@Cruz818 – My feelings were mixed. They were certainly thorough with the material. I took FAR for the first time in Q3 last year. And had spent, in retrospect, too long on the material with Wiley. Because it was summer and there was the long release, I studied for 2.5 months and I think it wasn't concentrated enough. There are SO many lessons for FAR, and it took a long time to get through. One frustration was definitely the way there was a lesson and you'd get to the end and they'd say the chance of this being tested is super super small but if you do see a question, you'll get it. There was just so much to cram into my mind! But FAR is massive. I think they maybe try to cover a little too much.
I would say Wiley is great for the key areas, but they almost leave it up to you to determine the key areas, if you know what I mean. It was, at the time 240+ lessons. No way you can be an expert on all. I'd say if you are getting those numbers on MCQs, you should feel pretty good. Just try to focus on the highly tested areas and keep going back to take progress tests like you are. I do think most of their videos are good. I learned Govt very well from them and Pam Smith's cost to accrual formula is the only thing that has worked for me.
And I will say, just try to expose yourself to some SIMs, even though I agree, they grade horribly, but I feel most do. I am finding that reviewing some SIMS in big areas, like leases, pensions, adjusting entries, is helpful to make sure I am understanding what they may ask. Hope that helps.
I'm in a similar boat to you, regarding your story. I went back for a second bachelor's in accounting year's later and tackling the CPA in my mid-30s. Best of luck to you.
.