BEC Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 35

Viewing 15 replies - 511 through 525 (of 1,073 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #655587
    jeff
    Keymaster
    #655588
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone look at this? They say the answer is C but I am pretty sure it is A.

    A job order cost system uses a predetermined factory overhead rate based on expected volume and expected fixed cost. At the end of the year, underapplied overhead might be explained by which of the following situations?

    A.Actual volume, greater than expected; Actual fixed costs, greater than expected

    B.Actual volume, greater than expected; Actual fixed costs, less than expected

    C.Actual volume, less than expected; Actual fixed costs, greater than expected

    D.Actual volume, less than expected; Actual fixed costs, less than expected

    Heres the explanation:

    Underapplied overhead means the actual overhead cost was more than the overhead applied to work-in-process.

    A lower production volume than planned could cause this, since the predetermined overhead application rate per unit would apply overhead for fewer units than planned, resulting in underapplied fixed overhead. This is actual production volume less than the expected production volume.

    Underapplied overhead could also be caused by spending more for overhead than budgeted. This would be the situation where actual fixed costs are greater than the budgeted fixed costs.

    My thinking:

    A lower production volume would cause it to be over applied because not as much of the overhead is used if production is lower.

    What am I missing here?

    #655589
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have another question:

    Under Pick Co.’s job order costing system, manufacturing overhead is applied to work in process using a predetermined annual overhead rate. During January, Pick’s transactions included the following:

    Direct materials issued to production $ 90,000

    Indirect materials issued to production 8,000

    Manufacturing overhead incurred 125,000

    Manufacturing overhead applied 113,000

    Direct labor costs 107,000

    Pick had neither beginning nor ending work-in-process inventory. What was the cost of jobs completed in January?

    A. $302,000

    B. $310,000

    C.$322,000

    D. $330,000

    They say the answer is B. I thought it was C. Why are they using the Manufacturing overhead applied number instead of Manufacturing overhead incurred? Manufacturing overhead incurred is the actual amount incurred so wouldnt the cost of the job be what was actually incurred instead of what was just applied?

    #655590
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Angelwatch, I summon thee!

    #655591
    ron10590
    Member

    This question is a bit confusing:

    Which of the following activities most likely would detect whether payroll data were altered during processing?

    A. Moniter authorized distribution of data control sheets

    B. use test data to verify the performance of edit routines

    C. Examine source documents for approval by supervisors

    D. Segregate duties between approval of hardware and software specifications.

    Answer: B

    This sounds like it would only test if the test data is altered… not the previous actual data. I suppose it's the only answer that tests the data entry clerk's performance… does anyone have a better explanation?

    REG (7/14): 82
    FAR (11/14): 81
    BEC (1/15): 83
    AUD (5/15):

    #655592
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @dsch9319 I might've had one of the harder exams, but knowing the formulas is key for BEC. Otherwise, you will lose time, which is the main reason I am retaking this exam. And, I am trying to get back focus, but it's so hard. Good luck to you.

    #655593
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Ron10590: My first thoughts are that we need to compare docs and if there is a difference, then perform an audit trail and review what has been changed. This makes sense then that we are using test data to see if the entries are valid. Does that help?

    #655594
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    who are studying today? quizzes anyone?

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #655595
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    I got one:

    The sales volume variance is?

    a. the difference between actual and master budget sales volume times actual unit CM

    b. the difference between flexible budget and actual sales volume times master budget unit CM

    c. the difference between flexible budget and master budget sales volume times actual unit CM

    d. the difference between flexible budget and master budget sales volume times master budget unit CM

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #655596
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just registered to sit next month, so I'm starting my BEC studies today….Future, you're not the only one studying today!

    #655597
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    cprv19:

    The reason that you don't use incurred costs is because you, typically, won't know them until the end of the year. It's not a concept that seems to be covered on the CPA Exam but in Cost Accounting you will have a variance between what is incurred and what was applied. So you set standards for overhead and always use those standards to determine the initial cost of goods manufactured. It's not tested but at the end of the year/period, once you know the actual costs of the overhead, you would address the variance between what was applied and what was actually incurred.

    It's one of those really annoying concepts that is counter intuitive until you really think it through.

    Hope that helps and sorry it took me so long to get back to you.

    #655598
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yea I understand what your saying. What do you think about the question above that?

    #655599
    waffle_house
    Participant

    Can someone please explain this question to me and why the answer is right:

    Kore Industries is analyzing a capital investment proposal for new equipment to produce a product over the next eight years. The analyst is attempting to determine the appropriate “end-of-life” cash flows for the analysis. At the end of eight years, the equipment must be removed from the plant and will have a net book value of zero, a tax basis of $75,000, a cost to remove of $40,000, and scrap salvage value of $10,000. Kore's effective tax rate is 40%. What is the appropriate “end-of-life” cash flow related to these items that should be used in the analysis?

    A.$27,000

    B.$12,000

    C.$(18,000)

    D.$(30,000)

    The answer is B but I have no idea how they got this number.

    #655600
    ron10590
    Member

    @Kim: I think it's more that the question wants us to select which answer is a best test of controls for data accuracy. The other answers are good controls, but they don't control for data accuracy

    REG (7/14): 82
    FAR (11/14): 81
    BEC (1/15): 83
    AUD (5/15):

    #655601
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Waffle_House: B is correct and here is how you get there.

    Costs to Remove: (40,000)

    Salvage Value: 10,000

    Nets to (30,000)

    Tax Effect: (30,000) X (1 – .40) = (18,000)

    Depreciation beneft: 75,000 X .40 = 30,000

    So you have a positive, after tax, cash flow of 12,000

Viewing 15 replies - 511 through 525 (of 1,073 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 35’ is closed to new replies.