at the historical rate.

    Rationale:

    Same Accounting whether Functional = Local or Functional = Reporting:

    For Revenues, Expenses, Gains, and Losses, you use either the rate when earned/incurred or the weighted average rate.

    Use the historical rate to translate PIC, but not any rate before initial consolidation.

    Use the rate at the Balance Sheet date for monetary (or non-monetary carried at market) assets and liabilities.

    Differences:

    Functional = Local, translate non-monetary Assets and Liabilities carried at cost using the rate at the Balance Sheet date. (so really, if Functional = Local, you use the rate at the Balance Sheet date for all Assets and Liabilities).

    Functional = Reporting, translate non-monetary Assets and Liabilities carried at cost using the historical rate.

    So most of it is exactly the same as far as the rates to use to translate, except for the non-monetary assets carried at cost.

    Using the assumption that the US is the reporting currency, it makes since to record these at historical rate because the assets and liabilities are part of the “functions” of the US.

    Hope this helps!!

    FAR: 4/19/2014 - 85!
    AUD: 5/27/2014 - 90!
    REG: 7/18/2014 - 81!
    BEC: 8/13/2014 - 84!

    4 up, 4 down, in 4 months.

    Licensed 9/22 in NC.

    #563132
    klink24
    Participant

    Excerpt of my explanation on just the exchange rates:

    The exchange rates to use are the same for almost everything whether the Functional = Local or Functional = Reporting. The only difference is for non-monetary assets carried at cost which is recorded at the historical rate.

    For Revenues, Expenses, Gains, and Losses, you use either the rate when earned/incurred or the weighted average rate.

    Use the historical rate to translate PIC, but not any rate before initial consolidation.

    Use the rate at the Balance Sheet date for monetary (or non-monetary carried at market) assets and liabilities.

    Differences:

    Functional = Local, translate non-monetary Assets and Liabilities carried at cost using the rate at the Balance Sheet date. (so really, if Functional = Local, you use the rate at the Balance Sheet date for all Assets and Liabilities).

    Functional = Reporting, translate non-monetary Assets and Liabilities carried at cost using the historical rate.

    FAR: 4/19/2014 - 85!
    AUD: 5/27/2014 - 90!
    REG: 7/18/2014 - 81!
    BEC: 8/13/2014 - 84!

    4 up, 4 down, in 4 months.

    Licensed 9/22 in NC.

    #563133
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks Nclynch! So just to make sure I understand without looking at what you typed again or at my notes:

    If functional=local then all assets and liabilities use the current exchange rate

    If functional-reporting then monetary A and L use the current exchange rate, nonmonetary balance sheet items use the historical exchange rate, the Income statement items use the weighted average (except for those items that are related to balance sheet items, which use the historical rate)

    Is that correct?

    #563134
    klink24
    Participant

    @CPAMom, yes, that's correct! Just remember though, for income statement items, you can also use the rate when the items were earned/incurred as well. Also, non-monetary assets carried at market value are valued using the current rate. I saw a question specific to non-monetary carried using the market rate when functional = reporting.

    Can someone else confirm mine and CPAMom's posts on foreign currency transactions as well?! Just want to make sure we have this right!

    FAR: 4/19/2014 - 85!
    AUD: 5/27/2014 - 90!
    REG: 7/18/2014 - 81!
    BEC: 8/13/2014 - 84!

    4 up, 4 down, in 4 months.

    Licensed 9/22 in NC.

    #563135
    klink24
    Participant

    I have a question related to disclosures and IFRS. Does everyone just try to memorize or are there broad statements that can be made about disclosures and IFRS for each item/transaction? For instance, I know IFRS is more conceptual than specific, so that helps sometimes. I can't imagine trying to memorize all specific disclosures required and IFRS differences.

    FAR: 4/19/2014 - 85!
    AUD: 5/27/2014 - 90!
    REG: 7/18/2014 - 81!
    BEC: 8/13/2014 - 84!

    4 up, 4 down, in 4 months.

    Licensed 9/22 in NC.

    #563136
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    @Pia you probably crushed the exam. I did not notice a change in difficulty when I took the exam either. I felt like it was not hard at all actually. Hope you passed!

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #563137
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @nclynch–I just took another quiz on foreign currency using what we agreed on and I raised my grade to 74%, which would have been higher if I had read more slowly. So I think we are correct!!

    #563138
    jasbeerch
    Member

    @cpamom

    Is there any practice test in wiley new version, that they divide by topic wise % depends on the correct answers.

    like bonds- 70%, fixed assets – 50% (I saw in wiley older version).

    Did you see something like that in Wiley new test bank?

    #563139
    jasbeerch
    Member
    #563140
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I haven't used the new test bank yet. I haven't heard a lot of good things about it so I'm going to use the old bank until they won't let me use it anymore.

    #563141
    LStevens225
    Participant

    Does anyone ever feel like after a few hours intense studying you brain goes “nope… you're done”? lol I feel like I just got there. I will master consolidations today!!

    #563142
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    Just finished the 1/2 mark…of videos. Just need to finish the HW and then on to Pensions….

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

Viewing 15 replies - 2,611 through 2,625 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 175’ is closed to new replies.