- This topic has 1,544 replies, 138 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by
jeff.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 23, 2013 at 7:52 pm #177707
jeffKeymasterI have a question that I hope you can help me with…. I purchased the Becker CD’s and installed them on my PC. I have taken and passed all but one of the exams (BEC left).. I was checking to see if my software was up to date and noticed an expiration date of November 2013.. Does this mean my software ( downloaded from my CD’s) will no longer work after November….or will it no longer be supported but I can still take practice exams and do study questions etc?
-
AuthorReplies
-
August 26, 2013 at 4:21 am #441946
AnonymousInactiveQ: “Capital investments require balancing risk and return. managers have a responsibility to ensure that the investments that they make in their own firms increase shareholder value. managers have met that responsibility if the return on the capital investment:
A: Exceeds the rate of return associated with the firm's beta factor”
Can s/o pls explain (and what is a beta factor???)
August 26, 2013 at 4:21 am #442017
AnonymousInactiveQ: “Capital investments require balancing risk and return. managers have a responsibility to ensure that the investments that they make in their own firms increase shareholder value. managers have met that responsibility if the return on the capital investment:
A: Exceeds the rate of return associated with the firm's beta factor”
Can s/o pls explain (and what is a beta factor???)
August 26, 2013 at 12:57 pm #441948
lawlypopMember@determined1
The beta factor is the amount of risk associated with an investment. Investors (hopefully) look at the beta factor of a stock prior to investing. The higher the beta, the higher the risk. The higher the risk, the more reward the shareholder should receive given they took a larger risk. So, theoretically, a shareholder expects at least the return “associated” with the beta of the stock they invested in. Think of it as, say a beta of 1.1 generally yields (making these number up) an 8% return. If you invest in a stock with a beta of 3.2, generally it yields 13% (again, made up numbers). Therefore, shareholder expect to be rewarded with the risk they take on with at least 13%. Hope this helps?
AUD: 84 02/22/13
REG: 84 05/03/13
FAR: 84 07/12/13
BEC: ? 08/30/13Yaeger CPA Review
August 26, 2013 at 12:57 pm #442019
lawlypopMember@determined1
The beta factor is the amount of risk associated with an investment. Investors (hopefully) look at the beta factor of a stock prior to investing. The higher the beta, the higher the risk. The higher the risk, the more reward the shareholder should receive given they took a larger risk. So, theoretically, a shareholder expects at least the return “associated” with the beta of the stock they invested in. Think of it as, say a beta of 1.1 generally yields (making these number up) an 8% return. If you invest in a stock with a beta of 3.2, generally it yields 13% (again, made up numbers). Therefore, shareholder expect to be rewarded with the risk they take on with at least 13%. Hope this helps?
AUD: 84 02/22/13
REG: 84 05/03/13
FAR: 84 07/12/13
BEC: ? 08/30/13Yaeger CPA Review
August 26, 2013 at 3:24 pm #441950
lawlypopMemberSG&A variable costs are NOT product costs for the sake of a theory question. However, from what I grasp, under the Variable costing method, they are included in the calculation of Contribution Margin.
So, the income statement would look like this:
Sales – Variable Product Costs (DM, DL, MOH) – Variable period costs (SG&A) = CM.
AUD: 84 02/22/13
REG: 84 05/03/13
FAR: 84 07/12/13
BEC: ? 08/30/13Yaeger CPA Review
August 26, 2013 at 3:24 pm #442021
lawlypopMemberSG&A variable costs are NOT product costs for the sake of a theory question. However, from what I grasp, under the Variable costing method, they are included in the calculation of Contribution Margin.
So, the income statement would look like this:
Sales – Variable Product Costs (DM, DL, MOH) – Variable period costs (SG&A) = CM.
AUD: 84 02/22/13
REG: 84 05/03/13
FAR: 84 07/12/13
BEC: ? 08/30/13Yaeger CPA Review
August 26, 2013 at 4:08 pm #441952
MickeywanttopassMemberI was wondering How do you prepare for the writing communication section? Any tips you can provide?
REG - 79
AUD - 84
FAR - 82
BEC - 8/29/13August 26, 2013 at 4:08 pm #442023
MickeywanttopassMemberI was wondering How do you prepare for the writing communication section? Any tips you can provide?
REG - 79
AUD - 84
FAR - 82
BEC - 8/29/13August 26, 2013 at 4:25 pm #441954
ImPuRiTyzMemberYa… I keep getting either 50% or below on WC Problems in CPAExcel..
but I got a 94% on MC Qs…. I would like to raise my WC… I put key words and stay on topic… not sure what it is.
AUD- 96
BEC- 84August 26, 2013 at 4:25 pm #442025
ImPuRiTyzMemberYa… I keep getting either 50% or below on WC Problems in CPAExcel..
but I got a 94% on MC Qs…. I would like to raise my WC… I put key words and stay on topic… not sure what it is.
