Percentage of Completion Method

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by TBBG.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #201295
    TBBG
    Participant

    Please help! I thought with % of completion method, if you have a loss in one year, it wipes all all previous and current gains? Here is the question and the answer which seems suspect:

    At the end of Year 1, Cody Co. reported a profit on a partially completed construction contract by applying the percentage of completion method. By the end of Year 2, the total estimated profit on the contract at completion in Year 3 had been drastically reduced from the amount estimated at the end of Year 1. Consequently, in Year 2, a loss equal to one-half of the previous year profit was recognized. Cody used the completed contract method for income tax purposes and had no other contracts. The Year 2 balance sheet should include a deferred tax:

    A. asset and liability.

    correct B.liability.

    C. asset.

    D. none of the answer choices are correct.

    In theory, I understand that it should be a deferred tax liability because for income tax purposes, no gain is realized until the contract is complete (so income is booked for the “% of completion” method but not for “completed contract” method and you will have more taxable income in the future…. But I thought if you have a loss in any year under “% of completion” method, it wipes out all previous and current gains?? So shouldn’t the answer be D?? (Because year 2 also doesn’t have any income under % of completion method)

    Thanks in advance!

    Audit 86
    BEC 75
    FAR 82
    REG 93

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #771822
    Bnots
    Participant

    You're thinking of the situation in which the total contract is a net loser. In that case, GAAP requires that we recognize the entire loss on the contract immediately, and that requires backing out any profit previously recognized under the percentage-of-completion method.

    For example:

    Year 1
    Expected total revenue: $1,000
    Expected total costs: $800
    Expected profit (loss): $200
    Costs to date: $240
    Costs this year: $240
    Percent complete: 30%
    Revenue recognized to date: $300
    Gross profit recognized this year: $300 – $240 = $60
    Gross profit recognized to date: $60

    Year 2
    Expected total revenue: $1,000
    Expected total costs: $1,200
    Expected profit (loss): ($200)

    Here, because the entire contract is expected to be a net loser, the entire $200 loss has to be recognized. Therefore, we have to back out the $60 in gross profit recognized in Year 1.

    In this particular problem, however, the contract is still profitable, but much less than we originally expected it to be:

    Year 2
    Expected total revenue: $1,000
    Expected total costs: $950
    Expected profit (loss): $50
    Costs to date: $570
    Costs this year: $330
    Percent complete: 60%
    Revenue recognized to date: $600
    Gross profit recognized this year: $300 – $330 = ($30)
    Gross profit recognized to date: $30

    We recognized $60 already in Year 1 when after Year 2 we should only have recognized a total of $30, so we have a $30 “correction” to make.

    ETA: I believe the IRS doesn't allow you to deduct losses until the project is completed under their completed contract method, so — I think — you would actually be booking a deferred tax asset if you book an overall loss on the contract.

    #771823
    TBBG
    Participant

    @bnots, Thanks so much!! I get it now!

    Audit 86
    BEC 75
    FAR 82
    REG 93

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Percentage of Completion Method’ is closed to new replies.