AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 32

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 1,961 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #622316
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @CPAHOPEFUL11 – yeah. I think it should be documented as to who, when and why it was added.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622317
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    for non-issuer = 60 days to add/delete rule. after that we can add but we cannot delete.

    for issuer = 45 days to add/delete rule. after that we can add but we cannot delete.

    unless I'm wrong but that's my understanding. please correct me if I'm wrong.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622318
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, and what are the biggest differences between attestation engagements compared to PCAOB audits?

    #622319
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @cpahopeful11 – Oh, I wanna know that too. can someone else help what are biggest differences between attestation engagements compared to PCAOB audits?

    thanks

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622320
    PasstheCPA7
    Participant

    Hi guys, this may be a stupid question, but, I have always found this confusing. In addition, due to the new Clarified standards, this may have changed, so, it's even more confusing. Basically, the question is on “SAS vs. PCAOB”. What is the difference between these two sets of standards? Do auditors perform under SAS for an issuer or nonissuer? I always thought SAS and PCAOB were for issuers, but, I might be wrong. Anyone feel free to add to this.

    Thanks!

    #622321
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have the 2013 Wiley book, what exactly are the new clarity standards?

    Also, further audit procedures are tests of controls and substantive tests but not risk assessment?

    #622322
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    With respect to a small company’s system of purchasing supplies, an auditor’s primary concern should be to obtain satisfaction that supplies ordered and paid for have been

    A. Requested by and approved by authorized individuals who have no incompatible duties.

    B. Received, counted, and checked to quantities and amounts on purchase orders and invoices.

    C. Properly recorded as assets and systematically amortized over the estimated useful life of the supplies.

    D. Used in the course of business and solely for business purposes during the year under audit.

    #622323
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @cpahopeful11 – B?

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622324
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    normally for a small company purchasing office supplies are expensed outright so C and D are out. It's between A and B now. Between the two, I choose B. But I'm not sure.

    ^_^ what's the answer?

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622325
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You are correct!

    #622326
    mariam almas
    Participant

    @Future Ninja yeah u r right regarding documentation completion date.

    AUD: 81 (Done)
    REG: Currently studying
    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD

    NH

    #622327
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Future Ninja is right about the documentation. Per my notes the 60-day rule you can add “or modify”, but with explanation.

    Document Completion

    Non-issuer = 60 days

    Issuer = 45 days

    Document Retention

    Non-issuer = 5 years

    Issuer = 7 years

    #622328
    mariam almas
    Participant

    @CPAby2015 are u sure about the rotate off the engagement ???

    for issure is every 5 years not 7

    it's important to memorize it, so could anyone please conform it ??

    AUD: 81 (Done)
    REG: Currently studying
    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD

    NH

    #622329
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mariam Edited post to avoid confusion. I'm referring to the number of years for document retention. Longer days shorter years, shorter days longer years.

    #622330
    mariam almas
    Participant

    @CPAby2015 okay i thought ur post was regarding rotate off the engagement

    so to make it clear answer the following question :

    Under the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the lead audit or coordinating partner and the reviewing partner must rotate off the audit:

    a.

    Every three years.

    b.

    Each year.

    c.

    Every seven years.

    d.

    Every five years.

    AUD: 81 (Done)
    REG: Currently studying
    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD

    NH

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 1,961 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 32’ is closed to new replies.