- This topic has 373 replies, 120 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 2 months ago by
Tncincy.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 11, 2017 at 10:57 am #1676690
jeff
KeymasterWelcome to the Q1 2018 CPA Exam Study Group for FAR. 🙂
Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your exam.
The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 6, 2018 at 10:35 am #1725799
Anonymous
InactiveThank you Sona & JayJack.
@Cpanda, to add to Anyatver’s post, SCF is required in commercial, NFP, and government accounting. All three treat principal paid on capital debt as part of financing activities. However in government accounting, it’s specified in capital financing activities, since govt. has 4 types of activities (additional “noncapital financing”) as compared to the other 2 with only 3 types of activities. The other difference in govt. is that, interest and dividends are classified under investing activities.
March 6, 2018 at 2:13 pm #1726001SONA
ParticipantWhat is the Raio Based on?
Cancer Educators, a not-for-profit entity, incurred costs of $10,000 when it combined program functions with significant fundraising functions. Which of the following cost allocations might Cancer report in its statement of activities?
A.
Program services: $0; Fundraising: $0; General services: $10,000B.
Program services: $0; Fundraising: $6,000; General services: $4,000C.
Program services: $6,000; Fundraising: $4,000; General services: $0Incorrect D.
Program services: $10,000; Fundraising: $0; General services: $0You answered D. The correct answer is C.
FASB ASC 958-720-45-29 through 45-37 states that joint costs should be allocated between fundraising and the appropriate program or management and general function if three criteria are met. Otherwise, all of the joint costs should be considered fundraising costs (not one of the answer choices given). The criteria are purpose, audience, and content. The purpose of the joint activity must include accomplishing program or management and general functions, with a specific activity by the audience and a specific activity by the recipient to that end. If the criteria are not met, all the costs are considered fundraising costs. Fundraising activities that are incidental to program or management and general activities would not require all costs to be considered fundraising costs or to be allocated.
March 6, 2018 at 2:14 pm #1726007March 6, 2018 at 3:48 pm #1726129DoubleBogey
Participant@cpanda
If it is a liability then the principal will be financing. If it is a receivable( a loan from the company) then it would be an investing activity. It just depends on whether you lent the money or borrowed it.
March 6, 2018 at 4:01 pm #1726142shawn0216
ParticipantCan anyone explain this question on NFP?
United Together, a labor union, had the following revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, Year 1:
Receipts:
Per capita dues $680,000
Initiation fees 90,000
Sales of organizational supplies 60,000
Nonexpendable gift restricted by donor for loan purposes for 10 years 30,000
Nonexpendable gift restricted by donor for loan purposes in perpetuity 25,000
Expenses:
Labor negotiations $500,000
Fundraising 100,000
Membership development 50,000
Administrative and general 200,000
Additional information:
The union's constitution provides that 10% of the per capita dues are designated for the Strike Insurance Fund to be distributed for strike relief at the discretion of the union's executive board.
In United Together's statement of activity for the year ended December 31, Year 1, what amount should be reported under the classification of contributions – without donor restrictions?
A. $55,000
B. $25,000
C. $0
D. $30,000
Explanation
Choice “A” is correct. $55,000.
In United Together's statement of activity, the amount that should be reported under the classification of “contributions – with donor restrictions” would include the nonexpendable gifts restricted by the donor for loan purposes for 10 years. Funds restricted for loans in perpetuity and donations restricted in perpetuity or whose restrictions are temporary in nature would be classified as increased to net assets with donor restrictions.I thought the answer would be $0 because the contributions are classified as “with donor restrictions:.
March 6, 2018 at 4:28 pm #1726162shawn0216
ParticipantJust kidding. I thought the answer would be $25,000 because the contribution was perpetual in nature
March 6, 2018 at 5:01 pm #1726172MeanJoe
ParticipantBecker right?
The correct answer 100% is $0.
The question is incorrectly worded. I emailed Becker about it saying that the answer and question directly contradict and this was their reply.
“As the question is written the answer should be $0. There was a mistake made when loading the question and it was supposed to ask for the “with donor restrictions”. This has been submitted to the Curriculum for correction. It will be posted to the errata site and the software corrected in with a future update. ”
In a NFP there are exactly two classifications of net assets.
Contributions with donor restrictions
Contributions without donor restrictionsI would disregard that question and move on to the next one as it is incorrect.
March 6, 2018 at 5:11 pm #1726187shawn0216
Participant@Meanjoe – THANK YOU!!!
