Gleim BEC final 3 subunits–sucks rant post

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1658495
    nalratoss
    Participant

    Gleim Question –

    Cost fundamentals, costing methods and variance analysis.

    No idea how long it’s gonna take

    Spent an entire day on SU 18 costing fundamentals.

    Looks like I can’t finish the book within 2 more days 🙁

    The reason it’s hard, is that the language gets more and more technical. Memorizing a bunch of equations and to play the calculator like a toy, SMH.

    FAR-80

    AUD-77

    REG-75

    BEC-82

     

    I'm done done!

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1658498
    cmcook
    Participant

    I have a love/hate relationship with Gleim. Currently have been stuck in one SU for more than I'd like to admit (REG).

    I remember thinking that nothing was worse than Gleim's BEC, but then I scored an 84 and decided I was okay with it 🙂

    I'm trying to remind myself that same rule will apply with REG. I did not actually “complete” 60% of the course when I took it the first time which I think is why I bombed. So that was a nice reminder that although Gleim can really suck, retaking a section sucks more.

    Hang in there! We'll make it.

    Death before surrender
    #1658834
    Williams
    Participant

    Yeah Gleim's review material is absolutely brutal. Their Spartan training will pay off if you stick to the end. I couldn't unfortunately and skipped the last two SUs for BEC Gleim. Took the test three weeks ago and I didn't feel it hurt me that bad. Definitely got MCQs from those units but just made educated guesses. Make sure you know COSO like the back of your hand before spending time on those units, if you don't then your time will be much better spent mastering COSO.

    AUD - 77
    BEC - 86
    FAR - 76
    REG - NINJA in Training
    AUD-77

    BEC-74,86

    FAR-74,76

    REG-Q3 Score Pending

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.