@ jbarwick so existence tests from Account record to source doc. completeness tests from source doc to Account record… but be careful (I hate this stuff) for completeness often ratio analysis is a procedure also for existance for account confirmation sometimes you may use Invoices as the population to test but I guess its always reconsiled to Acct records.. I am going to study this stuff more sucks big time
AUD 69, 92 7/15 Gleim and Ninja test bank
FAR sometime in 10/15 Gleim
BEC not taken
REG not taken
@ jbarwick so existence tests from Account record to source doc. completeness tests from source doc to Account record… but be careful (I hate this stuff) for completeness often ratio analysis is a procedure also for existance for account confirmation sometimes you may use Invoices as the population to test but I guess its always reconsiled to Acct records.. I am going to study this stuff more sucks big time
AUD 69, 92 7/15 Gleim and Ninja test bank
FAR sometime in 10/15 Gleim
BEC not taken
REG not taken
@Trish – Thanks and if you get any other tips for these two let me know! I watched a couple youtube videos and one guy said a method for Completeness and Existence but that didn't work. I am going to listen to that Rutgers lecture but it is an hour.
I went through a run of questions last night and my time has come down and accuracy is up a bit into the 80s which is fine by me. Still working those Becker optional questions for cycles…150+ is crazy but helps reinforce what you may see. I am learning from reading the wrong answers as well because they give you explanations of when to use the wrong answers as well. By wrong I mean, this is occurrence not existence and this is accuracy not cutoff.
Journey Started - January 2015
FAR - 4/2015 - Passed
AUD - 7/2015 - Passed
BEC - 8/2015 - Passed
REG - 11/12/2015 - Passed
did you learn anything or did you just get less confidence? I would prefer to be using that time in study mode to see what I did wrong and learn and therefore picking up more fact nuggets
.