BEC Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 43

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 1,073 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #655709
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Is there anything i need to know before BEC tom.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #655710
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Pleeease someone help clarify, I get these wrong over and over again =(

    Overhead question. Wiley has a problem that notes:

    Budgeted cost driver activity levels for DL hrs and DL costs were 20,000 and $100,000 respectively.

    In addition, budgeted variable and fixed factory overhead were $50,000 and $25,000 respectively.

    Actual costs and hours were DL hrs 21,000, DL costs $110,000, Machine hours 35,000

    For a particular job 1,500 DL hrs were used. Using DL hrs as the driver what amount should be applied to overhead for this job.

    Answer 5,625 by taking the variable and fixed factory overhead were $50,000 and $25,000 respectively and dividing it by the budgeted 20,000 hours x 1,500 job.

    Why isn't the overhead rate found by taking $100,000 budgeted costs for DL hours divided by 20,000 budgeted hours?

    In other words, how do you tell if you're supposed to use the variable and fixed factory overhead amounts vs the budgeted costs for the driver?

    #655711
    mtwst113
    Member

    @Cricket, can you post the entire problem word for word, if it isn't already? These problems can be tricky without the right context.

    BEC | √
    AUD| √
    FAR| Spring 2015

    #655712
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mtwst113 Totally! Thank you for your time:

    Jonathan Mfg. adopted a job-costing system. For the current year, budgeted cost driver activity levels for direct labor hours and direct labor costs were 20,000 and $100,000, respectively. In addition, budgeted variable and fixed factory overhead were $50,000 and $25,000, respectively. Actual costs and hours for the year were as follows:

    Direct labor hours 21,000

    Direct labor costs $110,000

    Machine hours 35,000

    For a particular job, 1,500 direct labor hours were used. Using direct labor hours as the cost driver, what amount of overhead should be applied to this job?

    Answer $5,625

    #655713
    needhelpnow
    Member

    I'm sure many of you are studying hard, but I just wanted to say that after studying cost, variances to be specific for a week straight….i hate it, and still don't get it completely..

    #655714
    mtwst113
    Member

    This question might trick you into thinking that the $100,000 represents overhead which would lead you to use it as your numerator. It is a “distractor” number. Total manufacturing overhead is Variable + Fixed overhead, which is the 50,000 + 25,000 here.

    Hope this helps, and be careful!

    BEC | √
    AUD| √
    FAR| Spring 2015

    #655715
    needhelpnow
    Member

    @Cricket

    I can't explain why, but here is the formula I have been using from Roger:

    The amount of over/underapplied overhead (O/H) is computed as follows:

    Applied O/H = Predetermined O/H rate X Actual production hours

    Predetermined O/H rate = Estimated O/H costs / Estimated Direct Machine Hours (Plug this in the above formula, and you will have your answer)

    #655716
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Took BEC today. Do not take this lightly unless you wanna take it again on Q2. I had decent amount of COSO, IT and variances. Few conceptual/theoretical questions. majority were computations and I knew I bombed it. I didn't notice if the testlet went harder. I BSed the WC. I didn't know the topic that was asked but I answered like I knew it even though it might be out of the context. WT* right? Best of luck to everyone taking BEC this Q1. ^_^

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #655717
    Mdeganis
    Participant

    Took BEC today as well. The questions were all over the board. Definitely wish i was stronger with the different types of bonds and risks associated with them. Not as many questions on econ or actual computation like I hoped for, but I felt very comfortable with computing variances and other formulas, which ninja mcq really helped with. I didn't leave enough time for the writing portion which sucked, but my own fault. All three of them were space shots – so i just made sure my writing was clear and flowed without any grammar errors. Which section should i start next? FAR or REG?

    BEC - 80
    REG - 77
    AUD - 7/14
    FAR - 8/30

    #655718
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm working on REG now. If you go that route, start with the Business Law and Ethics portions. Then do the tax. For Becker start with R5 – R8 and then go back to do R1 – R4.

    FAR is a beast. It really is. But now might be a good time to start it since you've got a couple of months to study for it before a testing window opens again (you won't get through either section by Feb 28).

    #655719
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It also sounds like the majority of people taking BEC in January had very concept heavy exams. Those of us taking it in February are getting very calculation heavy exams.

    #655720
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    Can someone help me understand why the difference is $20k instead of $45k? Sorry but the comment doesn't keep any formatting, so it will be a bit messy.

    Augusta, Inc., expects manufacturing and sales of 70,000 units of product Maggie, its only product, to occur evenly over a 10-week period. Augusta pays for materials in the week following use. The balance of accounts payable for materials at the beginning of the 10-week period is $40,000. There are no beginning inventories. The fol­lowing information pertains to product Maggie for the 10-week period:

    Sales price $11 per unit

    Materials $3 per unit

    Manufacturing conversion costs—Fixed $210,000

    Variable $2 per unit

    Selling and administrative costs—Fixed $45,000

    Variable $1 per unit

    Actual results are as budgeted, except that 60,000 of the 70,000 units produced were sold. Using absorp­tion costing, what is the difference between the reported income and the budgeted net income?

    Answer:

    Unit sales 60,000 70,000

    Revenue $660,000 $770,000

    Less COGS 480,000 560,000

    Gross profit $180,000 $210,000

    Less Fixed selling/admn. 45,000 45,000

    Less Variable selling/admn. 60,000 70,000



    Net profit $ 75,000 $ 95,000

    The difference is pre-tax net income of $20,000 ($95,000 − $75,000).

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

    #655721
    Pracpa
    Member

    Pl let me know when u compare us treasury bills and bonds, what risk will you analyse

    #655722
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @CPA2B — I came up with $20k difference. Not sure what you calculated to get another answer. Can you show your work?

    #655723
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    Budget Actual

    Sales 770,000 660,000

    DM 210,000 180,000

    Var O/H 140,000 120,000

    Fixed O/H 210,000 210,000

    =COGS 560,000 510,000

    Var SG&A 70,000 60,000

    Fixed SG&A 45,000 45,000

    Net Income 95,000 45,000

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 1,073 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 43’ is closed to new replies.