- This topic has 407 replies, 108 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 5 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 5, 2015 at 8:09 pm #192519
jeffKeymasterWelcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for BEC.
Economic Cycles (All Across the Land)https://www.another71.com/economic-cycles-rap/
Posted by Another71 on Thursday, November 6, 2014
Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 11, 2015 at 5:46 pm #683223
jsch8912MemberKarmee Company has been accumulating operating data in order to prepare an annual profit plan. Details regarding Karmee's sales for the first six months of the coming year are as follows.
Estimated Monthly Sales Type of Monthly Sale
January $600,000 Cash sales 20%
February 650,000 Credit sales 80%
March 700,000
April 625,000
May 720,000
June 800,000
Collection Pattern for Credit Sales
Month of sale 30%
One month following sale 40%
Second month following sale 25%
Karmee's cost of goods sold average 40 percent of the sales value. Karmee's objective is to maintain a target inventory equal to 30 percent of the next month's sales. Purchases of merchandise for resale are paid for in the month following the sale. The variable operating expenses (other than cost of goods sold) for Karmee are 10 percent of sales and are paid for in the month following the sale. The annual fixed operating expenses are presented below. All of these are incurred uniformly throughout the year and paid monthly except for insurance and property taxes. Insurance is paid quarterly in
January, April, July, and October. Property taxes are paid twice a year in April and October.
Annual Fixed Operating Costs
Advertising $720,000
Depreciation 420,000
Insurance 180,000
Property taxes 240,000
Salaries 1,080,000
The purchases of merchandise that Karmee Company will need to make during February will be:
a. $266,000
b. $254,000
c. $275,000
d. $260,000
I got C but the answer is A. The beginning inventory they multiplied the 650,000 X 40% X 30% = 78,000 why would you multiply the 40%
May 11, 2015 at 9:12 pm #683224
AnonymousInactiveI got to answer A with the following steps:
I took February's sales total and multiplied it by the cost of goods sold which is 40%.
Then I multiplied the COGS total for February by (1-.30) because January's purchases should have included 30% of the inventory needed for February's sales.
Next I calculated how much target inventory we need to maintain going into March. So take March's estimated monthly sales and multiply that by the 40% COGS percentage (because you are just worried about your inventory cost) and take that total and multiply it by the 30% target inventory percentage.
Feb: $650,000 x 40% = $260,000 then 260,000 x (1-.30) = 182,000
March: $700,000 x 40% = 280,000 then 280,000 x 30% = 84,000
182,000+84,000 = $266,000 cost of inventory to buy during February
Hope this helps!
May 11, 2015 at 11:37 pm #683225
jsch8912MemberThank you @dgilbreath
May 12, 2015 at 12:54 am #683226
Tscape16ParticipantWho is ready for this? My exam is Friday and on my first Becker final I got a 79%. Been dropping progress tests like crazy and averaging 80-90%. Taking test two on Wednesday for one final push!
FAR - 90 ✔
BEC - 86 ✔
REG - 82 ✔
AUD - 92 ✔
ETHICS - Passed*Licensed CPA
May 12, 2015 at 1:06 am #683227
shanek327ParticipantSee below…my answer is B, but they say it should be C…can anyone explain?
Mo' Joe Coffee Houses has noticed that its contribution margin is shrinking and is analyzing the direct materials used in its operations for price and usage components. The company purchased 30,000 pounds of coffee for $112,500. Based on its sales, the company estimates that only 26,000 pounds of coffee should have been used, however, 28,000 were actually used. The standard cost per pound was budgeted at $3.10. In computing its two-way direct material variances, Mo' Joe determines the following components are either favorable or unfavorable:
Price
Quantity (Usage)
a.
($25,700)
($12,500)
b.
($19,500)
$6,200
c.
($19,500)
($6,200)
d.
($19,500)
($12,500)
FAR - 75
AUD - 78
BEC - 82
REG - 772 Corinthians 5:21
Our value does not come from our skills and abilities, as good as they may be; it does not come from our GPA, our job, a promotion from that job to a better job, our success on the CPA exam, or anything of the like; but our value comes from the fact that we have a Creator who loves us, cares for us, and desires to help us navigate the rough waters of this life in a way that provides security, hope, and true, everlasting joy while we anticipate the life to come, with Him.
May 12, 2015 at 2:24 pm #683228
Tscape16ParticipantSo the question is asking you to give the price and usage (volume) variance.
I'll skip the price variance since you have that down. The usage variance is due to the fact they used 28,000 instead of the 26,000 they should have used per estimates (aka standards). That equates to 2,000 more than standard, which should elimate one answer since it is unfavorable. 2,000 pounds times the standard price, $3.10, is $6,200, (unfavorable).
