Hey All – Just looking for some confirmation on this answer from Becker AUD materials A-5:
In which case might an auditor of an issuer render a qualified opinion on internal control?
I.When there is a scope limitation.
II.When there is a material weakness in internal control.
a. II only.
b. Neither I nor II.
c. Both I and II.
d. I only.
Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. A scope limitation requires the auditor to disclaim an opinion or withdraw from the engagement, and a material weakness in internal control requires the auditor to issue an adverse opinion. Neither situation would result in a qualified opinion.
Choice “d” is incorrect. A scope limitation requires the auditor to disclaim an opinion or withdraw from the engagement.
Choice “a” is incorrect. A material weakness in internal control requires the auditor to issue an adverse opinion.
Choice “c” is incorrect. A scope limitation requires the auditor to disclaim an opinion or withdraw from the engagement, and a material weakness in internal control requires the auditor to issue an adverse opinion. Neither situation would result in a qualified opinion.
—
I am confused about material weakness point: That material weaknesses require the auditor to issue an adverse opinion. Is this true? Can an unmodified opinion not be issued due to a material weakness in internal control? I was under the impression that material weaknesses in internal control would lead to more substantive testing, but not necessarily require an adverse opinion.
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 80
FAR - Aug 21 Release
AUD - Taking Aug 22!!