AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 23

Viewing 15 replies - 331 through 345 (of 1,961 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #622181
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Since your test is in two weeks, how do you feel about the evidence portion? I'm really struggling in that area and it is just not clicking.

    #622182
    mariam almas
    Participant

    @CPAHOPEFUL11 For me my foundation is excellent in audit evidence since i was in college (all thnx goes to my professor), it needs more more more practices and understand the purpose behind it . i'm very weak in deciding direct and indirect finance interest that impaired the independence specially when the question includes (auditor's brother in law, best friend, mother …) worry about it.

    how about ur preparation? when ur exam gonna be ??

    AUD: 81 (Done)
    REG: Currently studying
    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD

    NH

    #622183
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Any tips on sampling? Did you memorize the formulas? Which area are you focusing on when it comes to this topic?

    #622184
    mariam almas
    Participant

    @CPAby2015 The relationship between Tolerable rate, sampling risk, risk of incorrect acceptance, deviation rate,……etc with the sampling size is very important. Plus you should be familiar with Attribute sampling and variables sampling. The formulas should be memorized, it easy formulas.

    AUD: 81 (Done)
    REG: Currently studying
    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD

    NH

    #622185
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    My studying is okay but not that great in IC or evidence. It just won't stick to me regardless of how hard I try to get it down.

    My exam is scheduled for the 16 so little over three weeks left.

    #622186
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    are you studying full time? im working full time and im scheduled on the 20th.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622187
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    need help:

    reasonable possibility of a significantly material loss and adequately disclosed in the notes to fs would:

    > issue unmodified opinion?

    > add an EM PAR following the Opinion Paragraph?

    please anyone? Thanks.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622188
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Future Ninja,

    I think the answers of your questions are as following:

    1- issue unmodified opinion? if that significant loss can not be estimated then no adjustment required to be included in FS and YES issue unmodified opinion because they have adequately disclosed that in FS.

    2- add an EM PAR following the Opinion Paragraph? YES

    I would prefer if others also can confirm that 🙂

    #622189
    mariam almas
    Participant

    unmodified opinion with EM following the opinion paragraph because it adequately disclosed in the notes FS (going concern matter)

    if NOT adequately disclosed in this case adverse or qualified opinion

    AUD: 81 (Done)
    REG: Currently studying
    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD

    NH

    #622190
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    the answer in becker is only unmodified opinion. no need for an EoM PAR after opinion. That's why I got confused. The amount plays a significant role if it's estimable or not.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622191
    mariam almas
    Participant

    @Future Ninja so as @CPA never give up said “if that significant loss can NOT be estimated then no adjustment required to be included in FS and YES issue unmodified opinion because they have adequately disclosed that in FS”

    however, if it can be estimated+ adequately disclosed =unmodified opinion with EM

    don't get confused, some AUD topics need to be memorized more than understand

    AUD: 81 (Done)
    REG: Currently studying
    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD

    NH

    #622192
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Thank you Mariam.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622193
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Did you know that:

    Because AT 701 provides guidance specific to attest engagements concerning MD&A presentations,

    a practitioner should NOT perform a compliance attestation engagement under section 601,

    Compliance Attestation, with respect to an MD&A presentation?

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622194
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    I'm reading AT 701 from aicpa site.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #622195
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    did you know that:

    A practitioner may accept an engagement to examine MD&A of a

    public or nonpublic entity, provided the practitioner AUDITS, in accordance with

    GAAS,13 the financial statements for at least the latest period to which the

    MD&A presentation relates.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

Viewing 15 replies - 331 through 345 (of 1,961 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 23’ is closed to new replies.