FAR Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 6

Viewing 15 replies - 76 through 90 (of 373 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1686560
    Jen-J
    Participant

    NaNa.9 – the version of Becker for FAR exams starting in January is version 3.1 for both the regular book and Final Review. (Note, this is not the version number for other exams. AUD and REG are on 3.2. BEC is still on 3.0 for Q1).

    #1686563
    amens
    Participant

    @Bianca I'm glad I am not the only one who struggles with this. I haven't found a way to properly determine this either and have found myself answering by memory.

    If anyone has figured this out I'd really appreciate it too.

    #1686565
    amens
    Participant

    Does anyone know of any significant changes from 2017 to 2018. I only see some noticeable changes in Revenue recognition, but I just want to make sure I am not missing anything.

    #1686568
    Bianca
    Participant

    @ash

    I may have possibly figured it out.. if I am wrong someone please correct me.

    Gross Profit= Contract Price- Total Estimated Cost*

    GP %=Total Costs incurred to date/Total Estimated Cost*

    ***I have realized that the Total Estimated cost includes both cost incurred to date + estimated costs to complete.

    “Costs incurred to date” may be given or it may have to be solved for by adding indivual years costs incurred to the year you are solving for.

    For example, if trying to find GP to date for the 2nd year of the contract, we are to add cost incurred for Y1 + cost incurred for Y2/COst incurred for Y1+ Cost incurred for Y2+ Costs to complete in order to find GP% for Y2, then multiply % by estimated GP and deduct previously recognized GP to find Y2 GP to date.

    I realized that the wording is very important to pay attention to. If “costs incurred in Y1,Y2,Y3, etc” given, then each year needs to be added together for the numerator. Whereas if “costs incurred to date” are given, then you just take that number as the numerator for GP%.

    Hope this makes some sort of sense to you as it does to me.

    #1686575
    Anna
    Participant

    Hi Everyone,

    FAR is the first section that I plan on concurring. I am using Roger am my main study tool with Ninja MC. I am schedule to take it on February 17th. I originally planned to take it December, but as the time came closer to exam day, I had to reschedule because I was not ready. I was working full time, so I found it really hard to find time to study. I am trying something this time because I'll be home on maternity leave for a little while.

    Hopefully I can keep up this time around. Good Luck everyone!

    #1687867
    Bianca
    Participant

    Maybe I am missing something? If the cost of inventory was not included doesn't this mean that expense is understated, which means Net Income is over stated which would require a DECREASE in Net Income (net of tax) to be removed from the beginning Retained Earnings?

    Can someone please clear this up for me?!!

    Tack, Inc., reported a retained earnings balance of $150,000 on December 31, 20X1. In June 20X2, Tack discovered that merchandise costing $40,000 had not been included in inventory in its 20X1 financial statements. Tack has a 30% tax rate. What amount should Tack report as adjusted beginning retained earnings in its statement of retained earnings at December 31, 20X2?

    A.
    $190,000

    B.
    $178,000

    C.
    $150,000

    D.Incorrect
    $122,000

    #1687885
    mskcle
    Participant

    Bianca,

    The 40,000 excluded would mean ending inventory was understated which would overstate COGS by 40,000. This overstatement of COGS results in NI being lower. The adjustment should be 28,000 (40,000x.7) which would be added back to Retained Earnings for the answer of (B) $178,000.
    Original Error:
    BI
    + Purchases
    =COGAFS
    -EI (down 40K)
    =COGS (Up 40K)

    REV
    -COGS (Up 40k)
    NI (Down 40k)

    #1687949
    Bianca
    Participant

    @mskcle Thank you for the reply. I discovered my error when I found the same question in Becker. Becker gave a more thorough explanation. Thanks again

    #1688030
    smart
    Participant

    I am with u testing in January 7. But little chickened out. I got 73 on Dec 3. Not too much courage to conquer it in January. How about u?

    #1688071
    Zepp
    Participant

    Hi everyone! I just graduated with my 150 about two weeks ago. I have already started studying for FAR using Becker (provided by my firm I am starting at next week). I feel as if I am over studying but that is just my nature.

    I am intending to take FAR the first week of April as I probably will not receive my NTS until mid-March based on the timeline outlined by NASBA.

    Intended Exam Dates:

    FAR – 4/7
    AUD – 6/10
    REG – 9/10
    BEC – 11/15

    My firm gives a bonus for passing all of them within the first year of employment, hence my desire to get them accomplished as quickly as possible.

    Good luck to everyone!

    #1688084
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am scheduled to take FAR on February 6th. Currently using Roger. The MCQs seem very helpful. Do you have any suggestions on the best way to combine the video lectures, book reading, and note taking?
    Thank you!

    #1688197
    JAStansel
    Participant

    @chasingrainbows I found the best way for me to study Roger was to read the text first, then listen to his lectures, skipping any class question lectures. I would then watch the videos provided by Ninja Plus of Bob Monette that corresponded to the same section in Roger. I found that Bob's videos really helped to break down things Roger may have rushed or assumed you remembered from previous accounting courses. Once I started watching the corresponding videos from Bob, I would go back and do Roger's class questions and listen to those lectures explaining the answers. This method enabled me to answer Roger's class questions with much more ease and less mistakes. There will be more differences between Roger and Bob now that the 2018 changes have taken effect, but I still think this method could prove useful to you.

    #1688462
    Jen-J
    Participant

    Zepp – I know the NASBA website says it takes 6 weeks to get an NTS. It's nonsense. I got my last one in 5 days, and the 6 month clock started with the day I requested the NTS. (I had already sent my transcript a few weeks earlier though, I wanted to make sure they had that first. They'll hold your transcript for a year with no application but they'll only hold an application for 45 days waiting on the transcript.) Something to keep in mind when applying for NTS's for multiple sections so that you don't apply too early. (That said, I'd apply as soon as you are reasonably sure what sections you'll get through in 6 months, so you can schedule your testing appointments.)

    #1688465
    haj
    Participant

    Hi All

    Taking FAR in February. Waiting for evaluation review to come through. Thanks!

    #1688621
    ds34168
    Participant

    Failed FAR with a 68, planning to retake in March. How to study for this beast?

Viewing 15 replies - 76 through 90 (of 373 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 6’ is closed to new replies.