- This topic has 6,668 replies, 191 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
Kenada.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:58 pm #183478
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 27, 2014 at 3:17 am #562030
jrosen92770ParticipantCPAMommy – According to Becker, it is for “Exchanges Lacking Commercial Substance”. Section F2-38 (page)
BEC - 5/26/2013 75
REG - 8/31/2013 82
AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
FAR - 5/25/2014 85NY CPA
March 27, 2014 at 3:18 am #562031
AnonymousInactiveDang it–I have it in the wrong place in my notes. The % is calculated for transactions that LACK commercial substance. Booo. Thanks JRosen. This was a good idea. I hope to see you guys here tomorrow night. I'm studying from 6:00 to 11:00.
@AleFLCPA–You are correct!!
March 27, 2014 at 3:19 am #562032
AnonymousInactiveMarch 27, 2014 at 3:23 am #562033
jrosen92770ParticipantThis is going to help all of us to pass so we can start living again 🙂
BEC - 5/26/2013 75
REG - 8/31/2013 82
AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
FAR - 5/25/2014 85NY CPA
March 27, 2014 at 3:28 am #562034
AmayMemberJust popping in to say RTMFQ! That's all. Thanks. Bye.
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
March 27, 2014 at 3:30 am #562035
SpartanCPAMemberSo does anyone understand the profit/loss concept on sale lease-backs for operating and capital? I just re-read the part in Becker and am lost.
AUD - 01/18/14 - 81
BEC - 05/29/14 - 85
FAR - 07/18/14 - 81
REG - 11/18/14 - 80Becker CPA Review
NINJA Audio
Michigan State UniversityMarch 27, 2014 at 3:31 am #562036
teeteenounoucheMemberlmao Amay! I was just saying that to myself while in WTB…I think I found my tattoo idea, if anyone remembers that thread 🙂
Florida:
AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree
March 27, 2014 at 3:36 am #562037
jrosen92770ParticipantOr we can do a rubber bracelet like Live Strong that says RTMFQ 2X.
BEC - 5/26/2013 75
REG - 8/31/2013 82
AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
FAR - 5/25/2014 85NY CPA
March 27, 2014 at 3:44 am #562038
AmayMember@ Spartan for capital leases it depends on how much the lessee/seller will retain once they sell the lease. If they retain substantially all rights (90% +) then lessee must defer all gain over the life of the asset. If minor retention (less than 10%) recognize the entire gain when the sale of the asset is recorded. If mid-range retention (10-90%), they must defer any gain up to the PV of the capitalized asset with any excess gain recognized immediately. For example, if the gain is 50k but the present value of the capitalized asset is 40k, then only 40k can be deferred and the remaining 10k can be recognized immediately.
For operating leases, the only difference is when it comes to the mid-range retention (10-90%). Same thing as capital except they must defer any gain up to the PV of the MLPs (minimum lease payments). Remainder of gain is recognized.
Summary:
subs. all (>90%) – defer all
minor (<10%)- recognize
mid (10-90%) – defer up to PV of asset (capital) or MLPs (operating)
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
March 27, 2014 at 3:45 am #562039
AmayMemberYou guys think the Prometric attendant will think I am cheating if I have a fake tattoo bracelet with RTMFQ?
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
March 27, 2014 at 3:51 am #562040
jrosen92770ParticipantNo, they may ask where you got your cool looking bracelet.
BEC - 5/26/2013 75
REG - 8/31/2013 82
AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
FAR - 5/25/2014 85NY CPA
March 27, 2014 at 3:56 am #562041
teeteenounoucheMemberjrosen92770, love that idea! RTMFQ 2X!
Florida:
AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree
March 27, 2014 at 4:05 am #562042
missbehaved8907MemberOn January 2, Elbert's Delivery Company and Wanda's Exporters exchanged similar delivery trucks in an exchange that lacks commercial substance. Data relative to the trucks follow:
Elbert's truck
Original cost $10,000
Accumulated depreciation as of January 2 8,000
Fair market value 3,000
Wanda's truck
Book value $15,000
In the exchange, Elbert paid Wanda cash of $10,000. Elbert's Delivery Company should record the new truck at:
a. $13,000
b. $8,000
c. $12,000
d. $10,000
Choice “a” is correct. The new truck is recorded at $13,000 on Elbert's books. In this case, the transaction is considered to be a monetary exchange, because the boot ($10,000) exceeds 25% of the total consideration ($10,000 plus $3,000 fair value of the old truck transferred to Wanda). Therefore, both parties to the exchange recognize all gains and losses on the transaction.
The journal entry prepared by Elbert follows:
Truck-New $ 13,000
Accum. Depre. 8,000
Cash $ 10,000
Truck-Old 10,000
Gain 1,000
I thought in a monetary exchange that lacks commercial substance, when boot is paid, no gain is recognized. Can someone help to clarify for me why there is a gain recognized?
REG (08/2011 - 73)
AUD (01/2013 - 63) (04/2013 - 72)
FAR (11/2013 - 61) (02/2014)- 71)
BEC - No attemptMarch 27, 2014 at 4:16 am #562043
SpartanCPAMember@misbehaved8907 The keyword here is “monetary”. I assume you are getting it confused with “nonmonetary” exchanges?
AUD - 01/18/14 - 81
BEC - 05/29/14 - 85
FAR - 07/18/14 - 81
REG - 11/18/14 - 80Becker CPA Review
NINJA Audio
Michigan State UniversityMarch 27, 2014 at 4:17 am #562044
teeteenounoucheMembermissbehaved8907, for a nonmonetary exchange, lacking commercial substance:
• Gains are recognized based on the nature of the transaction:
o No boot received =No gain
o Boot given =No gain
o Boot >= 25% of total consideration received = Recognize all gain
o Boot < 25% of total consideration received = Recognize gain in proportion to boot received
Florida:
AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 102’ is closed to new replies.
