AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 109

Viewing 15 replies - 1,621 through 1,635 (of 1,961 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #623480
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @cpahopeful

    If comparative FS are presented with last year being an audit, and current year being a review, you don't modify any paragraph but add an EOM AFTER the opinion paragraph?

    #YES. A separate paragraph an appropriate description of the responsibility assumed for the financial statements of the prior period. The separate paragraph should indicate (a) that the financial statements of the prior period were audited previously, (b) the date of the previous report, (c) the type

    of opinion expressed previously, (d) if the opinion was other than unmodified,

    the substantive reasons therefor, and (e) that no auditing procedures were performed

    after the date of the previous report.

    General Rule: if previous was an audit and current year is a review or compile (downgrade of service) and previous report is reissued and presented, just report for the current year engagement only.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623481
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @cpahopeful:

    If comparative FS are being presented with the last years opinion being changed from a qualified opinion to an unqualified opinion, then the EOM is BEFORE the opinion paragraph:

    # I think EM Par should be presented after Opinion paragraph. There's nothing that I know of expressing unqualified opinion and the EM Par is presented before Opinion Paragraph. A basis of modification of opinion ( qualified or adverse) is presented BEFORE opinion paragraph.

    Lets wait what others have to say.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623482
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @cpahopeful

    Lastly if OCBOA is used instead of GAAP, the EOM is before the opinion paragraph:

    #Other comprehensive basis of accounting are cash basis, tax, and regulatory basis. I called this CATAR ( sounds like Qatar in middle east because its far away from where I am ( far away from GAAP).

    I think EOM is after opinion paragraph.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623483
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks Ninja!

    #623484
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @cpahopeful

    if comparative FS are presented and predecessor auditor does not agree to reissue the report that had a qualified opinion, what paragraph do you explain the reasons for that opinion? Like is it the intro, or in a separate paragraph?

    # if PA did not reissue report, I would explain the reasons in OTHER MATTER paragraph because the matter is not within the accounts and context of FS.

    Let's wait what other have to say.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623485
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    who are taking aud today? Best of luck to you.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623486
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Tomorrow at 12 30.

    #623487
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Best of luck cpahopeful. mine is on 18th with cpaby2015 I think.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623488
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    let us know your experience.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623489
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just checked a few of my questions in the book, the EOM paragraph is before when opinion changed even if it is unqualified.

    #623490
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    And in the book it says if predecessor auditor did NOT reissue the prior year report which was a qualified opinion, then you still explain reasons in the intro which makes little sense.

    #623491
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    oh yeah? interesting. then I stand corrected. i'll take note of that. however, the EM PAR that I know of is after opinion paragraph. kindly check AU-C 706. now im confused. uh uh..

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623492
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Um, I know CPAby2015 explained to me once, but how do the SOC reports work again?

    #623493
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    I saw the clarified standard: AU-C508.74

    If both years were audited and predecessor auditor whose report is not presented, the successor auditor should

    indicate in the introductory paragraph of his or her report (a) that the financial

    statements of the prior period were audited by another auditor,29 (b) the date

    of his or her report, (c) the type of report issued by the predecessor auditor,

    and (d) if the report was other than a standard report, the substantive reasons

    therefore

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #623494
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Sarbanes Oxley Act?

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

Viewing 15 replies - 1,621 through 1,635 (of 1,961 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 109’ is closed to new replies.