- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 2 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hi everyone,
Hope everyone is doing well. Hoping to get some advice on a matter that I am dealing with. It is a little long but I wanted to put all the details in one place to ensure that anyone reading this has all the details.
I graduated with a Bachelors in Finance a decade ago and recently decided to sit for the CPA exam. Given that I have not completed 150 credits yet, I decided to complete the requirements for the 120 sit rule, which requires having a college degree and taking four courses. I took three of these courses online in the last six months and one of these courses a decade ago.
My initial evaluation came back that I was not eligible to take the CPA exam given that I needed a course concentrating in cost and/or managerial accounting and that an “Accounting course for non-majors do not qualify towards the New York CPA education requirements.” A decade ago I took a course called “Managerial Accounting for non-majors” as part of my Finance degree. I read through all the requirements and there was nothing saying that this course was not applicable, so I mentally checked off that course requirement.
In response to that initial evaluation, I pushed back saying that two of the CPA’s authoritative websites did not mention anything about a topic of accounting courses for non-majors not qualifying. If this is a requirement, it should be spelled out in those sites. It takes many months of preparation to sit for the CPA exam and if the rules are not spelled out in clear terms, then that is not fair.
I got a response that my initial evaluation was updated and that I should get my NTS within 1-2 weeks. I thought that this ordeal was over, but if it was I wouldn’t be posting this! I just got the Final Evaluation that I do not qualify to sit for the CPA exam and that the quality assurance team is not going to accept my Managerial Accounting course. No explanation to my original request to show me where in the rules this is written was provided.
If I accept this, I have to take three more months to take this course again, which would cost me $1k. Then I would have to submit a new transcript request which would take 1-2 weeks. Then the transcript would need to arrive at the NASBA site, which may take another week or two. Then I would need to go through this evaluation process again, which is taking eight weeks now and will cost me $170. So I am looking at a six month delay and over $1k because of someone making a decision that does not point to any CPA rules that I saw.
CPAs are trained to look to accounting rules for guidance, but CPA organizations do not feel that they need to follow the same standard. Any guidance would be appreciated!
Thank you!
- The topic ‘NASBA Issues’ is closed to new replies.