FIFO Completed units: Becker CPA Review example vs question

  • This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Anonymous.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #200471
    jlee1086
    Participant

    In their example, Becker gives 3 components to FIFO

    1. WIP Beginning: 100 * 75%= 75
    2. Completed – beginning inventory= 600 – 100= 500
    3. WIP Ending: 100 * 75%= 75

    But this problem is has something the lectures don’t prepare you for.

    Kimbeth Manufacturing uses a process cost system to manufacture Dust Density Sensors for the mining industry. The following information pertains to operations for the month of May 2012:

    Beginning work in process inventory, May 1 16,000
    Started in production during May 100,000
    Completed production during May 92,000
    Ending work in process inventory, May 31 24,000

    The beginning inventory was 60% complete for materials and 20% complete for conversion costs. The ending inventory was 90% complete for materials and 40% complete for conversion costs.

    Here is the answer explanation:

    Completed units 92,000
    Plus: Equivalent units in ending inventory (24,000
    × 90%) 21,600
    Less: Equivalent units in beginning inventory
    (16,000 × 60%)
    (9,600)
    Equivalent units of production 104,000

    Why don’t you take 100% of beginning inventory out of completed units like you do in the example? If it’s because you do it to WIP and not inventory, Becker didn’t make a single peep about that

     
    “ninja-cpa-review”/
     

    FAR 57 (11/2014), 64 (1/2015), 79 (7/2015)
    AUD 68 (2/2015), 79 (11/2015)
    REG 79 (1/2016)
    BEC 81 (4/2016)

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #760121
    Biff-1955-Tannen
    Participant

    I'm not sure why the example has it like that.
    EDIT: Looking at the example again, I don't think that is saying those are the “completed units”, it seems to me like it is saying “completed – beginning” will equal the units “started and completed” this period. Which is not really relevant for the calculation. I would just ignore that.

    The problem you posted below is the correct way to do it.
    Using FIFO method, it is: Completed units – Beginning WIP Equivalent Units + Ending WIP Equivalent Units.

    Using Weighted Average method is just two components: Completed + Ending WIP Equivalent Units

    AUD - 93
    BEC - 83
    FAR - 83
    REG - 84
    Nobody calls me chicken

    AUD 93 Jan 16
    BEC 83 Feb 16
    FAR 83 Apr 16
    REG 84 May 16

    99% Ninja MCQ only

    #760122
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    My Becker shows the answer calculated like this:

    Beg WIP * (1-%complete)
    +(units complete – beg WIP)
    +(end wip * % complete)

    (Question CPA-03634 is DM)

    16 * (1-.6) = 6.4
    +92-16 = 76
    +(24*.9) = 21.6

    = 104

    (Question CPA-03637 is Conversion Costs)

    16 * (1-.2) = 12.8
    +(92-16) = 76
    +(24*.4) = 9.6
    =
    98.4

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #760123
    jlee1086
    Participant

    I see I forgot to do 1-% for beginning WIP. The Wiley way (from the problem I posted) is so much easier to remember, as there are no unnecessary steps.

    FAR 57 (11/2014), 64 (1/2015), 79 (7/2015)
    AUD 68 (2/2015), 79 (11/2015)
    REG 79 (1/2016)
    BEC 81 (4/2016)

    #760124
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    delete

    #760125
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    delete

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.