[pfloyd]

Well it seems like the consistency amongst test takers is that Roger and NINJA MCQ’s is that they don’t prepare you enough for BEC. If I fail tomorrow what the hell should I use for the next attempt lol, Gleim, or Wiley?

AUD - 86
BEC - 89
FAR - 75
REG - 79

B#### Don't Kill My Vibe

AUD 5/27/16 74 &#%!! 7/13/2016 86!
BEC 8/17/2016
FAR 11/04/2015 73, 1/4/2016 75 (phew!)
REG 2/26/2016 74. 4/2/2016 79

[Ryan]

all review courses are the same. If you are prepared, you won half the battle. The next half is pure luck, whether you get a fair exam that tests your knowledge, or a ridiculous IT exam like many of us got.

AUD - 93
BEC - 85
FAR - 85
REG - 85

 

[ultrarunner]

Everybody is different. I passed BEC on my first try by studying Roger full lecture and MCQs. I studied less than 2 months while working full-time. I didn't have time for CRAM, so I skipped it. BEC is the section that people with good accounting background often struggle. I have no accounting background but have a decent math background. I believe that helped a lot.

CPA/ MST/ Roger CPA Review

FAR 72,67,79 (Roger+Wiley test bank)11/15
AUD 80 (Roger)10/15
BEC 80 (Roger)4/16
REG 63,78 (Roger+Ninja MCQs)5/16

[mtaylo24]

Gleim is pretty good. In my opinion, Ninja wasnt too good as a prep, Its good as a final review tool after going through your prep. I say this because of the way things are organized. You get Econ questions in the cost/finance sections, IT questions in pretty much any chapter. Maybe something that can be saved for the last 2/3 weeks, if you have that much time for final review.

CPA (2017)

REG:  75

BEC:  76

FAR:  77

AUD: 78

 

CMA (2019)

P1: 380

P2: 360

AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)

[Author]

Replies