AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 115

Viewing 15 replies - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 1,961 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #623570
    redrum4me
    Participant

    What other kind of questions did the AL come in handy for?

    AUD - 70, 75
    BEC - 74, 74 grrr
    FAR - TBD
    REG - 79

    #623571
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I didn't find the AL useful at all beyond the research question, HOWEVER, I suspect it depends what your SIM questions are on. Outside of the research questions, I had two, my SIMS were all on FAR topics. To my knowledge JE's aren't covered in the AUD AL. Other people have said they got topics on engagement letters or audit reports the SIM has been helpful as it shows examples, word for word, of what those look like.

    #623572
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    AL was helpful for me on two research problems, and two others. So it accounted for 4/7 of the simulations 100%. Yes, literally I for four answers word to word from the AL feature. I'd recommend everyone take the AICPA sample exam and get a good feel of the AL feature.

    #623573
    plotikkk85
    Member

    Can some explain this one to me:

    An auditor's analytical procedures indicate a lower than expected return on an equity method investment. This situation most likely could have been caused by:

    A.

    an error in recording amortization of the excess of the investor's cost over the investment's underlying book value.

    B.

    the investee's decision to reduce cash dividends declared per share of its common stock.

    C.

    an error in recording the unrealized gain from an increase in the fair value of available-for-sale securities in the income account for trading securities.

    D.

    a substantial fluctuation in the price of the investee's common stock on a national stock exchange.

    A – is correct because – The return on common stockholders' equity is (net income less preferred dividends) divided by the average common stockholder's equity. Reducing the cash dividend of common stock or a fluctuation in the price of the investee's common stock would not affect this ratio.

    English is not my first language…and I just do not get this explanation.

    Return on Equity = (NI – Pref Div)/ Aver common stock. equity….

    Lower ROE (return on equity) will be possible when numerator will go down or denominator will go up.

    and I am not sure what is the next step.

    Thanks

    #623574
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @plotikkk85 This question has already been posted here. You're 1st step is correct, identify which will either reduce the numerator (net income) or increase the denominator (equity). B and D do not affect the equity or income so they can be eliminated. C is incorrectly recording gain which increases net income and A is incorrectly recording amortization expense which decreases net income. So the answer is A.

    #623575
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The way I took it was amortization expense was over stated and that decreased net income.

    #623576
    nysonia
    Participant

    Assessing the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time – is it required for a review engagement?

    Regulation - 1/18/2014 - 91
    BEC - 5/24/2014 - 70

    #623577
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If it comes to the auditor's attention then he should check for adequate disclosures.

    #623578
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Taking audit next Monday. Anyone out there memorize all the ratios? I wasn't going to, but the AICPA practice SIM featured a problem with ratios.

    #623579

    I got away without memorizing Ratio (maybe 1 question- not assuming I passed lol)- but it was a fear

    #623580
    mishitacpa
    Member

    Don't memorize ratios..understand them very well.

    REG-78 Expired; retake 11/26
    AUD-2x74- 10/18 waiting
    BEC- 66, 10/03 waiting
    FAR-Jan '15

    #623581
    ruggercpa2b
    Participant

    I put all the ratios that I needed to learn in a word document, then every night I would rewrite the ratios from memory. I kept a stack of the word document on my nightstand. I did that 2 weeks before my exam and even now for the retake I remember the ratios. You have to learn them because of how they can throw a question at you.

    I raised my score by 17 points but it wasn't enough to pass. Understanding the material is key. I am going to do the same for Journal Entries for my retake of audit coming up as well.

    AUD - 73, 72 retake 7/2/2016
    BEC - 8/20/2016
    REG - TBD
    FAR - TBD

    I am so ready for this nightmare to be over. Been at this way too long.

    #623582
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    based on my experience, I memorized the basic formula and understand the concept of “why”. But I was surprised they gave the formula in the actual exam. I don't know if we will have the same sims set but just be ready in case they will throw at you in different style.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623583
    ijustwant76
    Member

    Anyone know how the Becker chapters map to the Ninja MCQs??!?!?

    #623584
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    I used becker for aud and supplement with ninja. NINJA mcq is a nice tool. example A1 in becker (audit report) = 4-J-1 in Ninja (reports). Just Click Select categories button and you can now choose which topic you want to answer.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

Viewing 15 replies - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 1,961 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 115’ is closed to new replies.