- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 8 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
So, earlier today I sat for my first CPA exam, FAR. In hindsight, I’m definitely glad it was the first one I took, and having done 0 research of any changes being made to the exam in Q2 of 2018, I went into the exam understanding that there were 8 sims, the grade was split 50/50 between sims and MCQ and that was just the way it was and had always been, at least for awhile. Testlet 1 was ridiculously easy. Testlet 2 was easy however wordier questions that required slightly more calculation. Testlet 3 I was blown away instantly and thought, “Okay, they are front loading the dense material in the earlier sims, I’m sure Testlet 4 and 5 will be something I’ve actually seen while studying every SIM Becker had to offer”. NOPE
I won’t get into the abysmal feeling I had while managing 6-11 exhibits on well over 4 sims and compiling them all together into a full length F/S with adjusting entries only to have nearly all of them NOT balance (you get the feeling by now anyway). I do have a question that may garner me some semblance of hope on my outcome, however. I have read that if Testlet 2 feels harder than Testlet 1, it may be due to having done well on T1 and so they give you a more difficult T2. Does this apply to T3-5 with simulations? I doubt it, but I can find 0 explanation as to how absolutely stunned I was when I opened up T3-5, scanned through each SIM and realized I was wholly unprepared for the depth being asked of me to present.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.