- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
if possible, can someone please provide a chart for the 1933 and 1934 Acts, as well as common law please or let me know where I am missing details on the one below. I am looking over the one from my review course, but would like a different perspective. while trying to use the chart i have, i keep getting some on the NINJA questions wrong thank you!
Here’s what I understand so far:
1933 (initial issuance):
who can sue: anyone (no privity needed)
Plantiff prove: material misrepresentation, suffered loss
Defenses: followed GAAS, plantiff did not rely, auditor show he was not negligent1934:
Plantiff must prove: Reliance, intent to deceive, material misstatement, suffered loss
auditor’s defense: conformity to GAAS
Section 10b: CPA will be liable if they acted without good faith.Common Law Liability
Breach of Contract:
-need privity to sue
– intended 3rd partydefense: didn’t breach
lack of privityNegligence Law
-need privity to sue
– known or foreseen by CPAdefense: lack of privity, adhered to GAAS(not neg)
Fraud/ Gross Negligence
– anyone
– unforeseen (unknown)defense: not gross negligent, not material
- The topic ‘Chart for 1933/1934 and Common Law’ is closed to new replies.