I thought I was going crazy.
March 6, 2018 at 5:14 pm #1726189MeanJoe
ParticipantThe question is OK… not the best.
Cancer Educators, a not-for-profit entity, incurred costs of $10,000 when it combined program functions with significant fundraising functions. Which of the following cost allocations might Cancer report in its statement of activities?
So we know that when you combined Program functions with Fundraising functions the total costs equal $10,000.00
A cost can only be a program cost if it is directly related to the mission of the NFP. Lets say the NFP Organization's mission is to educate children. A program cost would be teachers salaries or educational materials. ANY other cost that does not directly work towards their mission is a support cost.
A.
Program services: $0; Fundraising: $0; General services: $10,000 – Can't be this answer because the question told us that when we combined program costs and fundraising costs the total was $10,000… Program and Fundraising are both ZERO.B.
Program services: $0; Fundraising: $6,000; General services: $4,000 – Can't be this answer because the question told us that when we combined program costs and fundraising costs the total was $10,000… Program is zero?C.
Program services: $6,000; Fundraising: $4,000; General services: $0 When we combine program and fundraising, total cost is $10,000. This one works.Incorrect D.
Program services: $10,000; Fundraising: $0; General services: $0 – Can't be this answer because the question told us that when we combined program costs and fundraising costs the total was $10,000… Fundraising is zero?Again I do not love this question but when you do process of elimination the best answer is C. of $6k Program & $4k Fundraising.
March 6, 2018 at 7:38 pm #1726370gguzman
Participant@anyatver
Thanks. Makes me feel better knowing that it is possible to fit in SIMS during final two weeks.
Keeping it going tonight. You're right, it should be a learning experience. I think I need to be in the right mindset when I sit down to study.
March 6, 2018 at 8:39 pm #1726445shawn0216
ParticipantI keep hearing and reading about people getting tested heavily on Gov/NFP MCQs. Does anyone know if this is the same for the simulations as well?
March 7, 2018 at 8:28 am #1726661Pam
Participant@shawn0216
Yes, I used Becker for all of them… all of them I failed the first time (except AUD)… BEC was terrible for me (maybe b/c it's like a junk drawer and I think of myself as more methodical), but finally passed that… my Becker expired so I'm using NINJA now. I'm doing the MCQs… Tuesday ended up not being a half day so today is focusing on getting my sections all up to around 80% average score and tomorrow doing SIMS.
If you have time, pick a SIM per section withe Becker or do it through the mock exams if not. The “wrap up” portion of each chapter of Becker was pretty good.
according to the blueprint this is the weight – but I've always read NFP/Gov't is all over the place on the exam:
Content Area Allocation Weight
I . Conceptual Framework, Standard-Setting and Financial Reporting 25–35%
II . Select Financial Statement Accounts 30–40%
III . Select Transactions 20–30%
IV . State and Local Governments 5–15%Application 50-60%: Application tasks are in all four areas of the FAR blueprint. These tasks, such as preparing journal entries and financial statements, frequently require newly licensed CPAs to use accounting concepts and standards to measure and recognize financial statement amounts
Hopefully that helps – if you're limited in time, focus on the top 2 (or 3) areas and make sure you know how to apply them
I understand that this is easier said than done – I'm in the same boat and select transactions is one of my weak areas (along with gov't)UGH. Best wishes to all! I need this! REG is on the line (chopping block 4/20). 3 down, 1 to go
March 7, 2018 at 8:28 am #1726663Anonymous
Inactive@shawn0216-gov't SIMS are unlikely. I would recommend checking out another thread on here called FAR SIMS straight from AICPA blueprint. According to a webinar back in Q417, participants were told that any task on the blueprint labeled “analysis” category is a fair game for a SIM. I can attest that it's true having taken it twice. That thread actually mapped the Becker SIMS to the blueprint to help focus your studies. Having said all that, government is very heavily tested in MCQ, the 5-15% is bs, like all the other breakdowns…You just never know what type of test you will get so I would strongly recommend studying government/NFP accounting.
March 7, 2018 at 9:34 am #1726765shawn0216
ParticipantMan… you guys are truly the best. Thanks @Pam and @anyatver! Could not be more thankful for all the useful insight 🙂
Good luck to you both!!
March 7, 2018 at 10:30 am #1726820Anonymous
Inactive@shawn0216, insight is all I got:) LOL!
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 22’ is closed to new replies.