@mjp44:
Onmyway732 explained it perfectly. The crux for the answer is that examination of evidence concentrates on evidence the auditor obtained himself. While all the other options are examples of evidence obtained from management or internal information. Hence attestation risk is best reduced by examination of evidence by the auditor himself.
I have another reporting question.
“Omission of a statement of cash flows when an entity issues f/s that present financial position and result of operation, results in a qualified opinion with basis for qualified opinion para”
Why is it a qualified opinion. Isn't the auditor allowed to report only on one of the F/S??
BEC - 88
REG - 72, 78
FAR - 75
AUD - 64, 64, 3rd attempt!!!
"A day of worry is more exhausting than a day of work" - John Lubbock