[Q3] AUD Study Group 2014 - Page 76

Viewing 15 replies - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,389 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #593279
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No, its when an auditor renders an unmodified opinion on a specific element or single FS but expresses a modified opinion on the full set of FS. They could potentially issue a different opinion for different FS and it wouldn't be piecemeal.

    #593280
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks Amanda_88. I did very well on Final Exam 1, and was kind of shocked at how much weaker my performance was on Final Exam 2. MPC was poor, but luckily I had almost everything on the sims correct.

    Which of the following best describes a difference between a compilation of prospective financial statements and an examination of prospective financial statements?

    a. The compilation engagement is covered under SSARS while the examination engagement is covered under SSAE.

    b. A compilation does not contemplate the auditor providing any form of assurance whereas an examination does include assurance.

    c. In an examination engagement, the practitioner should update his or her report for known changes occurring after the date of the report, whereas there is no similar requirement for a compilation engagement.

    d. An examination includes a statement of positive assurance whereas a compilation includes a statement of negative assurance.

    The correct answer is B, which I agree with, but why is A wrong? The Becker solution says A is incorrect because “Reports on prospective financial statements are covered under SSAE. Compilations of the financial statements of a nonpublic entity are covered under SSARS”, isn't what A is saying, or am I reading it wrong?

    #593281
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Cliff I believe that compilations for prospective FS are covered under attestation standards not SSARS. The explanation is not worded well but I believe it's trying to say that compilations for nonissuers are covered under SSARS and compilations of prospective FS are under SSAEs

    #593282
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    this is a good question: anyone?

    the cpa title is regulated by?

    a. federal govt

    b. state law through a licensing dept or ageny of each state

    c. AICPA through licensng department of tax and auditing committees

    d. SEC

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #593283
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    which of the ff can be significantly affected by an audit of an entity? anyone: pls explain. thanks

    a. business risk

    b. information risk

    c. risk free interest rate

    d. inherent risk

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #593284
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @NinjaCPA – The answer to your first question is B…the CPA license is regulated by the state, and only they have the power to revoke it. The PCAOB has the power to charge fines, and revoke your abilities to provide services to issuers, but cannot revoke your license.

    I think the answer to your second question is B, just based on process of elimination; the other choices don't make logical sense to me.

    #593285
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi everyone, please help with PPS Sampling.

    Recorded amount is $3250, audited amount $3150, difference is $100, sampling interval $40000.

    The taiting percentage is supposedly 3.08%, but I can't seem to figure out how to get to this %.

    Can anyone help?

    Thanks!!

    #593286
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Wow I forgot how much the transaction cycles suck. I've been in audit for three years and have already passed this exam and they are still super hard! I think what makes them the hardest is that the way they describe the cycles is totally outdated. They don't take into account automated systems and the way that everything is described is almost an entirely manual process. It's hard to apply it to the real world.

    #593287
    lvr21
    Member

    @CPA dreamer

    The % formula is the difference between the audit amount and the recordered amount (100) divided by the recorded amount (3250) …… 3.076 or 3.08 rounded!!

    {R: PASSED!! (I passed one!)}
    {B: PASSED!! (Halfway there!)}
    {F: PASSED!! (1 left!!!)}
    {A: PASSED(I am done!!)}

    #593288
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, Ivr21!

    #593289
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @CliffOM – thanks!

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #593290
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm sure this has been covered ad nauseam along with “again,” but I seriously lose my concentration every time Tim says the word “substantive” with an extra syllable

    #593291
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    independence rules suck

    #593292
    lvr21
    Member

    Anyone testing this week?

    {R: PASSED!! (I passed one!)}
    {B: PASSED!! (Halfway there!)}
    {F: PASSED!! (1 left!!!)}
    {A: PASSED(I am done!!)}

    #593293
    Ssbknyc
    Member

    Does anyone have tips on how I should prepare myself for the AUD simulations or what I should focus on? I am comfortable with MCQs, however, I just started taking the sims using Becker and starting to get discouraged. I'm taking the exam Aug 24.

    Done 08/2014-08/2015

Viewing 15 replies - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,389 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] AUD Study Group 2014 - Page 76’ is closed to new replies.