[jtshort]

WARNING: This is just pure guessing!

So I think I’ve found a way to possibly tell if you’ve passed a section before score release. If you log in to the NASBA site (must be using Chrome or Firefox) and view your ‘Home’ page as if you were going to resubmit an application. From that screen where your table of previous scores are, right click anywhere and select, ‘View Page Source’. Now go down to where the coding for the bottom table is located (you can do this by pressing Ctrl + ‘F’ and entering in the section abbreviation – i.e. AUD for auditing). Each row in the table is defined with curly brackets and separated by a comma. Within each curly bracket there should be information similar to the following: “id”:”xxx811″,”create_date”:”06 Dec 13″,”update_date”:”16 Feb 14″,”status”:”Submitted”,”description”:”AUD” (ID # redacted). Once you’re at the part of the table that gives you the information pertaining to each section, I think if you have an ID number that means you passed at least one section on that Notice to Schedule. In order to test this, it would be beneficial to have someone who passed two sections on one NTS to confirm whether or not they have two ID numbers in that section of the coding. Also, it would help if someone who did not pass any section of a particular NTS to verify that they have no ID number. Can anyone confirm either of these situations?

AUD - 90
BEC - 85
FAR - 81
REG - 82

[kbCPA]

So I tried to test your theory. I have two sections on my NTS, AUD and REG. I took REG on Jan 30. I have not taken AUD yet. Here is what my code says:

{“id”:”XXXXXX”,”create_date”:”27 Dec 13″,”update_date”:”30 Jan 14″,”status”:”Submitted”,”description”:”AUD,REG”}

So this would mean they don't have my score yet bc the updated date is the date I took the exam? Or does this mean I did not pass 🙁

[kbCPA]

So I tried to test your theory. I have two sections on my NTS, AUD and REG. I took REG on Jan 30. I have not taken AUD yet. Here is what my code says:

{“id”:”XXXXXX”,”create_date”:”27 Dec 13″,”update_date”:”30 Jan 14″,”status”:”Submitted”,”description”:”AUD,REG”}

So this would mean they don't have my score yet bc the updated date is the date I took the exam? Or does this mean I did not pass 🙁

[NYCaccountant]

Wait do you have an ID number? I have an ID number.

FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

[NYCaccountant]

Wait do you have an ID number? I have an ID number.

FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

[kbCPA]

The ‘XXXXXX' I blocked out are an ID number. But the update date is Jan 30, the day I took the exam.

[kbCPA]

The ‘XXXXXX' I blocked out are an ID number. But the update date is Jan 30, the day I took the exam.

[Anonymous]

I'm assuming none of this would apply if you are in a non NASBA state right?

[Anonymous]

I'm assuming none of this would apply if you are in a non NASBA state right?

[Anonymous]

I have an ID# for every NTS I have ever had in that list and have not passed a single test yet.

[Anonymous]

I have an ID# for every NTS I have ever had in that list and have not passed a single test yet.

[FARtogo0114]

@jtshort When did you sit for the exam?

BEC 87
REG 76
AUD 67, 76
FAR 67, 79

DONE!! Feb 2014

[FARtogo0114]

@jtshort When did you sit for the exam?

BEC 87
REG 76
AUD 67, 76
FAR 67, 79

DONE!! Feb 2014

[NYCaccountant]

So the theory is wrong. @Clarissa just proved it.

FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

[NYCaccountant]

So the theory is wrong. @Clarissa just proved it.

FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

[K_Sunshine5]

Just checked mine:

one ID for 2 sections passed on 1 NTS

one ID for 0 sections passed on 1 NTS

It would be awesome if this worked but it doesn't look like it does :(.

Gotta still keep waiting for NASBA to use their batch method to release the scores.

Haven't they gotten the memo that the real time method is the new fad? 😉

FAR: 65, 77!
AUD: 72, 72, 80!
REG: 64, 84!
BEC: 83!
Ethics: 98!

Delaware CPA as of May 23, 2014 at 10:43am EST.

"She believed she could, so she did."

[Author]

Replies