FAR - 90 ✔
BEC - 86 ✔
REG - 82 ✔
AUD - 92 ✔
ETHICS - Passed*Licensed CPA
May 12, 2015 at 3:17 pm #683229
shanek327Participantyes I agree with 6,200 and I agree it's unfavorable. my confusion came from the fact that when doing the calculation you get a positive 6,200, the correct answer though is C. which shows a negative 6,200.
should an unfavorable variance always be displayed as a negative?
FAR - 75
AUD - 78
BEC - 82
REG - 772 Corinthians 5:21
Our value does not come from our skills and abilities, as good as they may be; it does not come from our GPA, our job, a promotion from that job to a better job, our success on the CPA exam, or anything of the like; but our value comes from the fact that we have a Creator who loves us, cares for us, and desires to help us navigate the rough waters of this life in a way that provides security, hope, and true, everlasting joy while we anticipate the life to come, with Him.
May 12, 2015 at 3:22 pm #683230
Tscape16ParticipantYes, I would think of this this way: An unfavorable result is a negative result (because you don't want it to be unfavorable). You first answer was also unfavorable and you chose negative. That should help lead you to the correct response as well.
FAR - 90 ✔
BEC - 86 ✔
REG - 82 ✔
AUD - 92 ✔
ETHICS - Passed*Licensed CPA
May 12, 2015 at 4:26 pm #683231
shanek327Participantthanks!
FAR - 75
AUD - 78
BEC - 82
REG - 772 Corinthians 5:21
Our value does not come from our skills and abilities, as good as they may be; it does not come from our GPA, our job, a promotion from that job to a better job, our success on the CPA exam, or anything of the like; but our value comes from the fact that we have a Creator who loves us, cares for us, and desires to help us navigate the rough waters of this life in a way that provides security, hope, and true, everlasting joy while we anticipate the life to come, with Him.
May 12, 2015 at 7:09 pm #683232
wonderingstudentMemberCan you guys help me answer this question?
Central Winery manufactured two products, A and B. Estimated demand for product A was 10,000 bottles and for product B was 30,000 bottles. The estimated sales price per bottle for A was $6.00 and for B was $8.00. Actual demand for product A was 8,000 bottles and for product B was 33,000 bottles. The actual price per bottle for A was $6.20 and for B was $7.70. What amount would be the total selling price variance for Central Winery?
$3,700 unfavorable.
$8,300 unfavorable. Correct
$3,700 favorable.
$14,100 favorable.
This answer is correct because the selling price variance is equal to actual sales multiplied by the difference between actual sales price and standard sales price. Therefore the variance is equal to $8,300 unfavorable [(8,000 × ($6.20 − $6.00)] + [33,000 × ($7.70 − $8.00)].
I thought if you had a lower price the variance would be favorable?
May 12, 2015 at 7:51 pm #683233
Tscape16ParticipantYour assumption is correct, if the question asked about expenses (IE: Materials, Labor, VOH/FOH, etc). This question is talking about selling price variances, so your revenue. A smaller number is unfavorable in this situation.
FAR - 90 ✔
BEC - 86 ✔
REG - 82 ✔
AUD - 92 ✔
ETHICS - Passed*Licensed CPA
May 12, 2015 at 9:18 pm #683234
TroblinParticipantHmn… now I’m confused. Beckers variance review stresses that if Actual > Applied/Estimated, then you have an unfavorable variance.
So if the variance deals with Rate or Price, the opposite is true?
FAR: 85(11/22/2014) - Becker(full)/Ninja MCQ (5 day cram)
AUD: 79 (2/1/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja Notes
REG: 84(4/19/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja Notes
BEC: 83 (7/13/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja NotesDate I Got My Life Back!: 8/4/2015 🙂
May 12, 2015 at 10:50 pm #683235
Tscape16ParticipantLet me explain it this way: It breaks down to would you rather sell your product for $10 or $5? Versus would you rather have product costs of $10 or $5? Your answer is different, correct?
FAR - 90 ✔
BEC - 86 ✔
REG - 82 ✔
AUD - 92 ✔
ETHICS - Passed*Licensed CPA
May 13, 2015 at 12:10 am #683236
wonderingstudentMemberThank you, Tscape16!
May 13, 2015 at 12:31 am #683237
Tscape16ParticipantNo problem-o. Helping answer questions helps solidify my knowledge and my test date is soon approaching.
FAR - 90 ✔
BEC - 86 ✔
REG - 82 ✔
AUD - 92 ✔
ETHICS - Passed*Licensed CPA
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 19’ is closed to new replies.
