- This topic has 1,073 replies, 109 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
No_one.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 20, 2014 at 6:25 pm #190227
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 9, 2015 at 1:33 am #655709
Future NinjaParticipantIs there anything i need to know before BEC tom.
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,February 9, 2015 at 3:37 am #655710
AnonymousInactivePleeease someone help clarify, I get these wrong over and over again =(
Overhead question. Wiley has a problem that notes:
Budgeted cost driver activity levels for DL hrs and DL costs were 20,000 and $100,000 respectively.
In addition, budgeted variable and fixed factory overhead were $50,000 and $25,000 respectively.
Actual costs and hours were DL hrs 21,000, DL costs $110,000, Machine hours 35,000
For a particular job 1,500 DL hrs were used. Using DL hrs as the driver what amount should be applied to overhead for this job.
Answer 5,625 by taking the variable and fixed factory overhead were $50,000 and $25,000 respectively and dividing it by the budgeted 20,000 hours x 1,500 job.
Why isn't the overhead rate found by taking $100,000 budgeted costs for DL hours divided by 20,000 budgeted hours?
In other words, how do you tell if you're supposed to use the variable and fixed factory overhead amounts vs the budgeted costs for the driver?
February 9, 2015 at 4:36 am #655711
mtwst113Member@Cricket, can you post the entire problem word for word, if it isn't already? These problems can be tricky without the right context.
BEC | √
AUD| √
FAR| Spring 2015February 9, 2015 at 4:43 am #655712
AnonymousInactive@mtwst113 Totally! Thank you for your time:
Jonathan Mfg. adopted a job-costing system. For the current year, budgeted cost driver activity levels for direct labor hours and direct labor costs were 20,000 and $100,000, respectively. In addition, budgeted variable and fixed factory overhead were $50,000 and $25,000, respectively. Actual costs and hours for the year were as follows:
Direct labor hours 21,000
Direct labor costs $110,000
Machine hours 35,000
For a particular job, 1,500 direct labor hours were used. Using direct labor hours as the cost driver, what amount of overhead should be applied to this job?
Answer $5,625
February 9, 2015 at 5:20 am #655713
needhelpnowMemberI'm sure many of you are studying hard, but I just wanted to say that after studying cost, variances to be specific for a week straight….i hate it, and still don't get it completely..
February 9, 2015 at 5:38 am #655714
mtwst113MemberThis question might trick you into thinking that the $100,000 represents overhead which would lead you to use it as your numerator. It is a “distractor” number. Total manufacturing overhead is Variable + Fixed overhead, which is the 50,000 + 25,000 here.
Hope this helps, and be careful!
BEC | √
AUD| √
FAR| Spring 2015February 9, 2015 at 5:39 am #655715
needhelpnowMember@Cricket
I can't explain why, but here is the formula I have been using from Roger:
The amount of over/underapplied overhead (O/H) is computed as follows:
Applied O/H = Predetermined O/H rate X Actual production hours
Predetermined O/H rate = Estimated O/H costs / Estimated Direct Machine Hours (Plug this in the above formula, and you will have your answer)
February 9, 2015 at 10:32 pm #655716
Future NinjaParticipantTook BEC today. Do not take this lightly unless you wanna take it again on Q2. I had decent amount of COSO, IT and variances. Few conceptual/theoretical questions. majority were computations and I knew I bombed it. I didn't notice if the testlet went harder. I BSed the WC. I didn't know the topic that was asked but I answered like I knew it even though it might be out of the context. WT* right? Best of luck to everyone taking BEC this Q1. ^_^
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,February 10, 2015 at 12:13 am #655717
MdeganisParticipantTook BEC today as well. The questions were all over the board. Definitely wish i was stronger with the different types of bonds and risks associated with them. Not as many questions on econ or actual computation like I hoped for, but I felt very comfortable with computing variances and other formulas, which ninja mcq really helped with. I didn't leave enough time for the writing portion which sucked, but my own fault. All three of them were space shots – so i just made sure my writing was clear and flowed without any grammar errors. Which section should i start next? FAR or REG?
BEC - 80
REG - 77
AUD - 7/14
FAR - 8/30February 10, 2015 at 12:44 am #655718
AnonymousInactiveI'm working on REG now. If you go that route, start with the Business Law and Ethics portions. Then do the tax. For Becker start with R5 – R8 and then go back to do R1 – R4.
FAR is a beast. It really is. But now might be a good time to start it since you've got a couple of months to study for it before a testing window opens again (you won't get through either section by Feb 28).
February 10, 2015 at 12:45 am #655719
AnonymousInactiveIt also sounds like the majority of people taking BEC in January had very concept heavy exams. Those of us taking it in February are getting very calculation heavy exams.
February 10, 2015 at 3:59 pm #655720
CPA2B_NJMemberCan someone help me understand why the difference is $20k instead of $45k? Sorry but the comment doesn't keep any formatting, so it will be a bit messy.
Augusta, Inc., expects manufacturing and sales of 70,000 units of product Maggie, its only product, to occur evenly over a 10-week period. Augusta pays for materials in the week following use. The balance of accounts payable for materials at the beginning of the 10-week period is $40,000. There are no beginning inventories. The following information pertains to product Maggie for the 10-week period:
Sales price $11 per unit
Materials $3 per unit
Manufacturing conversion costs—Fixed $210,000
Variable $2 per unit
Selling and administrative costs—Fixed $45,000
Variable $1 per unit
Actual results are as budgeted, except that 60,000 of the 70,000 units produced were sold. Using absorption costing, what is the difference between the reported income and the budgeted net income?
Answer:
Unit sales 60,000 70,000
Revenue $660,000 $770,000
Less COGS 480,000 560,000
Gross profit $180,000 $210,000
Less Fixed selling/admn. 45,000 45,000
Less Variable selling/admn. 60,000 70,000
Net profit $ 75,000 $ 95,000
The difference is pre-tax net income of $20,000 ($95,000 − $75,000).
FAR - 50, 78
BEC - 67, 72, 75
AUD - 72, 80
REG - 70, 85To God be the glory! Forever, amen!
NJ License
February 10, 2015 at 4:36 pm #655721
PracpaMemberPl let me know when u compare us treasury bills and bonds, what risk will you analyse
February 10, 2015 at 6:15 pm #655722
AnonymousInactive@CPA2B — I came up with $20k difference. Not sure what you calculated to get another answer. Can you show your work?
February 10, 2015 at 7:00 pm #655723
CPA2B_NJMemberBudget Actual
Sales 770,000 660,000
DM 210,000 180,000
Var O/H 140,000 120,000
Fixed O/H 210,000 210,000
=COGS 560,000 510,000
Var SG&A 70,000 60,000
Fixed SG&A 45,000 45,000
Net Income 95,000 45,000
FAR - 50, 78
BEC - 67, 72, 75
AUD - 72, 80
REG - 70, 85To God be the glory! Forever, amen!
NJ License
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 43’ is closed to new replies.
