Roger MCQ

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #202872
    zvm77us
    Participant

    I know this subject has been beaten to death already, but I saw someone mention that UWorld Roger CPA Review improved his MCQ’s and they have gotten harder. How are they now compared to Becker and Ninja MCQ?

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #781934
    Texan_176
    Participant

    Roger's test bank is much better than before but NINJA MCQ is the one that IMHO best prepares you for the exam.

    AUD - 83
    BEC - 77
    FAR - 83
    REG - 78
    Licensed TX CPA

    BEC 11/29/14 77 (Roger)
    AUD 2/23/15 60 (Roger) 4/13/2015 83 (Roger & Ninja MCQ)
    REG 5/30/2015 66 (Roger & Ninja MCQ(7 hours only)) 8/23/2015 78 (Roger & Ninja MCQ)
    FAR 11/23/2015 60 (Roger & NINJA MCQ) 2/24/2016 74 (Roger & NINJA MCQ) 5/25/2016 83 (Roger+Roger CRAM & NINJA MCQ/NOTES)
    Texas Ethics Exam 92%

    Licensed TX CPA Aug 2016

    #781935
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    I haven't used it that much since the new update, but one feature I like is the answer choices get switched around, making it harder to memorize them. Haven't had a chance to check out the sims yet, but supposedly they're harder and feel more like the actual exam. One feature I can't stand about his mcq is that the answer explanation opens up in a window on the screen and you have to keep closing it to look at the actual question. I wish there was a split screen like Ninja. As far as difficulty, I feel Ninja is harder, but it's good to use Roger as you first go through the material and then switch to Ninja for your review.

    "Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity."

    Roger & Ninja

    FAR: 75
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, 73, 82
    REG: 68, 82

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #781936
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Rogers questions have gotten much harder..to the point ive been ready to break shit..lol

    I was going to go back and reviews the old questions a second time through and decided to do the new ones instead..and that was a punch to the gut..

    He does has some terrible questions on there that seem more apt to trick you as opposed to actually be solveable..Ive come across several that he never covered or were never covered in any class..as wellas multiple that simply dont make sense or have answers that are pretty much exactly the same..

    So I hope the exam isnt actually that way

    #781937
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    as far as scoring goes on them.im scoring higher on the new ones then the old..but then again ive been stuck studying for far for 6 months thanks to nasba

    #781938
    Duskfall
    Participant

    They are much harder…in fact I see the same ones as in NINJA MCQ quite often. Ninja MCQ are still more challenging overall though.

    • FAR - 81 - JUN 7th, 2016
    • BEC - 85 - AUG 23rd, 2016
    • AUD- 80 - OCT 5th, 2016
    • REG- 77 - DEC 2nd, 2016

     

    FAR - 07/07/2016 - 81
    BEC - 08/23/2016
    AUD - 10/05/2016
    REG - 11/23/2016

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.