AUD Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 104

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192520
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for AUD.

    World Premier: “Unmodified” (Audit Reports Rap Video) πŸ™‚

    Posted by Another71 on Thursday, November 13, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

Viewing 15 replies - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 1,631 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #669911
    Sam1014
    Member

    okay great thank you!

    #669912
    ladybossxo
    Participant

    @Martin: I took two in the same window. I took AUD first last year in May. When I failed AUD, I thought I'd try it again the next window together with FAR. I passed FAR and failed AUD. I decided to take AUD the next window with REG. I passed REG and failed AUD for the third time. I took BEC beginning of the year together with AUD, and I kept failing AUD. I finally passed AUD this quarter.

    CPA Exams Done.

    #669913
    Martin
    Participant

    Nightmare is over for you. Now you need a hobby πŸ™‚

    Through God all things can happen!

    β€œYou never fail until you stop trying.”
    ― Albert Einstein
    When I was young, I used to admire intelligent people;as I grow older, I admire kind people.
    β€œJust keep swimming, just keep swimming.”

    FAR= 72-84
    Audit= 73-82
    BEC= 74-75
    Reg=77

    #669914
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    A lawyer's response to an auditor's inquiry concerning litigation, claims, and assessments may be limited to matters that are considered individually or collectively material to the client's financial statements. Which parties should reach an understanding on the limits of materiality for this purpose?

    A.

    The board and the client's management

    B.

    The client's audit committee and the lawyer

    C.

    The client's management and the lawyer

    D.

    The lawyer and the auditor

    The correct answer is D.

    Legal counsel's response may be limited to matters that are considered individually or collectively material to the financial statements, provided the entity and auditor have reached an understanding on the meaning and limits of materiality for purposes of this letter and management has communicated such understanding to the legal counsel.

    AU-C 501.A56

    My question|:

    I thought the lawyer didn't have anything to do with materiality and the accounting aspects. I don't understand the explanation.

    #669915
    golfball7773
    Participant

    I just got that question and I think it has something to do with the lawyer's understanding of the industry and client for litigations in the past and present

    FAR: 63, 55, 62
    REG: 65, 77*
    AUD: Fail, 64, 71
    BEC: 72, 74, 81

    *expired

    #669916
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    An auditor may provide an issuer client any of the following nonaudit services without impairing independence and without obtaining the preapproval of the audit committee, except:

    A.

    nonaudit services with revenues in aggregate of less than 5% of the total revenues paid by the issuer to the auditor during the fiscal year in which the nonaudit services are provided.

    B.

    nonaudit services that were promptly brought to the attention of, and approved by, the audit committee prior to the completion of the audit.

    C.

    nonaudit services to perform financial information systems design and implementation.

    D.

    services that the issuer did not recognize as nonaudit services at the time of the engagement.

    You are correct, the answer is C.

    Financial information systems design and implementation to an attestation client would impair independence. In addition, all nonaudit services, except those that fall under the de minimis exception, need to be preapproved by the audit committee.

    The question says nothing about attest , but the explanation does. I guessed, but I'd like to know how I'm supposed to remember this.

    #669917
    Yashy
    Participant

    @DoOver you cannot provide help with internal controls/DIM for a client. This may cause the chance of auditing own work.

    Anyone else, please correct me if I am wrong.

    #669918
    lavendersky
    Member

    Does anyone know how important it is to know the equation for mean-per estimation, ratio estimation, difference estimation for sampling? There isnt a lot of questions that Becker ask about that.

    FAR- PASSED
    AUD- PASSED
    REG- PASSED
    BEC-

    You got to do what you have to do!

    #669919
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    A successor auditor should request the new client to authorize the predecessor auditor to allow a review of the predecessor's:

    A.

    engagement letter.

    B.

    working papers.

    C.

    engagement letter and working papers.

    D.

    None of the answer choices are correct.

    The correct answer is B.

    Before accepting an engagement, a successor auditor is required to, with client permission, make inquiries of the predecessor auditor. The successor auditor should also request that the client authorize the predecessor auditor to allow a review of the predecessor auditor's working papers. It is not necessary to review the engagement letter.

    So I thought Becker said you couldn't/shouldn't see the prior auditors WPs. Ninja says yes you should. Any insight from anyone? I could just be getting burnt/confused at this point.

    Thx.

    #669920
    ruggercpa2b
    Participant

    You are allowed to request to look at their workpapers. However, you have to remember that the workpapers belong to the auditor so they can say no.

    The question you posted about the lawyer determining materiality, I remember earlier on in the year when I was studying for my last audit retake seeing that question posted. I feel like there were a lot of questions surrounding that question and it may have been determined that the answer given may be wrong.

    AUD - 73, 72 retake 7/2/2016
    BEC - 8/20/2016
    REG - TBD
    FAR - TBD

    I am so ready for this nightmare to be over. Been at this way too long.

    #669921
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    -posted twice-

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #669922
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    So who's riding the AUD exam train tomorrow? I'm reviewing ninja notes and doing some mild questions. Taking a look at different types of reports and how they are worded.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #669923
    lavendersky
    Member

    I am taking it tmrw also! I have been doing ques. the whole day. I'm going over the cycles right now. Trying to take a look at the different reports too but not sure if I have enough time. I hope I just pass…really can't look again at all these different reports, opinions, and blah blah blah….

    Good luck to you and anyone who is taking it tmrw!

    FAR- PASSED
    AUD- PASSED
    REG- PASSED
    BEC-

    You got to do what you have to do!

    #669924
    scheng3
    Participant

    If a client of an issuer presents management with a material deficiency and management immediately corrects it with no problem. There is required communication with those charged with government, my question is: does it allow for an unmodified opinion or would it be modified?

    #669925
    jyoung117
    Participant

    @DoOver I think for that question the main thing is that you are designing their system so you would not be independent after doing that?

    For not mentioning the attestation engagement, here is the definition, so it should be implied when talking about independence that it is going to be an attest engagement. Hope this helps!

    An attest engagement is an engagement that requires independence as defined in the AICPA Professional Standards (ET 92.01).

Viewing 15 replies - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 1,631 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 104’ is closed to new replies.