AUD- 96
BEC- 84August 26, 2013 at 6:03 pm #441956
sugarmagnolia548MemberDo you not include salvage value when calculating depreciation for tax purposes?
This is a Becker question.
The Moore Corporation is considering the acquisition of a new machine. The machine can be purchased for $90,000; it will cost $6,000 to transport to Moore's plant and $9,000 to install. It is estimated that the machine will last 10 years, and it is expected to have an estimated salvage value of $5,000. Over its 10-year life, the machine is expected to produce 2,000 units per year with a selling price of $500 and combined material and labor costs of $450 per unit. Federal tax regulations permit machines of this type to be depreciated using the straight-line method over 5 years with no consideration for salvage value. Moore has a marginal tax rate of 40 percent.
What is the net cash flow for the third year that Moore Corporation should use in a capital budgeting analysis?
a.
$47,400
b.
$68,400
c.
$53,700
d.
$64,200
Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. $68,400 net cash flow for the third year.
$90,000 + 6,000 + 9,000
5 years
=
$105,000 tax
5 years
=
$21,000 tax depreciation
Unit
In year 3:
Qty
Value
Tax Calc
Cash Flow
Cash inflow from sales
(2,000 × $500)
=
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Cash outflow for materials & labor
(2,000 × $450)
=
(900,000)
(900,000)
Cash inflow from operations in year 3
100,000
100,000
Less tax
Depreciation expense
(21,000)
Taxable income
79,000
Marginal tax rate
× 40%
Tax to be paid
$31,600
31,600
Net cash flow in year 3 after taxes
$68,400
Alternate Computation:
Cash flow: 1,000,000 − 900,000 = 100,000 × (1 − .4) =
$60,000
After-tax cash flow
Depreciation tax shield: 21,000 × 40%
8,400
Tax shield
$68,400
After-tax cash flow
August 26, 2013 at 6:03 pm #442027
sugarmagnolia548MemberDo you not include salvage value when calculating depreciation for tax purposes?
This is a Becker question.
The Moore Corporation is considering the acquisition of a new machine. The machine can be purchased for $90,000; it will cost $6,000 to transport to Moore's plant and $9,000 to install. It is estimated that the machine will last 10 years, and it is expected to have an estimated salvage value of $5,000. Over its 10-year life, the machine is expected to produce 2,000 units per year with a selling price of $500 and combined material and labor costs of $450 per unit. Federal tax regulations permit machines of this type to be depreciated using the straight-line method over 5 years with no consideration for salvage value. Moore has a marginal tax rate of 40 percent.
What is the net cash flow for the third year that Moore Corporation should use in a capital budgeting analysis?
a.
$47,400
b.
$68,400
c.
$53,700
d.
$64,200
Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. $68,400 net cash flow for the third year.
$90,000 + 6,000 + 9,000
5 years
=
$105,000 tax
5 years
=
$21,000 tax depreciation
Unit
In year 3:
Qty
Value
Tax Calc
Cash Flow
Cash inflow from sales
(2,000 × $500)
=
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Cash outflow for materials & labor
(2,000 × $450)
=
(900,000)
(900,000)
Cash inflow from operations in year 3
100,000
100,000
Less tax
Depreciation expense
(21,000)
Taxable income
79,000
Marginal tax rate
× 40%
Tax to be paid
$31,600
31,600
Net cash flow in year 3 after taxes
$68,400
Alternate Computation:
Cash flow: 1,000,000 − 900,000 = 100,000 × (1 − .4) =
$60,000
After-tax cash flow
Depreciation tax shield: 21,000 × 40%
8,400
Tax shield
$68,400
After-tax cash flow
August 26, 2013 at 6:04 pm #441960
peetreeMember“Federal tax regulations permit machines of this type to be depreciated using the straight-line method over 5 years with no consideration for salvage value”
It says not to in the question.
FAR 02/21/13 - 95
REG 07/02/13 - 87
AUD 08/02/13 - 94
BEC 08/30/13 - 85
Ethics Exam - 90Illinois candidate awaiting his license
Used Becker Self Study | Ninja Audio | Becker Flash Cards | Ninja Notes | Wiley Test Bank
August 26, 2013 at 6:04 pm #442031
peetreeMember“Federal tax regulations permit machines of this type to be depreciated using the straight-line method over 5 years with no consideration for salvage value”
It says not to in the question.
FAR 02/21/13 - 95
REG 07/02/13 - 87
AUD 08/02/13 - 94
BEC 08/30/13 - 85
Ethics Exam - 90Illinois candidate awaiting his license
Used Becker Self Study | Ninja Audio | Becker Flash Cards | Ninja Notes | Wiley Test Bank
August 26, 2013 at 6:12 pm #441965
Newbe654MemberYou should but the question says not to. “tax regulations permit machines of this type to be depreciated using the straight-line method over 5 years with no consideration for salvage value.”
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘BEC Study Group July August 2013 - Page 93’ is closed to new replies.
