- This topic has 9 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 10 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
As you all may know, there is a general consensus that the UWorld Roger CPA Review MCQ test bank is vastly inferior compared some of his competitors.
I’m wondering why this would be the case if he’s “raised the bar” when it comes to his materials. I would assume that someone on the development team scours the internet for comments and acknowledges the fact that most candidates feel as if his test bank is not that great.
I’ll be taking BEC on Wednesday on a Hail Mary attempt and primarily used his test bank and agree that most of it was not as difficult as the 500 or so NINJA MCQs, but they weren’t over the top easy.
Perhaps it won’t be enough, and I’ve accepted that, but I’m curious to know if anyone who has used primarily Roger’s test bank for exams taken in this window can comment on the difficulty of the exam as compared to his test bank.
-Turbo
"FACT": The odds of consecutively passing all four sections of the CPA exam on the first try: 7%.Me: Hold my beer...
FAR (April 2017): 75+
BEC (May 2017): 75+
AUD (July 2017): 75+
REG (September 2017): 75+
Roger + Ninja Audio/MCQ/Notes (BEC & REG)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.