[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 102

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #562030
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    CPAMommy – According to Becker, it is for “Exchanges Lacking Commercial Substance”. Section F2-38 (page)

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #562031
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Dang it–I have it in the wrong place in my notes. The % is calculated for transactions that LACK commercial substance. Booo. Thanks JRosen. This was a good idea. I hope to see you guys here tomorrow night. I'm studying from 6:00 to 11:00.

    @AleFLCPA–You are correct!!

    #562032
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks JRosen–I don't have Becker, but I just looked it up in my Wiley book. I was wrong. I am 0/3 on your questions. I will be better prepared tomorrow. It is ON! 🙂

    #562033
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    This is going to help all of us to pass so we can start living again 🙂

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #562034
    Amay
    Member

    Just popping in to say RTMFQ! That's all. Thanks. Bye.

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

    #562035
    SpartanCPA
    Member

    So does anyone understand the profit/loss concept on sale lease-backs for operating and capital? I just re-read the part in Becker and am lost.

    AUD - 01/18/14 - 81
    BEC - 05/29/14 - 85
    FAR - 07/18/14 - 81
    REG - 11/18/14 - 80

    Becker CPA Review
    NINJA Audio
    Michigan State University

    #562036

    lmao Amay! I was just saying that to myself while in WTB…I think I found my tattoo idea, if anyone remembers that thread 🙂

    Florida:
    AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
    BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
    REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
    FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!

    CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree

    #562037
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    Or we can do a rubber bracelet like Live Strong that says RTMFQ 2X.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #562038
    Amay
    Member

    @ Spartan for capital leases it depends on how much the lessee/seller will retain once they sell the lease. If they retain substantially all rights (90% +) then lessee must defer all gain over the life of the asset. If minor retention (less than 10%) recognize the entire gain when the sale of the asset is recorded. If mid-range retention (10-90%), they must defer any gain up to the PV of the capitalized asset with any excess gain recognized immediately. For example, if the gain is 50k but the present value of the capitalized asset is 40k, then only 40k can be deferred and the remaining 10k can be recognized immediately.

    For operating leases, the only difference is when it comes to the mid-range retention (10-90%). Same thing as capital except they must defer any gain up to the PV of the MLPs (minimum lease payments). Remainder of gain is recognized.

    Summary:

    subs. all (>90%) – defer all

    minor (<10%)- recognize

    mid (10-90%) – defer up to PV of asset (capital) or MLPs (operating)

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

    #562039
    Amay
    Member

    You guys think the Prometric attendant will think I am cheating if I have a fake tattoo bracelet with RTMFQ?

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

    #562040
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    No, they may ask where you got your cool looking bracelet.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #562041

    jrosen92770, love that idea! RTMFQ 2X!

    Florida:
    AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
    BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
    REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
    FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!

    CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree

    #562042

    On January 2, Elbert's Delivery Company and Wanda's Exporters exchanged similar delivery trucks in an exchange that lacks commercial substance. Data relative to the trucks follow:

    Elbert's truck

    Original cost $10,000

    Accumulated depreciation as of January 2 8,000

    Fair market value 3,000

    Wanda's truck

    Book value $15,000

    In the exchange, Elbert paid Wanda cash of $10,000. Elbert's Delivery Company should record the new truck at:

    a. $13,000

    b. $8,000

    c. $12,000

    d. $10,000

    Choice “a” is correct. The new truck is recorded at $13,000 on Elbert's books. In this case, the transaction is considered to be a monetary exchange, because the boot ($10,000) exceeds 25% of the total consideration ($10,000 plus $3,000 fair value of the old truck transferred to Wanda). Therefore, both parties to the exchange recognize all gains and losses on the transaction.

    The journal entry prepared by Elbert follows:

    Truck-New $ 13,000

    Accum. Depre. 8,000

    Cash $ 10,000

    Truck-Old 10,000

    Gain 1,000

    I thought in a monetary exchange that lacks commercial substance, when boot is paid, no gain is recognized. Can someone help to clarify for me why there is a gain recognized?

    REG (08/2011 - 73)
    AUD (01/2013 - 63) (04/2013 - 72)
    FAR (11/2013 - 61) (02/2014)- 71)
    BEC - No attempt

    #562043
    SpartanCPA
    Member

    @misbehaved8907 The keyword here is “monetary”. I assume you are getting it confused with “nonmonetary” exchanges?

    AUD - 01/18/14 - 81
    BEC - 05/29/14 - 85
    FAR - 07/18/14 - 81
    REG - 11/18/14 - 80

    Becker CPA Review
    NINJA Audio
    Michigan State University

    #562044

    missbehaved8907, for a nonmonetary exchange, lacking commercial substance:

    • Gains are recognized based on the nature of the transaction:

    o No boot received =No gain

    o Boot given =No gain

    o Boot >= 25% of total consideration received = Recognize all gain

    o Boot < 25% of total consideration received = Recognize gain in proportion to boot received

    Florida:
    AUD: 73, 81! Thank you Lord!
    BEC: 73, 77! Thank you Lord! and WTB
    REG: 71, 82! Thank you Lord! and A71
    FAR: 72, 78! Thank you God and my Mommy in Heaven!

    CPA Excel, Ninja Notes & Audio, Wiley Test Bank, CPAreviewforfree

Viewing 15 replies - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 102’ is closed to new replies.